My thought process

A. No support : the info provided did not give us an exhaustive list of what constitutes as a work of art only some examples of art i.e poem, novel, symphony is it said ONLY in the stimulus then maybe this choice would be okay

B. No support : Blank verse??? not in stimulus red flag I zoomed through this choice, but a more clear explanation of why it is more wrong is that the stimulus lists some of the MCL that a poem exploits it doesn't say it has to have all.

C. Correct : I gaslit myself into marking this off because I thought Novel = no MCL but the stimulus clearly says usually not MCL + meter & rhyme= MCL = Poem this choice is the only choice that is valid by referring back to the facts stated in the stimulus we have proof that this answer is supported.

D. No support : I picked this wrong answer but I recognize how wrong my assumption was the stimulus says nothing about non-artistic poems it was a pretty choice because it has familiar elements but it rearranged them in a way that makes the statement unsupported.

E. No support : This one was a bit tricky for me the stimulus says symphony maybe a work of art that exploit some MCS it doesn't say is a work of art (like it does for poem) so I originally thought it was an okay AC but if we read closely we know from the first sentence that work of art = MCL not MCS so that makes this AC unsupported

Note to self : READ CAUTIOUSLY

knowing you had the right answer and changing it during blind review is so frustrating. I don't know how I convince myself to changing the right answers, but double down on the wrong answers. I got have got to start taking more time on the blind review sections and read the choices more carefully. If anyone has some tips that can help with this pls reply!!

Hi- I have a similar problem I purchased LawHub through 7sage but I am unable to access my LawHub advantage subscription. Every time I log into my LawHub account it it asks me to upgrade. Please let me know how I can solve this issue!

I ran through this question very quickly and overlooked B because I took a section of the context and reasoned B into being relevant in evaluating the argument. The part where it says "...a fact that the government and the home lighting industry are eager to change." I made the mistake of taking this to be a good motive and source of support in a sense for answer B. I noticed my misjudgment during BR, as the lighting industry eagerness to gain more clients and make more money doesn't do much for evaluating why everyone should use low-wattage bulbs. I mean you can argue that it is relevant, but with the given stimulus and in comparison to the other 4 answer choices B really does not do much which is why it is the correct answer.

"Goddamn it you had a chance" - me with every wrong answer I had full confidence in

"the alphas came back" poor Jocko

.