Specific reference questions ("the author mentions X primarily in order to..." and so forth) are the only RC question type I really have not mastered at all and they come up in almost every PT. If anyone has any resources that would be great.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
studying since may, hovering around 170-72 with blind review and 165-69 before. can comfortably finish a section in about 38-42 minutes and i am taking the september lsat.
so i'm aware there are a few older posts on here about this topic, but was hoping that someone could chime in with new advice...
i'm averaging around 170-173 on blind review pts, and about 92-100% on RC and LR drills with 25 questions/4 passages (sometimes ~88% for the harder ones). however, my scores before blind review tend to hover around 165-67. i know that these are, by no means, bad scores, but i do want a higher score on the actual lsat (sept 2024).
my biggest problem for rc is that i tend to miss essential parts of the passage (that i do not realize are essential until i get to the questions), and end up having to a) go way over time or b) only get to thoroughly read the passage during blind review.
for lr, i panic about the time and end up not selecting an answer i'm confident with until blind review.
i know that comparing timed/untimed scores is one of the main goals of blind review, so i guess i'm also just asking about how to balance time and thoroughness.
i don't know if i need to just keep drilling (though i feel like i'm burning through questions and pts) or if there's some other trick!!
any tips would be appreciated :)
Don't know if this is a good idea but I sped through the entire curriculum in about 2.5 weeks by not watching the videos for "You Try" questions that I got correct, and watching the videos in 1.7x speed—I still feel like I was able to get a lot out of it and I'm doing pretty well on the drills, but of course take this advice with a grain of salt. Good luck!
the gasp i let out when i got this correct
got this on blind review phew
I understand why D is correct but I still don't quite understand how C could not be interpreting as conflating the outcomes of the claims (that both types of studies are "more frequently reported on")
i kinda ate with this
i took my first two PT (other than my diagnostic) over a year ago after about 2 weeks of studying using the powerscore books, and scored a 165 and 168 respectively (which i know are more than decent!). i took a break from studying since school & work were super busy. i started up again earlier this month with 7sage and am planning to take it in september, but i feel like i'm not improving at all or even getting worse, especially in LR. my LR scores are almost the same as my initial diagnostic and two PTs last year. when i revise my wrong answers, i feel like i grasp the individual question but am unable to reapply the theories/methods elsewhere.
i'm aiming for a score in the low 170s. any advice for this kind of plateau—or should i just keep at it and be patient (i am a very impatient person when it comes to my studies)? or should i change up my method (slow down w the curricula, drill more, etc.)? i've just been going through the curriculum and i'd say i am about 70% through.
sometimes i feel like i just need to chill and take everything in but i physically cannot be chill in general. and comparing myself to my diagnostics last year & how quickly i made progress back then makes me a little frustrated. this post is a bit long but if there's any advice for how to better frame my studies/approach in general, i would really appreciate it.
Regarding negative the correct AC (A): I don't understand how even if the TREATMENT is different, that it cannot hold true that CE is just more fatal/life threatening — just because the treatment is the same does not mean that the outcome will always be positive in both cases no? Like even with Advil, the same treatment is used for different kinds of pain with different kinds of risks.
tf was this question
wow i kinda ate with this one
This was my first time getting it right and then changing my answer during blind review to the wrong one 😭
this is a nice ego boost after the previous question geeez
Would it be too simplified to think of answer (C) as just maintaining some sort of relevant "control" per se in this study (that's how I arrived at the correct answer). I eliminated (A) on the basis that "amount" does not really tell us anything about what kinds of foods are purchased (e.g. people could be eating more of cheaper foods). Or are we strongly encouraged to think about it in mathematical terms.
I got this question correct but I still don't fully grasp why we can't reject E for the same reason we rejected D
If D affirms the conclusion via "to a lesser extent", doesn't "much less competition" in E still insinuate that there will be some competition produced out of it? Or did I miss something from the grammar section & "much less" can mean "none"
i left a reply but i am going back to edit it because i realized you basically made the point that i was going to make but i can't figure out how to delete the comment, so i am just using this comment to say good luck!
get some rest on ur flight instead 😫 three hours of missed prep time wont kill you and you deserve an unplugged break!