I swear I remember learning in one of the lessons that the lawgic if A then B and C can be rewritten as if A and B then C and vise versa but I can't find that lesson anywhere and am not sure if I just made that rule up in my head. Is this lawgic logical?
... don’t understand where this rule ” For conditionals, A and B ... /how to use this new rule in context with a question ... on the LSAT. Is the rule just referring to when you ... it, is by using that rule. Like I don't see ...
For the life of me, I cannot understand the level 5 difficulty questions for PSA. I can get the lower and medium difficulty questions correct, but it seems like the higher difficulty just isn't clicking. Does anyone have any tips or ...
... . I understand the idea of "rule and application", and I know ... should be looking for a rule where the premises in the ... stimulus triggers the rule, but I keep getting it ...
Forget what I said before about hitting "Save and Score LSAT" without entering in any answers - if you do that the explanations won't show up properly. I'm working on an alternate way to see all explanations.
... recognize anything then apply each rule one by one. After you ... if you've exhausted every rule the rest are simply free ... />
If your getting the rule replacement questions on the recent ...
@glvogel7, I have to say JY's course is really brilliant and insightful. Hope you can enjoy the study and forget time flies! Finish the course as soon as you can and begin drilling !