... confused between the NotBoth Rule and the Biconditional (AlwaysTogether/NeverTogether) Rule. I am ... as a NotBoth, and the second statement as a NeverTogether. So my ... a rule as a [NotBoth Rule] or a [Nevertogether/alwaysapart Rule], especially under ...
... bi-conditional (alwaysapartnevertogether) and (2) would be a typical not-both rule. always apartnevertogether bi-conditional?OR would the ... on the other, so you never have to really deal with ...
... " be together, then:
> - is A not B and B not A ... necessarily created)? because they are alwaysapart/nevertogether?
>
> In ... /#/discussion/14156/confusing-bi-conditional-vs-not-both-in-lg
@Micaela_OVO
Thanks, if I add the word 'always' to that rule (M and N cannot always be selected together), would that turn this notboth rule into a biconditional (alwaysapart, nevertogether)?
... said:
what would then "alwaysapart, nevertogether' rule look like?
< ... what you mean by "alwaysapart, nevertogether". For a standard in ... "M and N are nevertogether" just means M and ... most of the time "nottogether" is not a biconditional.
... G serves." This is the **alwaysapart, nevertogether biconditional because the rule states ... they both indicate the same idea that they have to be alwaysapart ... we know that they are alwaysapart and nevertogether. Both of our chains indicate ...
... indicator. I confuse notboth with alwaysapart sometimes and it effects ... />
initially translated these as notboth. is it because its an ... game that they are forever apart
... />
both are translated as notboth rules according to lesson ...
... clarify when to use notboth (F---->/C) vs a bi-conditional ... in or out together. Whereas I should use the notboth representation when ... while the variables do not have to be together, there are other ...
... I'm having issues with "notboth" "or" and biconditionals, particularly in ... "notboth"? A list of common game rules that imply the neverapart biconditional ...
... ----> /N, which is a "notboth" rule. However, when given a ... and when to use a notboth rule? What triggers the ... ? The rule "F is not included in the same group ... spoke to me as a "notboth" rule, but could also speak ... -conditional [(either) or but notboth].
In a rule like "Either J or K are selected, but notboth are selected" in an In Out Game, why is it represented as Jnot K and not J double not arrow K?? Wouldnt J double not arrow K mean that both are not selected?