Hey guys! Here's the official September LSAT Discussion Thread. Please keep all discussions of the September 2016 LSAT here!
Here's some ground rules, taken from my usual sticky:
We know that everyone will be excited to discuss what was on the September '16 LSAT, but mentioning
specifics about the test (e.g., "I got B for question 6" or "the 3rd LG was sequencing") can get both
us and
you in a lot of trouble with LSAC. Saying that the test was hard/easy without going into detail is okay, but anything more specific is not okay. LSAC monitors this forum.
If you're unsure what may be too specific, feel free to PM me with what you'd like to post.
The only exception is you can say which sections were real or experimental. For example, the LG with "flowers" was experimental. That's okay.
TL;DR: PLEASE don't talk specifics about September's LSAT!
Here's where you can see the current Real/Experimental Sections:
https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/8821/september-2016-lsat-real-experimental-sections-keywordsHave fun discussing!
Comments
Also there was an LR question about Caterpillars and Linoleric acid
https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/8821/september-2016-lsat-real-experimental-sections-keywords
Keep 'em coming! Feel free to PM me if you're scared of breaking rules.
Think Zephyr airlines but computer viruses. I fathom there is a very easy way to expose this game but in 9 minutes I couldn't figure it out. I had to have missed something. after all that studying just couldn't get it to click damn.
I can't talk more about it but check out zephyr. Also a water pipes game I thought had the same principals but I can't recall it. I'll look around.
https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/8821/september-2016-lsat-real-experimental-sections-keywords
Lots of people hated that Virus game :c
Thanks!
I got three LR -- is there anyone who got two who remembers which they were?
Dang that sucks on the "mis understand word question" I read it and read it and came back and read it some more and couldn't figure it out.
My fear for this test was LR was very easy and i'm worried that they might have done a really good job with wrong answer choices.
You know when you are doing games and you have all sub game-boards so you can mechanically go down the list and move right on? That was LR all three sections to a TEE. Never felt like this before but..yeah...idk.
Game 3 Sub-boards is the way to go for sure but you couldn't allow yourself to solve them all out. Had to roll with them because I don't think you could understand how the rules operate in your head. Also first time I have ever had a problem confusing rules between games and games 2 and 3 had me questioning the rules.
Hope you guys talk about the RC difficulty because I couldn't tell. Questions felt super fucking hard while passages were quite easy. idk.
On a lighter note, what a joke on that first game still took me 8 minutes bahahahaha. Might be the first ever 3 minute game. @"J.Y. Ping" this game should take you 30 seconds. srs
If anything is not allowed please tell me or edit it!
LR was quite reasonable can't remember any that really confused me.
So that Virus game (or a similar variation), was likely given as an experimental a few years back. LSAC tweaks it as necessary and uses the way students score on said games/sections in order to develop scoring scales for particular tests. Make sense?
That's why sometimes it's -11 for a 170 and other times it can be as high as like -13.
I'm hoping this one is on the -13 side. Since there were 101 questions, you'd need 88 correct for the 170
So many RRE questions!!
Reconfirm RC: lacquer artist who became an architect, plus forcing parties to fulfill contract in dispute, and CR as passage 1 something about science I think.
Computer viruses suck!
And that's the nature of the beast with RC. Maybe I felt so good about it because I had it 3rd, and had just come off of crushing an LR and what I thought was a real LG. Ugh