For LR clearly. When you see a question involves heavy Lawgic say MBT MBF Parallel reasoning etc.. Do you start mapping the lawgic right away or read it first then read it again and Map it out?
I was just wondering based upon the question stem, how can you tell if they want to to find the sufficient vs. the necessary assumption and vice versa.
Has anyone used Manhattan Prep vs. Testmasters for private tutoring?
Trying to see which is better. I'm not referring to the group courses, just the tutors.
Hi all, hypothetical here. If you were planning to go into public interest, and you got a full ride to a T-6 (or Penn eg) vs HYS, would you take the full ride? How about if it were T-4 full ride vs HYS?
... be much need for using Lawgic language (ex: A some B ... is a large need for Lawgic language. Should we only use ... Lawgic language for those types of ... a strategy for this? Can Lawgic language be used for all ...