Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Mo Zubair
About
- Username
- Mo Zubair
- Joined
- Visits
- 1,207
- Last Active
- Roles
- Member
Comments
-
See if below helps you out: In an argument part questions, we are essentially trying to find what role a statement is playing in the argument. We are not really concerned with analyzing the argument, but we want to ensure we can label each stateme…
-
PT 72 sounds good to me.
-
Hi @"samantha.ashley92" I’d be interested. Have already done 70 and 71, but hopeing if we can do 72. Strength and weaknesses have changed over the prep period and currently I’m doing good in RC overall (comparatively). Struggling with timing, PF, …
-
Congrats! It’s such a great school and city to live in. Please PM me your state or LSN profile, if you have one. It would help. Thanks.
-
@AllezAllez21 said: Orrrrrrr. You could bring an electric razor to the testing site and then shear it off in front of the proctor if they refuse to let you in and then shout "HOW BOUT NOW?" I vote for above!!! Would be fun!!
-
Joe Biden went to Syracuse Law. Ranked even lower than McKinney. There’s that!
-
I was having extreme trouble with flaw questions as well. Here is what I did. I took dozens of flaw questions. Hid their answers. And just analyzed stimulus is extreme detail. I broke down reasoning structure and wrote details On what is/are flaw(…
-
I think improving in LG is easiest among all three section for anyone. But it's not quick. Its tedious. and simple. Most effective prescription is to foolproof logic games PT 1-35. You might not have time for all 1-35 games but the more you fool pro…
-
Oh, i remember this one. B is really tricky and a perfect (very cookie cutter type) trap laid out by LSAT writers. It is pretending to attack the premise but actually failing to do so. For me this was enough to scratch it and move on. Answer choice…
-
similar technology/apps already widely available (check Zip grade) Just a matter of getting that to work with LSAT scantron.
-
Deleted! False alarm.
-
@jkatz1488 I know this has been asked million times, but do you mind sharing your setup to record yourself while taking test? Thanks.
-
Please, please, please record tis and post this asap. Work will come in the way of me attending.
-
I will be at NYC forum!!
-
I would say at most 1/4 are based on pure science. Majority are social science. I just wish majority or may be even 00% were science and 0% based on imitations of 15th century Italian paintings. haha!
-
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-36-section-1-question-12/ I laughed out loud in a quiet section of library when JY discussed answer choice C of this question.
-
@vrendonvasquez thought i should copy you on this. I was confused aboout even if as well until i came across the discussion above. JY, himself clarified that even if is (for LSAT Purposes) not a logical indicator.
-
It’s a collection of all games from PT 1-35 formatted the way games are presented in new PTs(2 pages). It is free with Ultimate plus package. If you have PTs from 1-35, you don’t really need it unless you want all the games together at one place. I…
-
I’m opposite. Literally hate studying at my home desk. Nice libraries do the trick for me. I frequent my alma mater because because I love the library little to much. Lol
-
Don't think you can exactly say "how much". Like there are strengthening question where you are only blocking the support given to conclusion by premises from an attack. Sometimes, you're just affirming something (like data, sample) that would make…
-
Its true some people are naturally good at understanding conditional logic. Bur going over conditional logic is curriculum is still very useful because you get to learn this with LSAT strategies in background. Thus, go over Conditional Logic even if…
-
I'm in too. Looking forward for more info.
-
Hi @"side braid" add me as well, please.
-
Check PT 61 in curriculum.
-
I think this all goes back to HLS decision to allow GRE. I know, among most experts and prospective law students, the consensus was that one should not read too much into HLS decision to allow GRE as most law school will still see LSAT with more pre…
-
To answer @tringo335 , a friend of mine got in to Northwestern with 3.0 and 169. Also, he is not an URM. But had solid softs. So I would say, based on anecdotal evidence that Northwestern is splitter friendly among T14.
-
I would also recommend reviewing 7Sage Grammar lessons again. To me they were key in gaining speed. We need to be able to parse down complex sentence structure in seconds.The lessons on grammar are key.
-
Yes, alway and only negate the term you choose as Sufficient condition for group 3. That's all.
-
I would love to sign up but no NYC location available. So sad!!
-
This discussion on printing cost is very intriguing. May be, like @"Alex Divine" i should put my current job to good use. Haha!