Just go in order and you'll be fine. You need to learn to delay gratification a bit so don't start blowing through all the fun LG stuff, you'll need it later to break up the LR/RC monotony.
... you're naturally good at LR or RC and games are bad ... major short-term improvement. If LR/RC really lag, that's where ... harder to learn/master than LG.
... LG I had!! Was your experimental LR? My format was LRRCLR / LRLG. I thought LG ... ok. First LR was alright, I suck at RC anyway so found ... that a little difficult, 2nd LR was ... kinda hard and 3rd LR was ok-ish ...
@Pacifico would u suggest buying section packs (LG, LR, RC) for tests 1-35 for purposes of drilling & BR and then buy newer full PrepTests fur purposes of just taking entire exams timed (and then BR after of course)
... 166 due to -9 in LG. The 166 was the only ... questions in any section except LG. My BR score was probably ... I normally had in RC and LR. In LG, I had never been ...
I feel like I'm not being clear. I always BR all of LG because LG is a real problem for me. Outside of that, most of my mistakes are careless confidence errors. I'm not doing that much changing of my answers or learning during LR/RC BR.
Im in the same boat. LR and LG have clicked but RC is beast. I feel like it cannot be done. Im undecided on whether i should do kind of okay on 4 passages (skipping lots of questions) or slamdunking 3 (but probably still getting 1 or 2 wrong).
I am curious as to what you guys feel was the relative difficulty of each section as compared to recent prep-tests? Like, do you think the LR was "easy"? The RC? LG? Or do you all think it was pretty standard?