I eliminated C because I thought "just because something is susceptable to inacuracy, does not gurentee we can't determine present characteristics." That's why I was looking for a "If, then" rule that gurenteed the conclusion about present characteristics
I eliminated (C) during the actual take and BR because I thought "highly susceptible to inaccuracy" didn't meet the burden of proof needed to 100% justify the conclusion. Now that I'm taking a third look at all the choices w/o timed pressure, I can see how this is obviously the right choice.
I'm fighting the urge to debate the logical validity of [highly susceptible to inaccuracy] = [100% inaccurate]. Instead, I'll just chalk it up to LSAT writers being tricky, and that (C) is absolutely right in relation to the other answer choices.
I was stuck between C and D, I thought D could have proven the conclusion as it stating the opposite of what the Premises are saying. So therefore it would prove, I don’t know that was my thought process.
For those that chose AC (A), keep in mind that with SA questions, we are trying to make the conclusion logically valid. In order to do so, we will more than likely choose the AC that uses the strongest language because it will do the best job at proving the conclusion to be 100% true. "may" is too weak of a claim, and won't help bridge that gap to the conclusion with 100% certainty. With sufficient assumptions we need 100% certainty that the conclusion will be true. Weak ACs (probably, could, may, not necessarily) are almost always wrong because they don't guarantee the conclusion.
This has helped me consistently chose the correct answer so far!
This class of questions is so frustrating for me. I feel like with each question type I have been able to eventually understand the ask and apply it but not here. I understand the ask but for some reason I just can never pick the right answer.
ive been consistently getting these right but only with mapping out the question after a really long time. Every question ive done on this module has been a minute or 2 over the target when it does not feel like I could have understood it faster.
At the same time on PT's its like sufficient assumption questions are frequently ones that I have trouble with even without this framework, so it just feels like this kind of question in general is harder than the rest. I pretty much always end up going over time because of them.
I had C, then changed to D. I felt that the wording on D matched a little bit better since it used "reliably," but didn't account for the "can reliably," where the stimulus was talking about "CANNOT reliably predict."
Drew the assumption in my head that "the reports of their past are "unreliable" (from background knowledge about self reporting) and if the past is unreliable which would be the cause then of course you cannot determine the present the outcome. Then quickly eliminated C because I thought well that is just a restating of what was already said even though they didn't already say it it was on the assumption that I drew.
I finally got one right in this section! Had to slow it down, and read it multiple times to ensure that I understood which answer would be the bridge between the premise and conclusion.
I was stuck between A and C. I chose A over C because I think the assumption that self reporting can be inaccurate is more reasonable than the assumption that researchers need accurate self-reports to be effective. For example, perhaps they can conduct rigorous psychological work on a self-report that is inaccurate and identify patterns of fabrications and learn about the subject from them. I'm not saying this is the case, but it was a possibility that popped into my mind and I thought A bridged the gap created by that possibility, which seems to be less reasonably inferred away and more disruptive to the argument than the gap filled by C.
C helps properly draw out the conclusion because it implicitly, meaning not explicitly stated, connects high inaccuracy with unreliability. This is common in the higher difficult questions.
It's also why JY says you shouldn't focus on a particular "formal" language, which in other words means, dont always expect to find the answers that you anticipate. Because there are different variants of how it could be said. Hence this example. Instead, understand the relationship. Once you understand the relationship, there are some answer choices that force you to reasonably make an implicit assumption and there is no other way but that.
C was the best answer because it was the only answer out of all the answers that connected it to the conclusion, BY FIRST ACKNOWLEDGING THAT REASONABLE IMPLICIT ASSUMPTION. the other answers had to force WAY MORE UNWARRANTED ASSUMPTIONS.
remember you can make reasonable assumptions. this is typical in the harder questions.
4
Topics
PT Questions
Select Preptest
You've discovered a premium feature!
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Hold on there, you need to slow down.
We love that you want post in our discussion forum! Just come back in a bit to post again!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
76 comments
I eliminated C because I thought "just because something is susceptable to inacuracy, does not gurentee we can't determine present characteristics." That's why I was looking for a "If, then" rule that gurenteed the conclusion about present characteristics
Goddamn
I eliminated (C) during the actual take and BR because I thought "highly susceptible to inaccuracy" didn't meet the burden of proof needed to 100% justify the conclusion. Now that I'm taking a third look at all the choices w/o timed pressure, I can see how this is obviously the right choice.
