As the title states, I just need a bit more clarification on how to know when I need to find an answer that asks me to identify the missing link, rather than an answer that, if negated, would weaken the argument.

I recently attempted this question and was stumped to find that I needed to find an answer that was the missing link.

Hi everyone! I'm wondering if anyone has advice for struggling with the PTs in the 150s. I know a lot of prep companies etc. say that there isn't much that is different about these newer exams, and it's oftentimes just test anxiety that makes people do worse, but I uniquely score below my median only on certain exams in the 150s (specifically 150 itself, 151 and 152 were most difficult for me).

For anyone else who has this issue, were there specific question types, etc you worked on drilling? I'm wondering what I can do or hone to make sure that this no longer is somewhat of a blind spot for me. For the most part, I get tripped up in these RC sections, but also on LR questions with atypical ACs (as opposed to one question type more so than the others).

Just did it and each section dropped like 8 points, it's actually depressing. Hopefully someone might know why that is or maybe my skill went randomly down.

If anyone is already scoring in the 160s and higher and wants a good study partner that can help with other strategys reply to this and we can start.

Hey everyone! I am a junior in college and I am just now starting my journey in preparing for the LSAT. I am a division one athlete so time is limited but I am willing to put in the work to get a grade that represents my abilities. I was wondering if there are any tips or recommendations that y'all swear by as I am starting this process!!

I do well on most other stems but MSS is the most difficult one by far on every prep test i get them most of them wrong or all wrong but i do a lot better with every other stem, If you know a decent strategy to help with this please say it below. Thank You

I’m a big anime fan right? So im watching Tougen Anki and it dawned on me..there are so many villains whose entire spill is a different type of flaw. So I’m sitting here thinking about every character ever and comparing them to different flaws lol.

I noticed the You Try questions are not included in the analytics overview by default, but was told by support that you could manually toggle them to be included. I don't consult notes and try to mimic test conditions as closely as possible whether its a drill or a You Try question and when I toggled all of the questions to be included, my drilling accuracy when from 44% to 69%. Happy to see that jump up since the pool went from 17 drill questions to 149 comprehensive questions but wondering how I should understand this information. Did I skew my data to be more comprehensive and useful or did I give myself leeway? ( As I type this out I will say, maybe what I didn't consider was that the analytics may be more useful when I get to my PT weeks and I won't want the You Try data included, but let me know your thoughts!)

side note to dev team: It would be cool to have a select all + filter option to where we could filter for the specific types of q's we want in analytics (ex: able to filter between You Try + PT + Drills and see different cuts of data to help measure performance pre-PT by relying on You Try and Drills, and then being able to just see PT results during PT stage.

Hi everyone! I just moved to LA after graduation and plan to start studying for the lsat starting this month. I like to study at cafes so I would like to have a few people to study together with. I live in Koreatown/Mid Wilshire area! My instagram is @chanellewin_ if anybody wants to dm me!

Hi everyone! First post here.

Decided to write my question here because honestly I didn't know where else to direct my question (that said please let me know if there is a better forum for these types of inquiries.)

My question is: can anyone please help explain how the "Most Strongly Supported" (MSS) questions in LR and "Implied" questions in RC are different? I've been approaching them pretty much as identical question types that can be approached with the same type of reasoning mode (e.g. spectrum of support diagram) but it seems like -- having gone through hundreds of these questions thus far -- there is actually a small but significant difference between the two question types.

Would welcome any advice on this (+ moral support is also welcome!) from my fellow LSATers! Cheers and good luck to all :)

I really love the Smart Drill function! I love being able to confidently answer one question at a time, get my score/stats and review where my logic erred before moving on to the next question.

I think a way to make the function even better is if we were able to program custom question sets for Smart Drills. For example, I have been drilling Causal Reasoning and Necessary Assumptions recently, so I would like to be able to select CausR and NA questions in my Smart Drill. For me, working in this way allows me to test my understanding of problems and the question's logic better, as well as potential strategies for answering different question types quicker than, say, a traditional 5 question drill would (and I don't have to reset after those 5 questions are done).

