currently for RC drills on manual selection, there is only the option to filter by difficulty and PASSAGE type. But i would like the option to filter by question type as well. i think it would be useful to drill passages with those question types where I know I am lacking.

This kinda filter view is available on the "Questions" page, but not the drill page. So i was relying on that to add passages manually in the drill.

Big jump from my 164 on my last PT. Is it time to turn to private tutoring to close the gap between this and a 170+ score? Or at least score this high consistently?

I've been struggling with RC but the bible really improved my score.

My LR has been plateaued for a month (not including that exp section) as -4 is my average. What are my next steps?!

I took the June LSAT and I still haven't submitted my writing sample! I put so much focus on the multiple choice exam that I didn't even give thought to the writing portion. Now I have questions and I really need to get this done. For instance, do you need to actually complete the entire essay? I struggle with the time constraints so I'm not confident I can draft a whole quality essay in less than an hour. Also does it have to be several paragraphs long? I've read some example submission and they seem way too long to convey simple thoughts or ideas. Help please!!!

Looking for an online study partner! I am currently in rural MN so I can't meet up in person. Ideally would like to do body doubling for a minimum of 2 hours daily and write a timed PT under exam conditions every Saturday. We can then go through the exam together, identify weak areas, explain reasoning to each other, and set goals for the following week. Accountability buddy style. Am open to anything else the other person needs to succeed, these are just what I would really like to see :) We can also edit each other's personal statements and essays!

Bit of background on me:

I have only done one PT, but my baseline is 160. Aiming for 174+. I am a non-traditional student with a medical background, hoping to pursue a career in pharmaceutical law. ADHD. Would prefer female study buddies!

Hi! I've been studying for the past few months and scored a 162 last November and a 163 this June. While my understanding of the test has improved significantly, and I consistently score in the high 160s to mid-170s during Blind Review, my timed PT scores have plateaued.

My biggest challenge isn't content knowledge; it's execution under timed conditions. When the clock is running, I struggle to process information efficiently, make predictions, and confidently eliminate answer choices, even on questions I can solve correctly during review. I know my understanding is there, but I'm having trouble translating it into timed performance.

I'm looking for a tutor who specializes in helping students improve execution under pressure: building a reliable thought process, making decisions confidently under time constraints, and developing the mental consistency to perform during full-timed sections the way I do in drills and Blind Review. If you've helped students overcome this kind of timing and execution gap, I'd love to connect.

random q: the study schedule generated for me did not include some of the "try me" questions listed in the LR reviews (for example i was only asked 5/13 from the RRE section). Was this for a reason or should i go back and complete the ones listed under "all lessons"? thanks!

Hey there!

This is a friendly reminder that you have 2 weeks left to get your applications in for the 7Sage Fellowship. The fellowships is a free 12-week course that covers LSAT prep, law school admissions, and legal career pathways. It's designed for students with financial need.

It takes about 30 minutes to apply — we can't wait to read your submission!

Apply here (https://7sage.typeform.com/fellowshipapp)

I'm starting to study and plan to take the LSAT in 2027. Anyone have tips on staying consistent with study routines? General advice for someone starting out, how long I should be studying for per day? Anything helps!

In LR, the non correct answers are not just “less correct” in comparison to the credited answer, they also generally have something which makes them, in isolation, a bad answer and easily eliminated.

Is the same true for RC? Or will there be times when two answers are plausible and you have to make a judgement call which is better.

Obviously one AC is more supported than the other and one can understand that support and the rationale from the passage, but I’m wondering whether in RC one can generally assume there will be things actually wrong with the non credited answers.

Thanks sm!!

I think a really cool feature would be to able to see the how your accuracy in a tag changed after taking a drill/section/PT, kind of how when you gain/lose ELO in a competitive game like chess.com.

It would really gamify the whole priorities system and give you that dopamine hit from improving your accuracy.

Sometimes I want to redo the exact same drill after reviewing my mistakes, but recreating it every time takes extra work and time. I think a one-click Retake Drill button would make studying and tracking improvement so much easier :)

Does anyone else want this?

I am currently in my second round of studying and have been consistently studying for 7 months. I began with the core curriculum and have been working through a mix of drills, sections, and PTs. My score has moved from a diagnostic score in the 140s, to the mid 150s in my first round of studying, to a 155 official score on the October 2025 test, now to the low 160s. I have been trying to focus on specific question types that I am consistently missing. While I have seen vast improvement on conditional reasoning questions and in RC questions as a whole, I am still missing a large number of causal reasoning questions. I have tried to diagnosis the issue and figure out where I am going wrong when answering causal reasoning questions, but I have not been able to nail down the misstep. I am looking for a tutor to help me figure out where I am going wrong on causal reasoning question types. I am taking the September 2026 test so I realize time to improve is quickly fleeting, but I am determined to put in the work needed to address the gaps. Please reach out if you think you can help! Thank you!

Last week while out climbing I came across this sign, which makes for a great Math exercise. I'm gonna give you a series of questions to answer. Post your answers to them all, or just one, or a few you feel confident in.

