One week until June LSAT score release. How are we feeling 7Sage?

Personally, I have been doing the online equivalent of pacing up and down my room. Lurking on forums, calculating admissions odds based on hypothetical scores, and checking LSAC for... something???

Can this week please go a little faster?!

Hello everyone,

I’ll be hosting a free LSAT Reading Comprehension study group tonight where we’ll work through a full passage and discuss strategies, common patterns, and approaches that consistently show up on the LSAT.

Just for transparency: I do offer private tutoring, but this study group is completely free and open to anyone.

I typically host these sessions every Thursday at 7:30 PM ET, and I’d love to have you join us if you can.

RC Study Group Thursday, June 18 | 7:30–9:00 PM ET

Google Meet: https://meet.google.com/dvz-wxnu-ger

Dial-in: (US) +1 240-366-5287 PIN: 873 992 246#

Looking forward to seeing everyone tonight!

Hi 7Sage community! I have a quick question on a concept/logic that I've been getting confused about recently in LR, specifically for causal stimuli.

I learned that one way to weaken a causal conclusion (e.g., A causes B) would be to show: when there is no cause, there is still an effect (e.g., even without A, B happens). However, I'm confused because the conclusion doesn't say that A is the ONLY cause. Hence, doesn't saying that when there is no cause A and we still see effect B not necessarily weaken?

***

More concrete example would be:

• P: Children who play violent games have shown violent behavior.

• C: We can hypothesize that violent games cause violent behavior.

• Question: Which answer choice would weaken the argument above?

  • AC: Some children who have never played violent video games show violent behavior.

For this AC, my line of reasoning would be: we don't have the purported cause (playing violent games) but we still see the purported effect (showing violent behavior). Hence, the conclusion's causal relationship can be weakened -- this would be the classic no-cause, see-effect weakener.

But I'm also thinking: the conclusion did not say violent games are the only cause of violent behavior, which means the conclusion takes into account other causes. Hence, this AC does not weaken but rather has no effect.

Which line of reasoning would be correct?

This has been bothering me for the past few days -- I would love to get clarification. Thank you! :)

LSAC is not removing the pause button. Nor do they require an additional link to pause an exam. It's still located in the top right. Nobody asked for this extra link.

I can see that the old interface option is long gone from the drilling options, which is good because the June tests are officially over. However, the blind review interface remains that of the old interface.

I'm sure that changing it to the new interface is already somewhere on the agenda, as blind reviewing in the new interface can allow us to really get proficient in using its features.

Hi,

I am currently studying for the August 2026 LSAT. I wrote the Jan 2026 test and scored a 157, and I am aiming for a 165 this time around.

I am currently scoring around a -5 on RC sections (I am happy with this), and around a -5/-4 on LR.

However, I wanted to get some advice as to how I can continue to improve on LR, ideally I can reach a consistent -4/-3.

I've noticed that during timed sections, I will usually get 1/2 easy question incorrect, followed by 2/3 hardest level questions incorrect. During BR I will get it down to -1/-2.

Does anyone have any suggestions on the most efficient way to close this gap?

I am currently drilling my priority tags, doing around 3 timed sections a week, and BRing everything I do.

Please let me know if there is any additional information I can provide.

Thank you in advance.

I have been studying for just about a year. I've taken it twice (both rushed) so now I am finally taking my time. I have been just doing drills recently with an average of a 160 equivalent so i am feeling pretty good. That being said, I want a 160. I've got 7 weeks. Help!

I just got the best score (-1) that I've received on a drill section ever! I recognize this is only a section and not a PT, so it's not reflective of what I'd get overall, of course, but I'm sharing because I'm proud of myself.

For context, my first PT was 157. I'm aiming for a 160-165 on the test in August. I'm planning to test in October, November (if that's possible to take it again so soon - let me know if you know lol), and December as well if needed.

I am just curious—if this were to be the case—how much time would LSAC give? I would think at least 6 months to 1 year notice, simply because of how much prep goes into studying, but I don't know how much time historically LSAC has given for changes. Anyone have any educated guesses or ideas?

Are there any tutors that do Personal Statement editing/help with brainstorming?

I have a ton of ideas for my personal statement and supplemental materials, I just need help translating to paper. Typically, I have no trouble with writing and have always considered it a strong suit; however, because there's so much depending on my application, my stress is through the roof! I am aiming for a T14 school and I am taking the LSAT in August. My GPA is a 3.92!!

175 score, Cornell grad magna cum laude. I'm also an LSAT instructor/tutor with 10 years private tutoring experience and five years of experience at a major test prep company where I tutored one-on-one, taught in front of a classroom and consulted on essays and apps.

I have helped countless LSAT students achieve their law school goals. The LSAT can feel like an insurmountable challenge and is viewed as the predictive indicator of law school success. LSAT requires a way of thinking that might feel unfamiliar to most. It's not a test of intelligence - it is a test of pattern recognition and understanding of the structure of arguments. I help you study strategically so that you develop the skills you will need on test day, such as reading critically, inductive and deductive reasoning, and organizing evidence. I lay the foundation for the skills you will need to succeed in law school! I identify the techniques that will be most useful to you on test day and shore up against weaknesses so you can attack the test with confidence.

