I was PTing at 165, but know that my question stem ID was weak, and I did not hit -0 in logic games. I actually did pretty poorly in the Logic Games on my LSAT which was September's exam.
Don't know too much about LSAC account expiration but worse case scenario I would say register and then delay to September test later on, not sure if the potential hassle(if there is one) is worth the $84 but its an option
... to 100 (does not include 0)
• Ex: Some ... />
Upper bound: 100
• 0 is not included in Some ... br />
• All- Some… Not… (0-99)
• Ex: All cats ... pretentious.
Not all 0-99 Some... are not... ... are brave.
None 0 No... are... No dogs ...
I'm thinking about taking 1 PT per week with 5 sections. My reason being that I want to include an extra LG section from the LG bundle. Therefore, I think it will help in me in getting close to -0 or -2 in games.
@harrismegan YES! We need to practice more on RC somehow. I have seen an increase but nowhere near my LG which is -3 the max. I'm still working on getting -0 lol
I also just saw your score for DC. You're in the 170s or close if you can bring that games section to a donut (-0). Do the foolproof method for games and look at games over and over and over again.