help would there be a circular reasoning flaw if a stimulus presents 2 premises, 1 that repeats the conclusion, and another that does not repeat the premise but has a separate flaw.
For such a ... conclusion to hold means there has ... this is true then the conclusion isn’t wrong. Why? Because ... not IG models. Baby the conclusion isn't wrong then-which ...
... supposed to accept that the conclusion is referring to factory jobs ... don’t see where the conclusion limits itself to talking about ... overall, in line with the conclusion, regardless of where geographically these ...
I know, ... /w premises and conclusion, rather than just the conclusion itself?
... to Drew before, the conclusion is not invalidated, b/ ... SB else.
The conclusion merely states that the florist ...