I also help craft graduate application essays, supplemental essays, law school application personal statements, and academic papers. I help with ideation, conceptualization, style, grammar, vocabulary, and structure. I guide, support, and help develop craft, de-stressing an often-fraught process.

Feel free to reach out! Happy to chat about where you are on your law school journey.

Hi!

I have a little problem with the practice block breakdowns. When you choose your study schedule, ie 3-4 hours a day, it generates a block for that amount of time. That being said, what is counted in that time is only the drills/sections assigned. The issue comes in when reviewing the drills/sections. Reviewing takes about the same amount of time, 3-4 hours, if not significantly longer. There's no day in the study block allotted specifically to reviewing missed questions over the course of that study week. So, with the review, the 3-4 hour schedule finds itself becoming closer to 8 hours of studying per day. Is there a way to update this in order for it to account for review hours? If I were to set my study goal higher, it would only affect it by including 4 more hours of drills/sections, and not any time for review.

I can LR drill all day until the cows come home. 100-75% accuracy on individual drills regardless of question type.

As soon as I start a section, my brain goes kaput. I average around -12 on LR. I literally do not know how I keep forgetting the lessons learned or put the whole picture together. Advice to overcome this issue?

Hey All! Just a plug for today's AMA class. If you enjoy this forum but were like "what if I could ask these questions LIVE?" then this class is for you!

Details here.

And FYI that we do this every Wednesday at the same time!

Hi, I'm currently studying for the LSAT and have been scoring in the 150's and my goal is 170's by September. I've been wanting to work more on timing in the reading comp section and just more in depth of some logic questions. I preferably would love to meet in person or on zoom, and make it a commitment. Please reach out if you are in the area or have similar aligning goals

Hi all, I'm about 2 weeks into my studying with a 151 diagnostic, planning to take in September. I have been solely focused on LR right now and watching fast track videos, along with J.Y's LR Basics series on YouTube. I have been drilling about 5-10 LR questions a day as I become more familiar with the different types of questions.

When should I start taking practice tests? I know that's an important part of studying but I don't want to just "waste" practice tests when I haven't even looked at RC yet. Just curious when you started taking more practice tests and at what frequency. Thanks!

So I took my first PT (not my diagnostic, but after about 2 weeks of studying) on June 6th. I just took my second PT today, after a little under a month of studying, and improved by 2 points from the PT on June 6th. Is this normal progress? I plan to take the LSAT in September, so I'm just wondering if there's something I should be doing to speed up my progression.

Hello,

I finished the curriculum and started to take real RC sections and smaller sections. I find that I’m wildly overconfident in how I thought it was going to go, often not really questioning whether I got more than 1 wrong per section but still usually ending up in 160 range with obviously more than one wrong. With Blind Review, I can normally get almost all of them right.

How do you bridge the gap to what you score in Blind Review? It just feels a bit useless since it’s pretty easy to come up with the answers after having considerably more time with the passage. It’s clearly nice to figure out where you went wrong but it’s hard to see how valuable it is just to revisit the passage again and have additional time.

Does anyone have tips or other resources they used to help bridge the gap/get things right on the first attempt? I’m probably 2 months into studying with a goal of low 170s in September and October dates.

Hello 7sage team, I ask this purely out of curiosity, but what's with all the new features? Don't get me wrong, I love them and I want them to stay but I'm just curios where the innovation is coming from. If 7sage has been around for 13 years, why add all this stuff now? Did you guys get funding from somewhere, did you hire a new awesome computer science guy, or just trying some stuff out? Also while you are here reading this and you are currently adding study games.....I do have a previous post about something that could be a RC study game nudge nudge wink wink.

I'm working on a monitor larger than the actual test. Blueprint has "tablet mode" where it shrinks the size of the screen to match the actual test. Is this a thing for 7sage?

Congratulations to our June Community Lottery winners!

1. @PowerUp_Tutoring

2. @EDobbs24

3. @TeklaCo

4. @zunair

5. @madeinkeaven

6. @jamandaa

7. @MissProsecutor

8. @Ivana

9. @NatMan

10. @nycxchi

Your $50 gift cards are on their way!

Want to win in July? Post or comment on the forums, add a profile picture, and track your applications if you've applied to schools this cycle—that's it!

Hello , I've been tracking why I've been missing answers and so far it's either because I was down to two answers but chose the wrong one or I have no idea what the stimulus is talking about . Is there a way where I can learn to comprehend well on harder stimuluses especially the ones where I have no interest in that said topic? I feel like if I can just learn to comprehend on harder stimuluses I can reach my goal score. Any tips and tricks if anybody struggled with the same thing ?

For those who have taken the Argumentative Writing section for the June LSAT, what timeline did you have your submission approved or cancelled?

I took mine and it only says "Exam Initiated" but nothing regarding approval.

Would really appreciate anyone who could share the timeline they had with approval!

I am starting this post by admitting that it may be a stupid question (or not I am genuinely torn on this) but would it be wise to use scratch paper on the LSAT? I am taking the test in August 2026 and it will be on a computer. I know LSAC has stated they will provide a pencil and scratch paper but would that just waste time? Is it reasonable to study with no paper and pencil? Im afraid I will just waste time by writing but I also believe my accuracy could go skyrocket if I wrote down the logic instead of trying to sort it out in my head? Please give me your advice.