This explanation was so good!

took me like 8 mins but I got it right! yaay!

ahh finally got the light switch moment! I was struggling so badly with this, but I went from getting a 0/5 to a 4/5 in my blind review by changing my strategy. What I did was the following:

1. only read the first opinion (ignore the second), and use the argument from the 1st opinion to find answers that have some support. I eliminate answers that have no support/no opinion by the author. This left me with either 1 or 2 choices. If its 1 then i circle that as my answer and don't even bother reading the second opinion (not sure if its right but it worked?)

2. If I have 2 choices then I read the second opinion, and the answer literally jumps at you!

hahah the comments made me feel better because I chose B too and I got so upset!

I got it right the firs time then in the blind review i changed it to D, smh this is the hardest section for me so far

wow kevin did such a great job explaining these! Can he make more explanation videos? so detailed and helped explain it so well!

took me 15 minutes but got it right! yay!

Hi also preparing in toronto! Taking august or September and october. I study daily.

Dont fret same just happened to me. Look at the sections see how u did on those sections. If uve studied them and got it right then ur fine if u havent studied them and got them wrong then ur fine too.

is it just me or are these so difficult? :(

that was hard but finally got it right.

I was stuck between A and D and chose D because A was giving support to the argument vs D which was giving support to the critics thus being an ignored flaw by the argument. The wording on these are super difficult but we got this!

hope this helps!

I got this right by literally just looking at the end sentence and finding an answer that also had an or in it, and i lucked out lol

I was already struggling with sufficient assumptions and then this curve ball was thrown in :'(

It took me 10 mins to get it wrong and he says relatively easy haha

the verbs is and are or were are what i am getting completely wrong. I am not sure why can someone help?

Just realized this is a MSS not even a MBT, but this should be evident for everyone asking if we need logic lol the answer is YES, its so important and honestly so hard too

Would answer B, be right if all things stayed the same but it said the contrapositive of the original statement in the stimulus?

so

original: R - > /effective

contrapositive: Effective - > /R

or does it have to use different indicators? I feel like i make the mistake of sufficiency necessity when I don't understand the stimulus completely or I have not mapped out the logic properly

LMAOOO I DID NOT EXPECT THAT!

5/5!

got it wrong because I had NO idea what deleterious was, but best bet I won't forget it now :(

I tried to do this twice, and got it wrong both times, I was so confident B wasn't the right answer but now that you've explained it, it makes sense. But its still confusing lol

lol busted ass xD

took me 5 minutes of not drawing, I gave up did the diagram and it helped A LOT and I got it right! yaaaay!

finally got one right lol, and for the same reason JY did!

when the bears popped up that made me laugh lmao