Why does Penn have to be not eligible. is there not a case where Franklin and Penn are both eligible for having exemplary records but Penn could have not saved someone's life and exceeded reasonable expectations? But Franklin has?

if E didn't have the 2nd defect wouldn't E be correct? #help

a - talking about something too unspecific as the argument is about microglia

c - we dont care if this works irrelevant to argument

d - ok but we are arguing about microglia

e - irrelevant

b - is telling us bc the acid reduces microglia which means a reduction is better which means yes these cells are causing Alzheimer's

also keep in mind it says the REASONING not the conclusion! that's why I looked at A to be a delicious answer !!

I guess b makes senes if we assume Jane and Denise are roommates bc then that means Denise will rent something downtown which Jane doesn't like

Would C be right if they asked for a hypothesis

I was between C and E, and ended up choosing E based on what makes the most sense. However upon watching the video it makes sense that they used Several in the text versus Most in the answer. 

I thought inhibit meant something else and not prevent.. lmaooo

why is e correct if it says some ? or did I misunderstand the last part of the video

as a stem major, oof

is a dubious claim an argument? that's why answer A doesn't make sense to me

The "SHE" was confusing and thought it meant Kuttner was trespassing.. but I failed to read 'on his land'

didn't catch b says ALL owls but thankfully even if it says all barn owls is not correct !

poor animals

I didnt know purported means alleged.