Title says it all. Heard a rumor somewhere that this is a real thing, and AI bot mentioned it lol. Can anyone confirm that in a RC section, passages 4 vs 1 tend to be different?

Hi guys-- we are continuing our study group, this time with a focus on flaw questions. Please join us!

Link to Zoom:

https://us06web.zoom.us/j/81654443172

Link to group:

https://7sage.com/discussion/59575/conditional-reasoning-tutor-led-study-group-thursday-june-11-8-p-m-eastern?notification_id=ntf_033W5Gm5UcYlBw9teBldgc

I really like Kevin's style of explanation, but there are no options to choose Kevin as my choice! It would be great if there is a button that only brings up problem solving videos by Kevin!

New to Flaw questions? Check out the top 10 flaws you need to know:

Great quick overview for beginners. If you're experienced, you might appreciate the visuals for each flaw type.

Check out this flaw cheat sheet, too: https://7sage.com/lessons/logical-reasoning/flaw-or-descriptive-weakening-questions/argument-flaw-cheat-sheet

@EricB7Sage

I plan on taking the April LSAT. I just started my study plan and am looking for study partners to meet up occasionally. I am in FIU area for the summer and will be located more near south miami/coral gables starting august. I can start a Whatsapp group if that is more convenient :)

Hope everyone is doing well this weekend.

As the title shows, I am seeking a tutor that has the special ability to train me on successfully diagramming Conditional Questions and detecting Casual Questions. Italics and bold were used because simply said, I do not understand Conditional Questions.

On the official November 2025 LSAT, I was able to score a 157. On various PTs through 7Sage, I have been able to score 158, 162, 165, and 169.

I am trying to master conditionals because they absolutely ruin my sections, and ultimately, my days. I did well in an Intro to Logic class in college and yet, I'm still struggling mapping them out correctly.

Casual is a bit more understood but still gives me a fair bit of trouble.

In essence, I am looking for someone that has had experience with someone like me and that was able to break-through to them. My budget is up to $50 an hour. If it goes well, I would be happy to go beyond learning just this and picking up any other points I can along the road.

Thank you all.

Hi, I have been studying the LSAT for quite a few months now, and I have built my score from a low 145 to a nice score of 164 at my best, and an average of 161. Especially my past few PTs have generally been around the low 160 area. My problem is when I test sections, I typically have strong scores like -4 being my worst in LR recently and having common -4, -3, and -2. Yet on full PTs, no matter the beginning or ending of the exam, I do fairly worse. I'm talking closer to -4, -5, -6. I'm not exactly sure why this is, but I have some guesses, like the scary feeling of taking a full test compared to a section, but honestly, I am not too sure. This is also corroborated by the fact that, unlike sections where this practically never happens, sometimes on recent PTs I completely bomb sections. I'd love to hear any advice or thoughts on how to approach this, because my room for improvement feels less on the fundamentals and understanding of questions and more on the psychological / consistency side. Thanks for any comments in advance!

I'm curious how everyone is using their Wrong Answer Journals to actually reinforce what they've learned. When I do drills I go through each question even if I got it right and watch the video/read the explanation to make sure that my reasoning is correct and matches up. I go through each Answer choice and say why its wrong or right and why I thought it was correct, and why I made the mistake that I did in choosing the wrong answer. My issue isn't reviewing the questions; it's retaining the lessons afterward.

How are you reinforcing the takeaways from your mistakes? Do you revisit your Wrong Answer Journal on a schedule? Do you summarize recurring patterns or make flashcards? I'm finding it difficult to remember the notes, errors, and takeaways from a drill I did two weeks ago, or even from a question type I worked on five days ago. And sometimes the takeaway isn't even a recurring pattern—it's something very specific about that particular stimulus or argument that tripped me up. I'm not sure how people retain those kinds of lessons either.

I'd love to hear what has worked for other people!! #help

I've noticed that these questions are greyed out, meaning that they aren't factored into my accuracy % in the overview. Should I turn them on to count? Honestly it would make the accuracy number skyrocket b/c I get most all of those right relative to drills (for whatever reason), but I don't know if that would be a good thing lol.

If anyone's interested in meeting up at a café or library to study, let me know! I'd love to put together a study group. I'm based in Brooklyn but can travel.

I have had trouble when it comes to review. Whenever it's time to do blind review or wrong answer journal, it feels like my brain completely turns off. Just going through the motions to say "I did it". When it came to trying to understand the argument and the answer choices, I would just read the explanation and again move on. Not taking the time to understand anything on my own. Just shooting myself in the foot. I did a drill today and on the one question I got wrong, I ignored my first instinct to just read the explanation and move on. I was determined to understand this argument on my own. I broke it down and was able to not only see why my answer choice was incorrect, but what the argument was, I found the gap in the assumption, and was able to see what the correct answer was. It feels like a small win to move forward for effectively but a massive win personally. If anyone else is struggling with this, don't take the easy way out!

I'm an American who went to university in the UK and am now going back to the US for law school. I am wondering if anyone has experience with how law schools see this/how grades are converted to GPAs? Is anyone going through the same process?

Hey everyone!

I went from a 138 → 173 on the LSAT.

The test did not come naturally to me. I had to build a more structured, intuitive approach from the ground up, and that is the same approach I now use with students who feel stuck, inconsistent, or unsure how to improve.

