Is this a good tactic to try? Has anyone found this to make a difference?

Hi!

I've consistently been noticing that when I get near the end of an LR section I miss the last 5-6 questions. I'm not sure how to improve from here. Is anyone else having this issue? It may be because of the difficulty of the last few questions because I struggle with them even when I go back to review. Does anyone have any advice on how to approach the last few question in an LR section?

I got this question wrong on the first try and on the blind review by choosing C.

After a closer look, I understand why E is the correct answer. For those that selected E on the first try, can you help me understand why you eliminated C?

Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question."

How do I toggle between the old and newer version of the syllabus?

Please let me know what people think is best for studying and will produce the right results

I was thinking if 7sage can change the way they edit these videos for these earlier LSAT questions. Is it possible for these newer tutors to just do explanation like JY? I don't really find myself focusing listening to other students ask questions.. the videos seem to become really lengthy.. I feel like my money is not being well spent? not in an offensive way but I would like to achieve as much as I can through 7sage and not go searching for other explanations on internet. Idk what other people think about this

So as it turns out, I wrote a reply, 7Sage did not recognize the way I wrote a Some Arrow and just turned all of those instances into blank space. The moment I submitted my reply the tab failed to load. I got it back after about 2 mins. Only then did I realize that the Some Arrows were removed. So I tried to run through and edit it with less than 3 mins. I was not able to.

Then I realized my entire reply was incorrect from the start. Really it should be deleted so it does not waste peoples' time or mislead them.

So not only can I not edit it, I can not delete it either? And this website has been around like 10+ years?... There are a number of very easy/trivial things that should have been fixed years ago.

If someone has the ability to remove my trash reply, it is here: https://classic.7sage.com/lesson/advanced-valid-forms-review/ then select Most Likes, scroll down to "2ndTimestheCharm"'s comment, I am the 3rd reply.

im local and in the West LA area would like to study with someone mostly LOGIC GAMES.....zoom or in person....

Hi folks,

This isn't a question about the LSAT, but it is a question about law school admissions and in particular the LSAC, so I hope it's still permissible to ask it on this forum.

I've not yet purchased CAS (Credential Assembly Service), and I'd like to do so as soon as possible (preferably by next week). I understand that in order to do that I need to list all of the institutions I've attended.

But on the page on the LSAC where I'm supposed to add all the institutions I've attended, I find this sentence: "Please carefully review your responses before selecting the Confirm button to submit your institutions attended to LSAC. Once you click on Confirm, you will not be able to edit your institutions."

This wouldn't be a problem if I were absolutely certain which institutions I should list, but I'm not. For:

I studied abroad for a year and I'm not absolutely certain I don't need an international transcript in addition to my domestic transcript. I don't THINK I do because I only attended for a year and the program was sponsored by my home institution, but maybe I'm wrong about that.

I believe I took two college courses from a different institution (not my undergraduate institution and not my study abroad institution) when I was in high school, but I can't remember exactly. Maybe it was three. And I don't remember the exact year.

The question: is it really the case that I have to know definitively the answer to these questions before I can "select the Confirm button"? Is it really true that I can't edit the school information page/the institutions attended page if I figure out I've made a mistake or that I do need to add the study abroad institution or that I do need to add the school I attended while I was a high school student.

I find it inconceivable that LSAC wouldn't allow people to make edits to that page in case they make a mistake or need to supplement it.

Am I wrong?

High Cholesterol

Why is the answer D not C?

i previously linked my 7sage account to a lawhub account with no active lawhub advantage subscription

i just subscribed to lawhub advantage with a new lawhub account, but i guess my 7sage account has no way of knowing that...

what should i do?

Did anyone use just the V2 version of 7sage and see a significant increase in their score? Especially with LR, as that's what I am probably the worst in. I am about to go through the curriculum right now, and really need the motivation to get started. I have less than a month till the September LSAT and I'm scoring in the low 150s on my tests. Will going through the V2 version diligently help me improve? I also read part of the Loophole by Ellen Cassidy, and will finish that up hopefully in the next week or so.

Hello! I am new to 7Sage and am a little confused on the setup. I noticed there is an option to choose volume 1 or 2 and they each have different amounts of lessons and required hours. I did not realize there were two volumes of study material and have been going through logic games on volume 2, which has less material. Which one are we supposed to be choosing?

"Astronomer: Mount Shalko is the perfect site for the proposed...."

