All posts
New post591 posts in the last 30 days
What are the some online LSAT class courses that you all have taken that worked for you? I took Princeton Review before and it was okay. I'm looking to enroll in a new class coming up for better luck. Please let me know if you have any recommendations
Hi! Just a shower thought I had but, do some URMs get a higher boost in admission chances than other URMs? For example, would a Native American get a higher boost than someone who's Hispanic, or are all URM groups given the same boost?
Subscribe to the podcast:
The leaves are turning, decorative gourds are everywhere, and the law school admissions cycle is in full swing. We break it all down, from the statistics regarding enrolling 1L classes (up), to LSAT numbers (up!), to a look ahead at what this likely means for application numbers (UP!).
Also see if you can spot the error regarding the year in which Cecil Fielder hit over 50 home runs for the Detroit Tigers!
Does anyone have any LSAC forum experiences to share? did anyone get any positive or negative experiences out of it?
& the subsequent drinks social hour at the bar with fellow 7sage LSAT members?
I really appreciate the open bar since I am unsure if I can afford drinks in nyc ($21 for a drink? that is a week+half groceries). The drink the bartender gave me was bitter and made me want to throw up a bit but drank it down like medicine. After wards walking to Times Square I saw the lights and people while some people were imitating me as if I was wobbling (even though I was sure I was not).
I plan to add my experience below within a day or two:
Hi!! I am looking to start a study group in Auburn, AL I am taking the test in January 2026. Please reach out if interested in studying together.
Subscribe to the podcast:
Our panel of law school admissions deans convene for their November panel to answer that most eternal of questions—is “optional” really optional and how required is “required”? Touching on Why School X documents, character and fitness explanations, background statements, and more, our panelists will walk you through the ins-and-outs of these documents and will remind you that the most essential truth of a competitive application is “be sure to follow a school’s instructions.”
All that—and more!—in this month’s discussion.
Recently, the Priorities section of my analytics has been super bugged.
Tags are often ranked as higher priorities than they should be. Some tags in which I have 100% accuracy are ranked from "highest" to "medium" priority, and all RC tags are labled "highest priority" except one.
Here are some screenshots demonstrating the problem:

Is anyone else experiencing this bug? How can I report this to 7Sage?
Subscribe to the podcast:
Are these admissions tips common knowledge…or shocking revelation?
Jake is an old hand when it comes to dispensing pearls of law school admission wisdom. But Clayton is a relative newbie and was surprised to hear Jake’s answers to often-asked admissions questions.
In this episode, Clayton gets a chance to ask “say what?” about Jake’s admissions best practices.
They touch on vague statement prompts, whether optional really means optional, what’s so baffling about resumes, and much more.
Is it too late to apply to any Ontario Law School for fall 2026?
Listen and subscribe:
How can you create systems that set you up for success?
This week, Bailey and Priyana talk about studying for the LSAT with ADHD and how time management and focus strategies commonly used by people with ADHD can help anyone build stronger study habits.
They share practical tips for every stage of the study process, from getting started on tasks to structuring your day, along with Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension–specific advice. They also discuss the value of handwritten lists and explain why both Priyana and Bailey swear by sticky notes.
Listen and subscribe:
On this week’s special edition of the LSAT podcast, Henry, Rahela, Levi, and Priyana play a Secret Santa-esque game.
It’s a festive show, filled with the gift of LSAT study tips.
They cover everything from note-taking to diagramming, when to take your best guess to the pitfall of marathon sessions, and offer tips like “momentum matters more than perfectionism” and “you don’t win LR by being fast, you win by being decisive.”
Subscribe to the podcast:
Clayton, a current law school applicant, chats with law school admissions expert and mastermind Jacob Baska to learn the answers to pressing admissions questions.
They delve into:
the importance of adding an “interests” section to your resume,
focusing on applying to schools in locations you’d like to live in,
whether it matters if you apply in January or March for regular admissions,
and how to create a comprehensive and easy-to-parse application.
Listen and subscribe:
This week’s episode features 7Sage instructors ZeSean Ali and Nicole Agranonik, fresh off their 1L fall semesters at Columbia Law School and Berkeley Law. They share what law school is really like, what surprised them most during 1L, and the strategies that helped them survive their first semester. Tune in for practical tips and a clearer picture of what all that LSAT work is preparing you for.
I wanted to suggest adding a way for users to see their overall average time spent per question for Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension across all drills and practice.
Ideally, this could appear in the analytics section alongside existing stats like total questions attempted, accuracy, questions answered per day, average scores, etc. Having an overall average time per question would make it much easier to track pacing improvement over time and understand how close a user is to test-day timing.