I'm off on another trip this weekend, but when I get back I'll loop around and give feedback on everyone's answers. I might even choose a winner to give some kind of prize. No guarantees on that last part lol.

Here's the challenge.

---

---

Based on these graphs and the text above, I've come to two conclusions:

i) 5.8 is the most dangerous climbing grade in Eldo.

ii) Most accidents on 5.8 routes in Eldo are a result of leader falls.

Please provide correct answer choices to the following questions. Bonus points for wording them as closely to real LSAT answers as possible. I encourage you to look at example Math questions for guidance on phrasing.

1: Why is each conclusion vulnerable to criticism?

2: For each conclusion, what fact, if true, would undermine that conclusion?

3: For each conclusion, what fact, if true, would support that conclusion?

4: For each conclusion, what question, if true, would help us determine the truth of that conclusion?

5: For each conclusion, what is an assumption required for that conclusion to follow from the information in the photo?

6: For each conclusion, what assumption would allow that conclusion to be properly inferred from the information in the photo?

I am applying to 6 ontario law schools this cycle. 4 of these schools have the same personal statement prompt, the only difference is that they each want to know WHY THAT SCHOOL- so I have written one personal statement, and will revise it for each school to answer the "why them" - but how should i answer this? should i weave the answer throughout the essay, or simply add a paragraph answering "why them"?

Is it based on content difficulty? Question difficulty? Both?

Thanks!

How do you train endurance? I always make the most mistakes in the last section and am losing points on questions I would otherwise be able to answer.

Hello! Just wondering if I could get advice from any instructors or high-scorers on how to become better at skipping a question and moving on? Is there a sort of confidence drill that I can do to help build that habit? Over the past few tests, I've noticed a pattern of freezing early in an LR section and spending 4+ minutes on one level 2-3 question and spending 20+ minutes on Passages 1 and 2 on RC. As you can imagine, I'm burning through a lot of time in the beginning/middle of sections, and it's costing me quite a bit of time and points towards the end.

Sometimes I get stuck on a question because of two tricky contenders, but most of the time it's because I know I can figure it out but I panic and start jumbling up my diagrams and refuse to move on from the question. I know that I should just flag it and come back to it, but I don't trust myself to have enough time!

This hasn't always been an issue for me, but I think I recently slipped into a very bad habit of needing to be 100% confident of every correct answer before moving on. How do I learn to trust 70-80% confidence on an answer?

Thanks in advance!

Hey guys!! Who else is taking the August LSAT? I'm scared ngl. How are y'alls PTs going?? I haven't hit my goal score yet I'm nervous omg but I'm getting closer.

Are some of y'alls PTs feeling much harder than others? I just did PT145 and I thought I was going to die lol. I did PT144 last week and it felt like a breeze in comparison. I'm scared for the August test: hopefully it won't feel impossibly evil lmfao.

Are y'all doing any specific studying techniques? Do you feel prepared? How are y'all planning on managing test day nerves?

are there any drawbacks to writing the optional essay that some schools offer?

my main personal statement is about a unique life event that has progressed throughout my life and inspired me to pursue law; i slightly mention my identity/culture (like 2 sentences that tie into the event etc.) i want to write an optional essay more about my identity, cultural upbringing, and family household which also influences my decision to go to law school.

are there any drawbacks to this?

Does anyone else struggle with Strengthen/Weaken questions or questions that ask which answer does the "most"? I usually get down to two answer choices, but then I can find flaws in both. Once I see those flaws, neither answer feels right, and I end up overthinking which one is "less wrong." Even after review, I sometimes don't understand why one answer is considered significantly better than the other. Has anyone else dealt with this? How did you learn to compare answer choices without getting caught up looking for the "perfect" answer?

I have no clue what clicking the "Keyboard Highlight" button does on the sidebar. If it makes highlighting quicker, I would love to figure it out if anyone knows.

Hello! I was wondering if anyone knew the importance of your resume for law school applications straight out of undergraduate. I've had a few jobs and internships, but they are fairly eccentric (psychiatry, teaching, education, religion, etc). I've basically got nothing that would indicate I have an interest in the legal field.

Does anyone know how much significance T14 or T30 schools put on your resume and previous legal experience? I want to go to law school to become a lawyer, but I haven't been able to find any opportunities as an undergraduate.

Thank you!

Hey yall,

Since my ask a tutor button isn’t working, I thought I’d ask for help here. For this question, I thought the unstated premise was: tragedies and comedies major characters have moral qualities that do not reflect the worlds they are in (the logical negation of the classification of romance and satires, which is the moral qualities of major characters do reflect the worlds they are in) . But the correct answer choice, D states the moral qualities of major characters in tragedy’s and comedy’s do not change throughout the action ( the negation of the classification for tragedies and comedies)

Why is the unstated premise here AC D, the negation of the classification for tragedies and comedies rather than the unstated premise I had predicted?

I know this is a SA q btw, I’m trying to push myself to find the gap by thinking what the unstated premises are