Can someone please help me understand why this is A. How does this strengthen the argument that Han purple was discovered by accident?
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-1-question-17/
I'm stumped on 18. I set my diagram up to have my shelves numbered horizontically and JY sets his up vertically. I got all of the other questions right but I just couldn't figure out 18. Can it just be a coincidence that I got the other questions right and ...
I;m sorry I read the explanation, it still makes no sense to me how A has anything to do with the lines referred to. To me C look like the best answer because it is giving tribute to the ancestors and it involves ...
Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks!
But I was under the impression that conditional statements are not comparisons. I read the first sentence as a comparison and therefore ignored it since I did not read it as a conditional statement. How should I have broken down the first sentence to see ...
I am still confused why the conclusion is adequate productivity --> high- tech technology. I negated the high tech technology part because of the "not" present in the sentence. I tried reviewing my notes and I can't find where he explains in the ...
I don't see how D is incorrect. E is obviously correct, but how is D wrong?
Professor V's book is getting people riled up over the origins of glassblowing (really exciting stuff). If V is right, then there would be not enough evidence to ...
I don't understand how A is the principle. Here is my breakdown:
The use of space satellites to study the environment is important. Problems can be identified well in advance, so people can act early. It makes sense that environmentalists ...
... itself in June, totaling 28. I started well with ... per for September., totaling 33 tests. Since I had ... my studying into smaller 30 minute chunks with plenty ... the test between 8:30 and 9:30 to simulate possible ... , and the section by 30, leaving 5 minutes to ...
Absolutely clueless on this one. I've probably watched the video 5 times, and I just don't see how B weakens the argument that is in the passage. Also, can someone look at my reasoning for A?