It could also be very helpful to break this timing data down by question difficulty (Levels 1–5). Seeing average time by difficulty would allow users to identify whether they are spending too much time on easier questions or over-investing in higher-difficulty questions, which directly relates to pacing and skip strategy under timed conditions.
Since 7Sage already tracks both question difficulty and time spent on individual questions, this would be an aggregate view of data that’s already being collected. I think it would be a useful addition to the analytics tools, especially for students like myself who are working to improve their timing.
Thanks for considering this.
I’m not sure if this has already been asked, but I was wondering how to gauge where I stand now that Logic Games are no longer required. Since all previous PTs include a Logic Games section, how should I take a PT and grade myself accurately?
Hi I have a question for Kevin and JY. I just saw this and I wanted to ask how 7sage is adjusting
Hello, looking to see if there are other individuals in the NYC area wanting to meet on weekends to discuss wrong answers and go over practice problems together. I have been advised that really focusing on wrong answers and understanding them will help significantly; thus, I wanted to create a study group just focused on this. I am prepping for the June exam as I work full time, thus, I need more runway to study. Feel free to message me!
I hit a wall early in my prep. I logged every wrong answer religiously in the notes section. But after a month, I realized I wasn't learning; I was just hoarding my failures in a list I never wanted to look at again.
I was spending hours managing data when I should have been fixing the underlying logic flaws and rewiring my old ways of thinking. I realized that re-reading the same question wasn't helping—I was just remembering the answer, not learning the rule.
The inefficiency was driving me crazy. About 70% of my journal was stuff I had already learned from, but it was buried in with the difficult concepts I still needed to work on. I was wasting an hour a day reviewing a massive wall of text just to find the few questions that actually mattered.
I eventually built a tool to fix the workflow. It filters out what I already know and uses AI to verify I actually know the pattern of the difficult ones by generating new variations. If I got it right, it schedules review for longer. If I get it wrong, it shortens the review period so I can focus on the questions that trip me up most. I went from a 157 to a 173 in a few months, and I really think it's because I used this as a "hyper efficient" wrong answer journal to find the signal in the noise.
Does anyone else have a good system for "pruning" their wrong answer journal? Or do you just let the list grow forever, or skip out on using it entirely?
Hi, i posted on here recently for Alabama test takers wanting to meet up. I am in Birmingham seeking study friends. Please let me know!!!
When reviewing questions in a drill, it's helpful that the analytics shows the question history. Would it be possible to also include a quick overview of which AC I selected during my previous attempt(s) without actually clicking on the previous attempt? It would be great to see if I'm consistently picking the same wrong AC, if I'm switching between wrong ACs, or if I had a lucky correct guess during the first attempt. Thanks!
I’m taking my lsats June 3rd which is only 4 months away. I created a study group if you would like to join. We can study , tutor each other and support each other. The group me is linked below. It is based in San Antonio so if you live in San Antonio maybe we can meet up in study in person. You can still join even if you don’t live in San Antonio.
The more the merrier.
Subscribe to the podcast:
Being placed on a law school waitlist can feel confusing and frustrating, especially when you do not know what to do next.
In this episode, Jake Baska breaks down what a law school waitlist actually means, how schools use waitlists, and what steps you should and should not take if you are on one. He walks through when to send a letter of continued interest, how to provide meaningful updates, and how to avoid common mistakes that can hurt your chances.
You will also learn how to manage expectations, how to make decisions while waiting, and how to stay proactive without being pushy. Whether you are on one waitlist or several, this episode will help you move forward with a clear plan.
Hello hello!
I took the February test this weekend (yay!), but I ran into some trouble trying to take the argumentative writing section. When I went to take it last week, my Google Chrome gave me a "Privacy Error". I had to call and ask them to reset the section for me! My plan is try it again tomorrow, but I wanted to ask if any other Mac-users experienced the same issue and what you did to get around it.
Thanks!
Subscribe to the podcast:
Admitted student visit days can shape your entire law school experience. In this episode, @JacobBaska sits down with @TracySimmons and @KamilBrown to break down what these programs are really about and how to make the most of them.
They discuss the purpose behind admitted student visit days, what prospective students should pay attention to, and how to evaluate cultural fit within a law school community. From engaging with faculty and current students to observing classroom dynamics and campus culture, this conversation offers practical advice on navigating the admissions process with clarity and confidence.
You’ll also hear concrete tips on preparation, follow-up, networking with admissions officers and alumni, and why finding joy in the law school admissions journey matters more than you might think.
If you’re deciding where to enroll, this episode will help you move beyond rankings and into real experience.

