can someone explain 3

#feedback

we need videos. it is so hard to follow and understand even when its broken down. I feel like this is making things harder. I read comments of people who summarize it in few words and it makes sm more sense than the long explanations going back and forth

this sucks I just lost all confidence

for "one cannot become Jedi unless one possesses extraordinary discipline" I was super confused and only made sense through English rather than the rules. Until I realized I can use both rules it helped me out so im hoping this can help someone. For negating necessary (cannot) and negating sufficients (unless), we can do it both at the same time.

Jedi is the subject, Possesses extraordinary discipline is the predicate.

Negating Necessary is also known as subject -> /predicate

Negating Sufficients I do /subject -> predicate

Therefore, combining both would be /subject -> /predicate

/J -> /POD

POD -> J

for 5.1, why would It matter whichever Heegun or Wong are first? Wouldn't it essentially be the same?

i suck so bad at these omg

how I got B vs C was that C was talking more about nutritional deficiencies vs B talking about the direct correlation of symptoms.

In the conclusion the stimulus speaks about how the SYMPTOMS vary around the world which is what B speaks about. C speaks about nutritional deficiencies for the compound that causes the deficiencies, but does not really directly talk about the varying symptoms.

idk if that makes sense or if I thought of It wrong and I just got lucky lol but yea

this stim made 0 sense to me idk if its just me. I couldn't even figure out an answer because I cant even understand the argument

so if the answer choice is another rule is it automatically able to be eliminated?

im struggling so hard on this section omg

I GASPED

bruh I just finished the RC module like a week or two ago and you guys now come out with this to replace it -.- crying

oh jeez well this sucks

bruh