A) is wrong because they don't disagree on whether the information is accurate or not, just that it does not focus on important issues.

C ) is wrong because Logan does not discuss anything about popular art. So he can't disagree with something he does not mention!

Not necessarily. You are assuming and thinking into the future, you are thinking they will continue to buy it after the protection is installed but that doesn't have to be true. All we know is that its downloaded more frequently than competitor but that doesn't mean it will continue to be downloaded or bought after this program is implemented.

I chose D as well but I noticed its wrong because its attacking the premise instead of attacking the relationship between the premise + conclusion. Its rewording a premise which we are never supposed to do. I. thought of it as triggering the sufficient condition but for SA questions we are supposed to bridge from P -> C not trigger it.

spotting the flaw is important. If it mentions that it is flawed then look for a flaw, but if its just match the reasoning then normally there is no flaw.

This is a MBT, IF is not implying a possibility it is a logic indicator. It is introducing a sufficient condition. In MBT, we have to use the information in the stimulus not make any assumption and find an answer that MUST BE TRUE based on the stimulus. E could be true in the real world, these politicians may avoid detection but thats you bringing in outside knowledge into the lsat. You have to use the information in the stimulus. Nowhere in the stimulus did we mention anything about them avoiding detection.

There was not really a some statement. The some statement you are referring to is just triggering the sufficient condition, its not another condition. In this stimulus if the sufficient condition is triggered there must be two things that happen, 1. you will not be reelected and 2. you will be censured. The stimulus gave us half of the answer and then saying they will be censured then just made the answer a MBT. hope this helps!

The words "neither nor" is basically saying you can't do A, AND you cannot do B. You can read on this more with the logic lessons in the core lessons.

I would say A is wrong because its too narrow. Its only focusing on muscular coordination, but the stimulus was more broad and it said that child development. Muscular coordination is just part of a child's development. So are other parts of a child development affected? we still don't know. Thus it really does nothing for this stimulus.

Does not matter its the same concept. Answers may be a bit more general!

Also love ur username!! Claiming it for myself too! 😂

For any sufficient assumption question the answer will always be formulaic. Any answer that does not bridge the gap (or link up) will be incorrect. So for example, in this stimulus we need an answer that connects the chain from "uses words ambiguously to the readers enjoyment does not depend on it" anything that is not this is wrong. So for example,

A) is wrong because we know it does not link the two things we need to make this answer correct and also, based on the stimulus we don't know if there are any readers who try to attain a precise understanding.

B) is wrong because it says the writers are unconcerned. How do you know that? no where in the stimulus did we discuss anything about what they are concerned with.

C) is right because it links the two concepts for our conclusion to be properly drawn. Sufficient assumption will ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS have something that needs to be linked up.

D) is wrong because after grammar parsing it literally says that Most writers are poets. we didn't say that. we have nothing to support this with, and also, we don't have a MOST relationship in the stimulus, its only a MUST relationship. (if you dont know what i am saying read up on the different relationships like some, most, and all etc.

E) is wrong because sure it could be true, but its not linked the two concepts that need to be linked for our conclusion to happen.

I hope this helped a little! just remember sufficient assumption is like math its all about connected some concepts together so the conclusion is confirmed. To do this question type you have to improve on your graphing and logic!

It took me 10 mins to get it wrong and he says relatively easy haha

Just realized this is a MSS not even a MBT, but this should be evident for everyone asking if we need logic lol the answer is YES, its so important and honestly so hard too

unfortunately i feel like these are sometimes the curve breaker questions on the exam. You will only get like 1-3 questions per exam but they are almost all 4-5 stars difficulty

Not just for MBT but for any question types you should not go backwards. You can contrapose and negate it which basically switches and slaps a negation on it but other than that no going backwards at all!

very very important, these will keep coming up in most other question types so pay close attention!

The Headache doesnt end, I am back to review because it keeps getting harder as you progress. So try to perfect this because this will keep coming up in other question types!

LMAOOO I DID NOT EXPECT THAT!

Actually for RC reading instead of videos will help u the most! The more u read and comprehend this the better ur reading and comprehension will be when u read these extremely difficult rc passages during exam

lol busted ass xD

when the bears popped up that made me laugh lmao

This explanation was so good!

wow kevin did such a great job explaining these! Can he make more explanation videos? so detailed and helped explain it so well!

took me 15 minutes but got it right! yay!

I got this right by literally just looking at the end sentence and finding an answer that also had an or in it, and i lucked out lol