Every time I take a break longer than one day 1 star questions feel like 4 star ones

Oh it's okay. I get it. Studying has been paying off. Got it right and didn't even remember the question.

Holy shit this should have been easy for all of us. If it werent for that last sentence being so loosey goosey.

Saw right through the trap answer and still chose a complete wrong answer.

Okay so it is said that you do not rely on outside assumptions but there was an outside assumption that I just did not get with this.

I only got this right because the wrong choices were clearly wrong. Hopefully that means I am getting better at finding the bad answers.

Normally I can see what I did wrong but I cannot. We have no way of knowing how they actually feel. We know that they SHOULDN'T feel a certain way. If this wasn't a strengthening question then I could see that being an answer but we aren't even strengthening the stimulus itself at this point. Just an assumption.

@skhadeejat5329 Thank you! These explanations suck sometimes.

@elbicho And then when you ask a 99th percentile tutor, they just regurgitate the same thing.

See I knew the reasoning, I just couldn't tell if either c or e better stated it.

I need more questions like this please.

I got it right, but it wasn't the answer I was looking for. It doesn't tell you why waste-to-energy is preferable over the other option. It just says that what is already there produces more. Then again, the stem does say BEST option.

I almost got this wrong and spent so much time because I didn't know what LPs were. So it basically created an invisible premise. I need to get better as seeing these patterns. If I just noticed the pattern right away, I could've answered it.

I see where I went wrong. I am no longer scared of finding out what I did wrong because I can now see where I can improve.

I see what I did wrong and the answer is obvious but this just seems like a time consuming question. I mean I normally rule out answer choices based on if the conclusion matches and then go from there but each conclusion feels packed inside where I have to pull it out.

I have to admit I already had some bias when looking at the answers. I assumed the flaw was that he treated lack of evidence as evidence even before finishing the stim, and I went to the answer the talked about evidence. Even though when I read it I knew it was saying the reverse of what I was looking for, I thought I'd gamble.

What is confusing me about this is that when it says that either EZ should be banned or T should be legalized, I am thinking that it is saying either both should be banned or both should be legalized since the continuity of the stimulus already confirmed that T was already banned.

It wasn't that I couldn't see the assumption being true, but it didn't seem necessary? At least not the on I was looking for.

This whole question stumped me because I had no idea that was the conclusion. I thought it was further context.

@BrendaPerezRivera I thought A was better than D.

@lolowoo1 Yeah, I feel like figuring out how to journal requires a curriculum all on its own.

Ok I understand why it is right but I was not prepared for "most likely" not being over 50 percent even though its MOST likely.

He sounds a lot like Seth Rogen.

This is the first question I think I have walked away not understanding it. I feel like other implications is the stimulus clouded my judgement.

I feel like he's playing God an only his assumptions are right. When are mine gonna be right!?