User Avatar
sophiarose305
Joined
Apr 2025
Subscription
Free
PrepTests ·
PT115.S1.P4.Q22
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Sunday, Dec 22 2024

hi

-1
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Sunday, Dec 22 2024

So motivating when RC is what u struggle with most and u get all the questions right :D

13
PrepTests ·
PT103.S2.Q19
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Saturday, Dec 21 2024

I don't get why A is not the answer. The stimulus says "Violence is an extreme form of aggression." I don't see how from this we can conclude that not all aggression is violent since the paragraph only tells us what constitutes violence is not what constitutes aggression.

1
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Friday, Dec 20 2024

This passage hitting different post Luigi

25
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Wednesday, Dec 04 2024

5/5 FIRST TRY AYYYYYEEEEEEE :D !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

10
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Wednesday, Dec 04 2024

Yeah if the argument concluded that Arton's claim is false because Arton's argument depends on false facts that would be more reasonable, but instead it's saying that Arton's conclusion is false. However just because Arton's argument is faulty doesn't make his conclusion false.. maybe u can get the same conclusion with some other argument.

0
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Sunday, Dec 01 2024

Edit:

E is wrong bc the critic does not challenge any of the profs premises. The sentence ur referring to where the prof calls rap individualistic is a conclusion not a premise. But even if it was a premise the critic's claims does not prove the profs conclusion wrong bc of the fact that the music critic says rap is not PURELY idiosyncratic we cannot rlly deduce from this how idiosyncratic rap is. It can be very or it can be minimal. The prof says rap is extremely individualistic which doesn't mean there's no individuality.. it leaves room for some individuality. So, saying rap is not purely idiosyncratic and that rap is extremely individualistic do not contradict. I think if the professor said rap is purely or only individualistic and it was part of a premise rather than a conclusion then A (which is basically E but stating only one of the profs premises was challenged) would be more appealing.

1
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Sunday, Dec 01 2024

I think one reason is bc the music critic says rap is not PURELY idiosyncratic we cannot rlly deduce from this how idiosyncratic rap is. It can be very or it can be minimal. The prof says rap is extremely individualistic which doesn't mean there's no individuality.. it leaves room for some individuality. So, saying rap is not purely idiosyncratic and that rap is extremely individualistic do not contradict. I think if the professor said rap is purely or only individualistic then answer E would be more appealing.

0
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Saturday, Nov 30 2024

AP questions light work (Im cooked if i get a 5/5 difficulty)

7
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Saturday, Nov 30 2024

the light at the end of the tunnel

13
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Saturday, Nov 30 2024

HOWD I LITERALLY GET LIKE 70% OF NA QUESTIONS WRONG THROUGHOUT THE LESSONS BUT ON THE TRILL GOT 5/5 FIRST TRY... MAYBE I MIGHT MAKE IT

3
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Friday, Nov 29 2024

finally got a 5-difficulty question right !! harvard might as well just take me now

5
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Friday, Nov 29 2024

got a 5/5 after 4 attempts whoop whoop !!! :D

1
PrepTests ·
PT128.S2.Q20
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Thursday, Nov 28 2024

the lsat is a form of self harm

10
User Avatar
sophiarose305
Monday, Oct 07 2024

Fuck off Pat

6

Confirm action

Are you sure?