New to 7sage format and not sure if 7sage allows one to print out the Logic Games. I have never had any issues with printing with other companies. Cannot find the printing feature on the problem set section. Am I missing something or does 7sage not allow printing? Thank you!

Is anyone still working through the core curriculum and want to be a study buddy for the January/February Test?

I use to score from -7 to -10 on logic games, my worst was -12. Over the past several weeks, maybe 2 months, I have gotten significantly better and can score in the -1 to -4 range. My last PT I got -1 on LG. I want to be really excited about this improvement but I always feel like it wasn't truly my hard studying and blind reviewing that got me here, for example I will lead myself to think that it was just an easy set or I was able to see inferences I wouldn't be able to on actual test day. The worst thought I tell myself is that my real test (in October) will have curveballs or insanely hard games that my practice isn't preparing me for and I will end up scoring -10 again.

Does anyone else struggle with this?

I'm a bit confused how to to approach reviewing the RC section. Of course tracking wrong answers and why I got them wrong. Writing down question types I struggle with. Possibly re-taking the section? But is there anything I can do beyond this for improvement?

I'm not really sure where to begin. Any suggestions would be very much appreciated!

I took the August LSAT and am retaking in October. I consistently score in the -1 to -3 range on LR and RC, but the LG still gives me trouble. I am usually -5 to -7 mostly because I don't get through all the games, scoring -1 to -3 in BR.

Everything I've read and people I've talked to say that LG is the easiest section, but that has not been my experience. I've done A LOT of practice games and can do the questions, but am still unable to get through them all in 35min. Nerves are not the issue, so maybe I'm just slow to set up and get through the questions? I would appreciate any suggestions for improving timing. Thanks!

Hi all,

I would like to form a study group for everyone taking it in November who wants to study with a focused group (preferably people scoring in 150's or higher and who are aiming for the 170s). I took the June LSAT and scored a 159 but know that I can score better and I want to practice with other like individuals. Thank you for reading and good luck to all! Send me a private message if you're interested.

Hey guys !

I hope all is going well for you :)

I struggled with practice test 67 game 2 with the " if but only if " statement I did not know that you NEEDED to create two game boards with the last rule. I was lucky enough to only get 1 wrong in the set but I need to practice more. If anyone knows any games that have the " if but only if" rule please let me know I am willing to practice all of them.

LG is by far my weakest section and I intend to write the Nov LSAT. I've done all the LGs from 10-75 but I was ignorant and casual about studying in the past (wasn't sure about pursuing law school). I'd do them, watch an explanation video and never revisited them to ensure my understanding. There'd also be large breaks / gaps between games sometimes. I did another circuit from 40-75 again in that time as well. Needless to say, my improvements have only been modest, my confidence in LG is low, and I remain prone to catastrophic breakdowns.

I've only now purchased 7sage and have backfilled all my past papertest results into the system to generate an analysis. I can see where my weak spots are. What should I do now? Do I drill my weak areas by type & difficulty progressively? Or take full 35 min sections of LG from diff PTs and foolproof them?

Anyone that can suggest a focused regimen for me would be greatly appreciated. I find myself ruing my decision not to sit for the old LSATs back in 2017, 2018 etc. where this only represented a quarter of my grade...

I got it correct by POE, but I was enticed by A and even after getting it right I still don't 100% understand. 7Sage doesn't have explanations for this test. Thanks in advance!

Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"

I have been studying for 3 months now and have been struggling significantly. Yesterday I was Diagnosed with ADHD and was prescribed Adderall which I am a bit hesitant to take. I am wondering if any one here has bee diagnosed with ADHD and either takes their medication or doesn't, and how it affects them when it comes to studying.

Also, are you going to ask for timing accommodations on the LSAT? Do you know if this affects our chances of getting accepted at a school or even a job in the future? How will this look on our record if we use accommodations?

My personal statement contains information that would normally go into a diversity statement. In that case, would I still need to write a diversity statement? If I do not, would I be missing out on a chance to present another aspect of myself?

I've tried cutting down the personal statement into the length for a diversity statement, but that makes it lose out on a lot of important points. Would it be okay to just stick to the personal statement and not write the diversity one?

Thank you!

The 7Sage Predictor say's I have about a 30% chance of being accepted as a URM/ED applicant to the University of Texas, should I apply as an ED?

For reference I have 3.9 and 156.

For now, I do want to stay in Texas and practice here, and I am a Texas resident/graduate from UH.

My other ED consideration would be Vanderbilt as they place students in Texas and give more money to ED students than UT. According to7Sage I have a 35% chance of being accepted.

Does anyone have any experience with ED in the last cycle? Any thoughts?

So, I’ve noticed that I went from -3 or -4 on LR back to -7 because I don’t use the underline/highlight feature on the digital exams. On the paper exams I could quickly underline the P and C which would help me see flaws better before jumping into answers choices…

But now I just try to do it all in my head because I’m afraid of taking more time or messing up.

