I only use the written explanations, but often find that they do not provide enough explanation for their reasoning. It is especially frustrating when questions with formal logic, such as conditional reasoning questions, do not provide the mapped out logic. For example, the analysis for the stimulus may or may not provide a logic map, and the answer choices usually do not provide a logic map. I would like to see more written explanations that include a logic map of what that answer choice says and why it is wrong (i.e. it does not match with what the question is asking or does not fit into the formal logic of the stimulus). A lot of the explanations just say "this is not supported." without explaining why and how.
Hello! I'm interested in starting/joining a study group in northern Virginia or DMV area.
I am not registered for an LSAT yet for this cycle, but I've taken the LSAT before. I work full time, so evenings or weekends would work best for me.
@J.Y.Ping The person sharing their screen cannot see the chat or tell who's talking. It would be nice if the study room features were more akin to Zoom or Teams, with the ability to see the chat, video/profile pictures and the screen you're sharing at the same time