A bit about me:

- Accepted to top law schools, including UBC

- Worked at the University of Toronto

- Built LSAT systems, drills, and study plans for real students

- Genuinely love teaching and helping students make the test feel manageable

If you are:

- stuck between two answer choices

- struggling with timing

- missing the same question types repeatedly

- studying a lot but not seeing consistent gains

- unsure how to review mistakes effectively

I can help you build a clearer plan.

My tutoring is focused on understanding, strategy, and consistency, not just doing more questions. We can work on Logical Reasoning, Reading Comprehension, wrong-answer review, timing, study planning, and custom drills.

I am offering a free first session to see if we are a good fit.

Schedule free here → https://cal.com/joshua-jtx5ud/consultation

Email: contact@aspiringattorneys.com

Or PM me here.

I am not sure where else to give this feedback, but I feel like it needs to be said.

I have caught myself four weeks into the practice section of my study plan overdoing the drills. It was not until I checked the AI tutor that I realized that I needed to slow down because my studying was unproductive and I was using up fresh questions at a rapid pace. But, it seems very intuitive as per the study plan to simply generate a block, do said block, and move on. And, since I am studying full-time this summer, I was generating the 6 hour study blocks, leaving no time for anything else. Even with the blind review, and my wrong answer journal, I was doing too many drills without changing my approach to problem questions, etc. Part of this is my fault, and after putting some of my statistics and worries into chat GPT, I was able to figure out a study plan that uses less drills and focuses on my problem sections. I just wish that a study plan like that was more intuitive on this platform. This has been something that I have struggled with all the way since doing fundamentals, as well, because I was struggling to find the time to integrate live/recorded lessons, and other features of 7Sage into my intense study plan.

Anyway, this is both for the makers of 7Sage, and for people who may also be stuck drilling nonstop in the Study Plan portion. It's ok to not generate so many hours of just drills, and devote your time to review of old questions, finding patterns in your Wrong Answer Journal, and focusing on problem areas. :)

I have found that when I take RC sections (and to a lesser extent any later section in a PT), I often have moments when my eyes totally glaze over, and I completely lose focus on what I’m reading. I’ll ‘read’ two or three lines, then have to physically shake my head and re-read, having internalized NOTHING. This also happens when I try to skim for details to confirm answers, I’ll just kind of lose what I’m doing and need to spend mental energy regaining my place in things.

This might not be a strict LSAT issue, but does anyone have any tips for streamlining RC sections in general, or tips to maintain focus on singularly important points?

Hi everyone,

I've been consistently getting -4 on RC lately and I have no clue on how to improve my accuracy, since the question types I get wrong on each practice section differ.

Has anyone else dealt with this issue and have advice to share? I'm aiming for the September test and hope to improve by then!

Ive accidentally skipped blind review so many times, i wish there was a way to go back and do blind review after you have already clicked out of a PT or section

I just moved to Arlington VA this week! I have a 164 official, shooting for a 175. I believe that I would get something out of studying with someone of any ability level. I would love to go through questions, answer them, and discuss with a real person in person (at least sometimes) why they did what they did! Lets learn together :)

I have been studying for the past 3-4 months but feel as if nothing is breaking through. When I drill, I am usually able to understand all my mistakes after review and am constantly note taking. But when I am doing PTs or longer drills- it feels like nothing is breaking through. I FEEL like I know so much more but my actual performance is showing other wise.

My PTs have been 145, 153, 152, 160 (which really encouraged me), 152 and 153.

I have not done the core curriculum or watched videos. I feel as if I am a fail, examine and learn, type of learner, but will of course consider this. Does anyone have any suggestions or any notes? I am so convinced I understand the logic and tricks soooo much more- but in practice it shows otherwise. I KNOW we can all do this, but super disheartened.

Had to get zero wrong out of respect for how many picks the Lakers have left

Hi, could we have a feature that shows us which of the 4 sections were experimental? Also, not sure if this had been addressed- but is there plans to update the BR up to the new law hub appearance?

I am stuck. I am horrible at RC and have been studying for over 6 months now with multiple types of resources (7sage, tutoring, blueprint, powerscore...) and nothing is helping. I cant seem to get better AT ALL. I am not fully sure where my problem is but I am a ESL lsat studier and i don't know if that's why. I will accept any help, any tips and any tricks.

THANK YOU!!!

If you're feeling stuck or de-motivated, you're not alone. Improving your LSAT score takes a lot of practice.

How much? We ran the numbers: https://7sage.com/how-long-to-improve

Hello everyone,

My name is João, and I scored a 171 on the June LSAT. I’m currently offering LSAT tutoring focused on helping students identify and eliminate recurring mistakes through a structured, detail-oriented review process.

As a non-native English speaker, I understand the specific challenges that can come with mastering Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension. My own preparation involved breaking down every mistake carefully and building targeted drills to fix weak patterns rather than just doing more practice tests.

What I offer:

1. Free initial consultation to analyze your current performance and identify key improvement areas

2. Detailed review of your PrepTests to detect recurring mistake patterns

3. Personalized drills tailored specifically to your weaknesses

4. Customized study plan focused on efficient score improvement

5. Strategy development for Logical Reasoning (my main strength)

If we are a good fit after the consultation, my rate is $20/hour.

This is best suited for students who are around the 150–160 range and want to break into the 160s or 170s with a more structured and analytical approach.

Feel free to reach out if you’d like to set up a consultation or ask any questions.

Best, João