... on here with a 170+ diagnostic... :open_mouth:
> >
@LSATSniper posted above that his diagnostic was a 169. I remember ... one someone had in the low 170s. It is really hard ...
... on here with a 170+ diagnostic... :open_mouth:
> > > ... ; @LSATSniper posted above that his diagnostic was a 169. I remember ... one someone had in the low 170s. It is really hard ...
... on here with a 170+ diagnostic... :open_mouth:
> > > ... ; @LSATSniper posted above that his diagnostic was a 169. I remember ... one someone had in the low 170s. It is really hard ...
... on here with a 170+ diagnostic... :open_mouth:
> > > ... ; @LSATSniper posted above that his diagnostic was a 169. I remember ... one someone had in the low 170s. It is really hard ... higher than the low 170's on a cold diagnostic because the ...
... on here with a 170+ diagnostic... :open_mouth:
> > ... LSATSniper posted above that his diagnostic was a 169. I ... someone had in the low 170s. It is really ... than the low 170's on a cold diagnostic because ... , you claim a 168 diagnostic so you are no " ...
... on here with a 170+ diagnostic... :open_mouth:
> > > ... ; @LSATSniper posted above that his diagnostic was a 169. I remember ... one someone had in the low 170s. It is really hard ...
... on here with a 170+ diagnostic... :open_mouth:
> > > ... ; @LSATSniper posted above that his diagnostic was a 169. I remember ... higher than the low 170's on a cold diagnostic because the ... had a high diagnostic, but not high-160s/low-170s. His 180 ...
... on here with a 170+ diagnostic... :open_mouth:
> > & ... higher than the low 170's on a cold diagnostic because the ... had a high diagnostic, but not high-160s/low-170s. His 180 ... section types before taking a diagnostic.
>
> And ...
... on here with a 170+ diagnostic... :open_mouth:
> > & ... higher than the low 170's on a cold diagnostic because the ... had a high diagnostic, but not high-160s/low-170s. His 180 ... section types before taking a diagnostic.
> >
> ...
... on here with a 170+ diagnostic... :open_mouth:
> > > ... ; @LSATSniper posted above that his diagnostic was a 169. I remember ... higher than the low 170's on a cold diagnostic because the ... had a high diagnostic, but not high-160s/low-170s. His 180 ...
... to get from a 153 diagnostic to a 165 in December ... with a weak first score. Retake and Reapply is the only ... you end up needing to retake in June.
I didn't take a true diagnostic, but estimate it to have been somewhere low 140s. Got 176 on the actual exam (although it took me two takes). You can do it! Just got to keep pushing!
... the June 2018 LSAT). My diagnostic was a 149 and a167 ... 175 LSAT due to my low GPA (3.1). 149 to ... my BR was167 on the diagnostic I'm hoping it's ... blind review score for a diagnostic is very encouraging. Make sure ...
... ;
> I think my diagnostic likely be similar to my ... first diagnostic and it will be discouraging ... cost unless you are running low on fresh PTs. If you ...