I’m doing it on my phone tho. Wondering if it’s easier on the tablet? Does anyone else use this feature to help? Or should I just scrap it?

Title says it all...

How do you find motivation to keep studying after the August test in preparation for October? I took a week off...it's slowly turning into two weeks.

I just want to know my score!!!!

In a month and a half I moved from a 148 diagnostic to a 158. I am registered to take the October LSAT and so I have about 6 weeks left. My dream is to score a 165 but that seems impossible right now. If I take 2 practice tests a week and drill my weaknesses can I do it? I have a job and so I only have time to do LSAT stuff about 15 hours a week tops. Should I move my test to November?

Hi everyone,

Looking for current buddies and/or a group to keep accountability/prep for October LSAT (and possibly November). My average over the 7 PT's I've taken is around 170 (163 on the first and 179 on most recent). My blind scores have consistently been high 170s-180, and starting next week will be taking two tests a week from PT's 70-90 and conducting in-depth reviews. Goal is to score at least 170 on October exam. Would love to find some people (preferably with test averages of 165+) willing to do group Blind Reviews or section reviews of those tests + share insights and tips for performing under time pressure!

EDIT:

Hey everyone! I've gone ahead and created a groupme link for people to join. Feel like this group chat can act as a general Q/A for general and specific questions about the test, as well as a place for us to coordinate (for example, I'll let the group know when I'm taking PT's and available to BR, and others can do the same!) I'll post the link below! Happy to hear that people are interested!

https://groupme.com/join_group/70353139/YEVzThZA

Hi everyone. This is my first time using the discussion board so I apologize if it's a big longer than the typical posts. If you do decide to read it through though, I so so appreciate you.

This post is about PT5 S5 Q15 and really any other questions that have the same problem. My problem is that the question can have two meanings. Here is the question: "Q's response serves to counter any use by M of the evidence about 85-90 year-olds in support of which one of the following hypotheses?"

The first interpretation of the question can be paraphrased like this: "Which of the following is a hypothesis that Q's response supports and also counters the evidence presented by M?" The second interpretations can be paraphrased as such: "Which of the following is a hypothesis that M's evidence supports that can also be countered by Q. The difference is that in the first interpretation, the clause [in support of which one of the following hypotheses] is completely separate from the others. In the second interpretation, the clause [in support of which one of the following hypotheses] is embedded within the clause [any use by M of the evidence about 85-90 year-olds in support of which one of the following hypotheses].

(In syntactic language, interpretation one has a structure in which the PP [in support of which one of the following hypotheses] is the daughter of the main VP, while interpretation two has a structure in which the same PP is the daughter of the main DP.)

The difference between the two structures is pretty critical because it determines which person the answer choice must support, Q or M. The problem is since both structures are equally valid, both interpretations are correct. So, my question is, how are we the test takers supposed to know which interpretation to assume, when both meanings are grammatically correct?

A valid conclusions is a conclusions that's already 100% proven by it's premises. Can these questions ever be strengthened or weakened? Or do strengthening and weakening questions always have a stimulus with some error

Hii there, I'm looking for a few study buddies who are scoring in the 160s and wanna break into the 170s on the October exam. Ima be working mostly on RC and LR and I'm using the lsat bibles. Message me if yall down.

"Risk of difficult birth higher for women over 40. Those with difficult birth have higher possibility of being ambidextrous..."

This stimulus just doesn't make sense to me. Consequently, I went into the AC's lost. Is anyone able to make sense of what they're trying to say and the logical flaw made?

Admin Note: Edited title. Please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of the question"

Hi everyone! I am taking my second LSAT here in October and have been consistently scoring around the mid to upper 150s. My goal score is a 161-163. I am desperately trying to improve and have ample time to do so, but need some advice. Any thoughts or advice to help improve my score let me know- please!! Also would be happy to provide any of my metrics for each section.

Hey! I am studying for the Oct LSAT and need a buddy to hold each other accountable and such right now lol

I plateaued at 169 and 170 for a while, but I had a major milestone on my most recent fresh PT 76, which was my highest at 173. I’m looking for one or two others who would like to be tutored for free or is in a similar place as I am. I’m particularly interested in going over LR questions together on a regular basis at a scheduled time. We would go over how to translate the stimulus in the most understandable way possible, anticipate, and defend and prove wrong and right answers concretely. Max 2 hours and 5-6 questions per meetup. Please message me if interested. I’m in Pacific Standard Time.

I heard it is a common thing to write one like writing a diversity statement together with your personal statement. Some say it might help your app but I heard some admissions hate reading the extra document?

Should I write one for every school I'm applying or not? My 2 pages personal statement does not included anything about certain school.

Any advice is welcome! Thank you so much!

Dear All,

Let me know if there's anyone interested in exchange PS, resumes, etc. I am in the midst of writing all this and I think having as many eyes on as possible would be great. PM or post!