Is there somewhere on 7sage to purchase the logic games bundle to foolproof the games. I thought I had seen it somewhere but now I can't seem to find it.
... is. I have missed 1 game and 1 one RC passage for ... of fool proofing games from PT1-35 so I hope by September ... finish all the games in 35 minutes, but I am wondering ...
Why foolproof 1-35 in particular? I will have ... however touched a pre-19 PT. I'm foolproofing some of ... need to be done with PT1-35 or is that just a ...
... down from -3 average to -1/0? I am currently averaging ... have done every game from PT1-35 multiple times and am not ... , but I tend to make 1 costly error like misreading a ...
... foolproofing all logic games from PT1-35 the past 2 months now ... . I am currently on PT 19 and foolproofing until mastery ... on a normal game averaging 1 or 2 missed questions. Logic ... I said, i'm on PT 19 and I still have ...
How are you all fool proofing the logic games from PT1-35 given the flex format? Are you still printing them out or doing them online and using scrap paper?
I mean every game in the LSAT game syllabus of the ultimate package - the lessons listed by type... not the extra games added at the end from PT1 - 35... I'm doing those now as timed drills...
Patrick, I know 7sage sells a logic games bundle in the add-on section. It includes all games from PT1-35 which will give you lots of material to work with. If you want more games past 35, then cambridge lsat sells them also.
I'm asking since I also have PT1-35 and I read on the LSAT Trainer website were they have all of the questions from PT1-35 listed and which question type it is. So how much would I benefit from the Cambridge packages? Do they offer video explanations?
Oh. Additional games, basically if you go to http://7sage.com/logic-game-explanations/ they are only explanations. You can purchase the LG bundle to access all of the games from PT1-35 under the Courses tab and then go to Extensions and addons
Would there be any case to go ahead and download all the problem sets too? I know the main cause for concern in this is the PT PDfs, but aren't the problem sets derivatives of PT1-35?