I'm fighting the urge to debate the logical validity of [highly susceptible to inaccuracy] = [100% inaccurate]. Instead, I'll just chalk it up to LSAT writers being tricky, and that (C) is absolutely right in relation to the other answer choices.
Was doing so well in this section but this question completely threw me off :(
So if an answer choice simply repeats a premise, it's automatically incorrect because it's not affecting the argument at all, right?
I was stuck between C and D, I thought D could have proven the conclusion as it stating the opposite of what the Premises are saying. So therefore it would prove, I don’t know that was my thought process.
Finally, my first time getting the correct answer on SA mm
My 2 cents literally nobody asked for:
For those that chose AC (A), keep in mind that with SA questions, we are trying to make the conclusion logically valid. In order to do so, we will more than likely choose the AC that uses the strongest language because it will do the best job at proving the conclusion to be 100% true. "may" is too weak of a claim, and won't help bridge that gap to the conclusion with 100% certainty. With sufficient assumptions we need 100% certainty that the conclusion will be true. Weak ACs (probably, could, may, not necessarily) are almost always wrong because they don't guarantee the conclusion.
This has helped me consistently chose the correct answer so far!
ugh, finally got one right - I hate these!!
Wordy ahh question
idk why I don't just
read the answers before I answer
im losing my mind
This class of questions is so frustrating for me. I feel like with each question type I have been able to eventually understand the ask and apply it but not here. I understand the ask but for some reason I just can never pick the right answer.
ive been consistently getting these right but only with mapping out the question after a really long time. Every question ive done on this module has been a minute or 2 over the target when it does not feel like I could have understood it faster.
At the same time on PT's its like sufficient assumption questions are frequently ones that I have trouble with even without this framework, so it just feels like this kind of question in general is harder than the rest. I pretty much always end up going over time because of them.
I had C, then changed to D. I felt that the wording on D matched a little bit better since it used "reliably," but didn't account for the "can reliably," where the stimulus was talking about "CANNOT reliably predict."
Only 3 stars.........This one was a tough one to understand.
Drew the assumption in my head that "the reports of their past are "unreliable" (from background knowledge about self reporting) and if the past is unreliable which would be the cause then of course you cannot determine the present the outcome. Then quickly eliminated C because I thought well that is just a restating of what was already said even though they didn't already say it it was on the assumption that I drew.
I finally got one right in this section! Had to slow it down, and read it multiple times to ensure that I understood which answer would be the bridge between the premise and conclusion.
Mmmm, word salad question.
I was stuck between A and C. I chose A over C because I think the assumption that self reporting can be inaccurate is more reasonable than the assumption that researchers need accurate self-reports to be effective. For example, perhaps they can conduct rigorous psychological work on a self-report that is inaccurate and identify patterns of fabrications and learn about the subject from them. I'm not saying this is the case, but it was a possibility that popped into my mind and I thought A bridged the gap created by that possibility, which seems to be less reasonably inferred away and more disruptive to the argument than the gap filled by C.
My blind review is always so much better. Being timed really stresses me out.
FINALLY GOT ONE RIGHT HUHUHU - I'm crying
1:39... Anyone else taking almost double the time on these? SA is not fun.
ohhhhhhhhhh
C helps properly draw out the conclusion because it implicitly, meaning not explicitly stated, connects high inaccuracy with unreliability. This is common in the higher difficult questions.
It's also why JY says you shouldn't focus on a particular "formal" language, which in other words means, dont always expect to find the answers that you anticipate. Because there are different variants of how it could be said. Hence this example. Instead, understand the relationship. Once you understand the relationship, there are some answer choices that force you to reasonably make an implicit assumption and there is no other way but that.
C was the best answer because it was the only answer out of all the answers that connected it to the conclusion, BY FIRST ACKNOWLEDGING THAT REASONABLE IMPLICIT ASSUMPTION. the other answers had to force WAY MORE UNWARRANTED ASSUMPTIONS.
remember you can make reasonable assumptions. this is typical in the harder questions.