I like the method of splitting the conclusion and premise descriptors. That was a very helpful tip for these types of questions.

damn. rip

L's on L's on L's

why was this question so easy compared to some of the previous. my brain is tired.

finally got one right due to mapping it out like J.Y., but that took way too long.

For answer choice B, if we are assuming that the conclusion in the stimulus is true, that "This shows that Checker's motive in refusing to accept the coupons was simply to hurt Marty's pizza", wouldn't it be true that answer choice B best draws enables the professor to make that conclusion??

Aren't we tasked with picking an answer choice that explains why the professor would come to such conclusion?

Principle questions seem to ask which answer choice is more of a general description of the stimulus?

"dumbasses"

bro, who the fuck is Pat

brain is officially fried

Could answer choice (C) also be eliminated due to the missing belief of containing evidence? The answer choice only says that the police did not find any evidence, and not if they believed for the computer contain any.