Thank you. You will too. Our plans have already actualized in some dimension

meow..i love it

Quickest approach for me is to ask 1. Is it on topic? and 2. Does it weaken the argument best?

C to me is first on topic (or relevant) to info provided and weakens best since it counters what argument states through focusing in on stim provided info: the recurrence of problematic anxiety levels.

E first is on topic, but does not weaken argument best since it is supporting our argument statement by affirming it COMPARED TO C

thanks slippin jimmy

Him taking the lsat with us inspires me to finish this journey out so that i may be as awesome like him, jimmy, who not only is the main character form the hit tv show, better call saul on AMC, but is also an aspiring lawyer.

meow

completing it under 6 months is totally doable- but it's something that comes naturally out of you, or something that happens without you putting will power or effort into. Or joining a study group, minor, course, etc. if it hasn't happened for you yet and youre studying on own time, that just means your study method is different and that's ok too. studying time and approach is a very personal thing you can't compare to others. had a teacher tell me all u need is 3 months to study- yeah not for me. def. did not let that discourage me lol.

nah id win

great analogies thanks!!!

BYE i cant unhear it thanks. now i have no excuse to not study;)

Hello here is how i approached it and i hope this helps even 1%! E is the only one that actually DIRECTLY addresses the argument's conditions/defining factors, where i felt the other answer choices lightly had to do with it/barely addressed the actual argument. Example, A) has to do with people feeling ONLY uncomfy with strangers, not strangers near our age. B) has to do with OTHER situations, what other situations? what does that have to do with aged/uncomfy people? C) the main argument does not even address people who overlook/ignore the stranger or age factor so why even consider this POV, D)the argument isnt worried or concerning people who never approaches stranger when comfortable, only when comfortably, and finally E) seems to be the only choice that considers both argument factors of age and uncomfortableness, so it's the one that made the most sense to me.

When eliminating, just focus on answer choices that have to do with MAIN factors you can draw from answer choices.

this thread has helped me break down these wordy ahhhss quesitons https://www.reddit.com/r/LSAT/comments/10wotep/how_to_overcome_complicated_wording_on_the_lsat/

i like your name

can someone summarize what na questions are as simple as possible please thanks

im having the same problem. please share your strategy so i can compare and maybe see where we are coming from- i am finding conclusion in statment first and choosing answer that starts with same concept then adding premises in answers for suppport. what about you?

no fr- we all have different paths and approaches to things- this def made me feel better about my journey. 2 months in and it feels like ill never get there. thank you