Of course if there's already a way to do this, I'm sure I look silly, but I think this would be a very useful implementation!

I would like to delete my 7Sage account for this service as well as the previous iteration of 7Sage

Good afternoon everyone. i've been studying for the LSAT for at least a year now and i've been practicing using Lawhub and 7sage. As of now my LR sections barely improved and im still between 10-15 per section. If you scored high, what have you done better that is different? how do you read each question? I got a test coming in January but im gonna probably register for March because that is my last real chance for a good score

Hi everyone! I just moved to LA and plan to start studying for the LSAT from this month and take it in June 2026. I don't know much people here so would love some friends to study together after 5pm at cafes/ online sessions. I live in Koreatown! Would love to connect on insta @chanellewin_

I see how this is possible for drills only. It would be helpful to use this for sections and preptest since I like to do one whole section and review them in one sitting. Or being able to add a whole section to a drill in one click (instead of manually adding questions one by one) would be also helpful.

I use surface pro and its pen. Highlighting works with my pen in lawhub, but not on 7sage. Seems like I have long press to highlight on 7sage and even that I cant drag it to highlight the whole sentence. However, it works nicely on lawhub practice tests and the actual test.

Currently my only high priority LR question type is Conditional Reasoning, and Causal Reasoning is one of my only medium priority.

Are the only lessons on these question types the foundational ones?

So I am doing a WAJ, but how do I use it effectively and when should I review it and whatnot. It would help a lot thanks!

Hi!!! I am looking to make a study group (maybe 3-7 people) in preparation for the February LSAT. I am a recent college grad based in LA and my goal is to score in the 170s. I've taken the LSAT twice but haven't performed as well as I would have liked. I think it would be helpful to work through LR questions and RC passages in a group. Please message me if you are located on the West coast and are interested!

I've been trying to study for the LSAT for a hot minute, but it's been hard for me to get moving by myself. I had a really good diagnostic of 150 like 2 years ago, and after I graduated in May - I tried to study the LSAT solo.

Solo studying with just books was awful for my mental, and then I ended up burning myself out - before procrastinating for months on end.

Now I've slipped from the study plan 7Sage has given me, and I'm just trying to kick my ass into high gear. My main goal is to study well enough to not have any room for regrets.

Here's a discord server I made for us to study together, teach each other, and hang out. So, if you want some solace during the LSAT struggle, feel free to join in and see if we can make a comeback happen.

https://discord.gg/QZEpGw5wYT

If i plan to take the April LSAT for the first time, what should my studying look like right now? I currently have the core curriculum on 7sage and it is set to finish with all the foundations & what not by the beginning of February. Then, I go into practice for 8 weeks and final prep for 1 week before the lsat. Should I be simultaneously practicing drills while doing the foundations curriculum?

I finally am starting to see this all pay off before the January test! Got my first -4 and -2 on BR for an LR section! After an embarrassing slump in the November test, I think we're all in for a treat in January! (Knock on wood). Shoutout the new WAJ feature in the notes, it's been so good to force myself to reflect.

heyy everyone,

Was wondering if there was any groupchat's out there like insta or other platforms for LSAT takers to join? Also, any Toronto LSAT takers? :p // Also leave a comment if anyone is down for a Insta groupchattt

I was listening to the 7sage admissions roundtable podcast last night to hear about application timing and now I’m not sure what to do. They mentioned that Jan. test takers should apply now and mark that the school should wait to use their Jan. LSAT. I was going to apply the second my score released 1/28, especially because I got a 144 in Nov. and now I am pting around 160. Is it too late if I submit on 1/28? Should I wait another cycle for scholarship chances? I emailed my top school (Loyola Chicago) for timing as well. Thank you!