Can someone please explain why C is the correct answer? I didn't like any of the answer choices but ended up picking E (even though I was so sure this was wrong, it seemed like the best choice at the time)

Hello,

I recently renewed both my 7Sage and LawHub Advantage subscriptions, however 7Sage is not sensing my active subscription. I used the same accounts on both websites that I had in the past. Do I need to unlink and relink accounts to fix this?

Hello! I've been studying the logic games section and JY always says to print the question to practice but there is no way on the website to print it. Am I missing a step? Please let me know :(

Hey 7Sagers,

Here's the official August 2023 LSAT Discussion Thread.

REMINDER: Under your Candidate Agreement, you may not discuss the details of any specific LSAT questions at any time. For the August 2023 LSAT, general discussion of what sections you had, or how difficult you found a given section, or speculation about which sections were scored or unscored, is prohibited until after 9pm ET, Tuesday, August 15th.

Posts that violate these rules will be taken down and may result in disciplinary action from LSAC. Let’s work together to ensure the test is fair to everyone, and not share information before everyone has taken the test.

Some examples of typical comments:

✅ The following comments are okay 🙆‍♀️

❌ The following comments are over the line 🙅‍♂️

Good luck to everyone taking the August 2023!

**Please keep all discussions of the August 2023 LSAT here!**(/red)

My test was supposed to be for 6:30 PM today. I logged into proprotor at 6:05 PM and waited two hours for a proctor who never showed up. All in all, I'm feeling the most demoralized that I've felt in a very long time. Hopefully tomorrow isn't a similar story for other test takers.

Does anyone know how long it takes to get accommodations approved?

Currently panicking because I'll be taking the September and October exams. I want to be scoring at a 160+, but the latest PT I took was at 145. Keep in mind I took that PT about a month ago, and I was on vacation when I took it. Starting next week I'll be trying to PT every twice a week, but I'm nowhere near done with the CC. I'm trying my best to work through it as much as possible and as efficiently as possible, but definitely panicking internally. Any advice?

I want to run through the CC as quickly and efficiently as I can. I'm around 50% done with LG, and around 20% done with LR and RC.

Hey, y’all! So I’m still trying to find an acceptable location to take the writing portion of my LSAT (I take the in-person tomorrow!). If I set up a table in the middle of my gym at home that has a wall of mirrors and I sit with my back to the mirror, do y’all think that would be acceptable? My thought is that if I did that, the proctor would be able to see everything in front of me and it would take the anxiety off of me. Thoughts or suggestions?

Started working through CC in January this year and have increased my score by 25 points since then. I took the June test and the night before that one I posted a similar discussion wishing everyone luck and reminding everyone that mentality is SO important going into this. When I took my June test I sadly had a medical condition flare up. I sat through the test anyway and sadly was not able to perform at my best. However, I am not letting that stop me from annihilating this test tomorrow. You heard it here first: I scored over a 173 and am confidently applying to my dream schools. Feel free to claim your scores here as well -- and remember -- you are ready and you got this!

Sending an anxiety free and dare I say... fun... test your way this weekend. Hope y'all enjoyed my commentary on the CC and the PTs, it's been lit.

Most of the claims I see have only 1 concept, not 2 main ideas/events. So, when it comes to "Step 2) Identify the two main concepts (or groups, categories, events or ideas)" in a claim, such as "Each and every member of the Q continuum is omnipotent", I don't see the 2 main concepts/ideas/events.

PLS HELP me understand: I don't see 2 main ideas/events, I see 1. So I'm thinking about step 2 wrong ---HOW can I think about step 2 so that no matter the claim I can see the 2 main ideas/events clearly? (especially one's that only resemble 1 idea, such as the one above or "The only monkeys are the one’s that live in trees")

Need help in explaining why (A) and (D) is wrong.

I understand that we need to strengthen the argument that the firm's need to reduce the tests on live animals and therefore use new tests: cultures of human cells.

However, (A) seems to infer that because there has been a move against live animal tests by social activists, cosmetics firm is motivated to reduce live animal test and use new test.

(D) also seems to implicate that if the number of the tests can be reduced by using human cultures, then the firm should use it instead of live animal test.

I chose (E) anyway but still doubtful. Is (E) the best answer because I don't need to make any inference at all?

Stim: Japan is model for such sort of training effort & nothing is implicated about its economy

=>which makes ACs (B) and (C) to quickly be eliminated

(A) - worldwide shortage? who cares? irrelevant

(E) - ??? nothing is implied about European countries having better economies

(D)- can definitely be implied from 1st sentence and 3rd sentence together.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

By the way, I still get the conclusion from the stim. Is it the first sentence?