Chose D because under time constraint, I thought that metabolic quirk helps to explain that brain cells needs blood glucose. But it's actually the other way around, and D helps explain B instead.

I chose E ultimately over D because I didn't connect employment with earnings, and also ignored all the red flags in E under time-constraint. Simply thought that E is right because if they don't now receive treatments, then the proposed system would work. Red flag: "most" and "automobile accidents" which is not specified in any way in the stimulus

Nowhere says it. Stimulus says humor is the means, not the only means. It's sufficient, not necessary. You would have to assume for it to be necessary, which noone is asking you to do.

The stimulus never said that teachers hope humor will help, it's simply say that teachers hope to accomplish the same thing comedians has accomplished with their audience. Which is why the answer needs to have "humor" in it to make sense, hence D is wrong

Not sure I know what you mean. D is simply saying that one way to increase freshwater would not work. It doesnt mean that there is no other way to increase freshwater. Therefore D does not need to be assumed

Was stuck trying to eliminate D and E. D is wrong because it is already implied in the premise, and also that it doesnt really asnwer why economists must look beyond borders. Same with E, it doesnt touch on why they have to look beyond, they didnt do it then doesnt mean they must do it now. A is strong and right to the point, country cannot prosper unless everything isn't look at, therefore they must look at it.

Almost chose B because it means that the mammals that survived didn't have to go through the dramatic shift, but ultimately this is not at all enough to answer why the other mammals went extinct. E directly address why the mammals went extinct, partly due to not being able to move to better environments

Chose D simply because it clearly matches the stimulus. anyone is is not aware is clouded, and everyone who is aware taint their emotions. therefore untainted means not aware, which means clouded. I eliminated C right away because we are not to make strong assumption in inference questions. To take illusion and tainted emotion as self deception is a really big assumption considering how the passage doesn't even mention deception.

@teowmomm nice, I think it's all practice, I do agree that this is a good strategy tho, probably combined with flagging obviously hard questions

Figured that the argument is about whether saving endangered is important enough. Therefore I ultimately chose D, but other answer was tempting too. Needs to practice sticking to the flaw to save time

We r not comparing which is better, therefore everything besides D is wrong

I always wanted to do this but I always stop myself before I move on after quickly choosing an answer. Like i will suddenly look at another answer that i think might have better wording and then I'm just stuck there until i'm sure i got it right before moving to the next

Chose C because it matched with the stimulus more than A. Needs to watch out for weird probability vocabs like "often."

nearly chose C because "new idea" are often there to trick you into not choosing it. But even if genetics makes significant contribution, doesnt mean that television won't contribute greatly as well

Analogy is comparing two similar situations. The stimulus is comparing two groups as example, therefore not C. Was considering B as well but stimulus is not drawing any conclusion directly from the example.

Chose A because it matches the argument perfectly. "we would do so because we really do not believe in clairvoyance," "Were we to believe in clairvoyance." it's about clairvoyance and not actually knowledge

Basically the claim is that the department does not now spend five times as much money as it did in the past for the same duties. What if there are more duties? E directly addresses that. D is wrong because it doesn't say if they now spend five times or not, or if they used up the entire budget.

there is no way a question this easy sneak into the real lsat

was consider E but thought that "help" should be interpreted as the same as leading to it, which is absolutely not the case

feels so good I caught the "comparable" and eliminated B right away. The stimulus is about why pay more on same number of items, not why buy more overall

@katieshuter1737 Sorry no one responded. The stimulus says good social reform "increase the sum total of happiness," D simply says that there is a chance the proposed reform would not increase the sum, therefore it won't be a good social reform. It's increase vs not increase, not happy vs unhappy

Eliminated B and C right away because these would still increase the sum total of human happiness. D is the only answer choice that addresses that sum and destroy the proposed reform.

a potential flaw is that "what if other butterflies that are not in danger fly like that too?"

I predicted the flaw to be "what if that's what the population represents and the program didn't choose their interviewers," therefore chose D

I misread D as "analyzed Greek tragedy a few times in detail before" instead of "few tragedies." Only chose A after eliminating D, because at least we can assume that "classified" and "useful" are two different stuff