> @akistotle said:
> I once tried to make a list of all the common flaws.....But then I gave up. :sweat: So here is a partial list:
>
> **5) Causation confusions (correlation-causation flaws)**
> PT20.S1.Q10; ...
... else have trouble with PT 65 in particular? I've scored ... those hovering around a +24/+22. I'm working on improving ... or 50's, but PT 65 is so recent that I ... an off test with PT 65 in particular? How do I ...
... . The corresponding raw scores were 74, 69, 71, 70, and 73 ... others where I go 18/28. LR is another weird one ... around, I've done PTs 39-46 so far, and I ...
I continue to BR PT 39, and I got my ass ... people think PT 39 was much harder than 38)? I BR'd ... this exam compared to PT 38, and I used a blank ...
... 18.64%
B 223 22.97%
C 185 19 ... , last five questions
A 68 16.19%
B 88 ... 21.19%
E 96 22.86%
Total 420
A 31 14.35%
B 59 ... .76%
E 44 20.37%
Total 216
... 3, Game 4
PT 22: Game 1, Game 2, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 28: Game 1, Game 2, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 29: Game 1, Game 2, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 30: Game 1, Game 2, Game ... 3, Game 4
PT 31: Game 1, Game 2, Game ...
... />
Male: 38 Adult (38%), 17 Young, 55 Total
Female: 29 Adult, 16 ... Adult (34%), 31 Young, 65 Total
Female: 5 Adult, 30 Young, 35 ... % and eastern M:F is 65%
- Only slightly more males ... adults, you can get a 65/35 ratio without exceeding the ...
... LG for PTs up to 39 (at least the ones I ... one, I fall apart (PT 74 I went -8 on LG ... recent ones, also PTs 60 - 65, and then most of 40 ... then the LG from 60-65 throughout the next 10 days ...
... should take no more than 30-35 seconds. At the end ... that can do 35-1-22 by not diagramming it. I ... can answer the question in 28 seconds. 39 seconds with a rigorous ...