Hi! Now that the old PT's have been renumbered starting at 101-158 I'm not sure what to use for drilling, full length sections, and full length PT's. I'm trying my best not to run out of study material, any advice?
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
#feedback I chose D because I thought if that was assumed it would make the conclusion true. Since "if she could have reasonably expected... then she should pay" answer choice says she did reasonably expect therefore we can draw the conclusion that she should pay. How is this method of thinking wrong?
#feedback Would it be fair to view this through the lens of an argument by analogy?
#feedback Is it safe to say we cannot draw a positive conclusion about a sufficient condition other than in the negative form (meaning we can validly conclude we failed the sufficient condition if we failed the necessary condition) because in order to draw a conclusion that the sufficient condition is definitely met (as in this question) would mean it has to be in the necessary condition side of the arrow. I remember a few question types back where we were told a quick way to check if the answer choice was correct/worth keeping was by checking if our conclusion is in the necessary condition or otherwise we cannot reach our desired conclusion.
I hope I'm framing my question in an understandable way.
#feedback For answer choice A, that leads us to assume that the ethics violations had no affect on the opinions of those that previously thought Mayor Walker was performing good. But is this a reasonable assumption? To me it seems like it's too big of an assumption to make.
Hi! I'm also interested in joining your group, thank you!
#feedback Can we always interpret "X is dependent upon Y" as X requires Y? I took it as, the existence of moral order depends on whether human souls are immortal, and if they are then we can conclude moral order exists.