... 3, Game 4
PT 22: Game 1, Game 2, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 28: Game 1, Game 2, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 29: Game 1, Game 2, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 30: Game 1, Game 2, ... 3, Game 4
PT 33: Game 1, Game 2, ... 3, Game 4
PT 35: Game 1, Game 2, ...
...
I started with PT 36 and now I'm on ... 46 and 156 on PT 38, 44, and 48. Within ... br />
Section 1 RC 15/28
Section 2 LR 13 ... />
Section 2 RC 16/28
Section 3 LR ... br />
Section 4 LG 21/22
... LG for PTs up to 39 (at least the ones I ... one, I fall apart (PT 74 I went -8 on LG ... recent ones, also PTs 60 - 65, and then most of 40 ... then the LG from 60-65 throughout the next 10 days ...
... I mean: Diagraming conditionals: PT 36 Section 1 question 11. Before ... should take no more than 30-35 seconds. At the end of ... some people that can do 35-1-22 by not diagramming it ... can answer the question in 28 seconds. 39 seconds with a rigorous ...
... the LG's from 1-35 as well. What the hell ... />
>
> The 1-35 LG set is 385. 5 ... past 35, so 36-80. 39 pages each (they are typically either 38 or ... every PT 3x PT 1-74, every Cambridge packet for LR ...
> @akistotle said:
> I once tried to make a list of all the common flaws.....But then I gave up. :sweat: So here is a partial list:
>
> **5) Causation confusions (correlation-causation flaws)**
> PT20.S1.Q10; ...
... me. But I'm also 28 and studying for the LSAT ... , there are others, not just 22/23 year olds who plan ... breakdown:
For instance, roughly 33% of the students who just ... +, and about 10% were 29+. That is, 33% of students were 25 ...
If anyone wants to review PT 68 with me tomorrow (Friday) over google hangout/skype. private message me and we can get started. Logical reasoning, both sections.