Not quite sure if this is the appropriate category to ask this question, but here goes...
I just finished the "Intro to Arguments" lesson and wanted more practice, so I returned to the June 2007 Practice Test. As I went through Section 2, I ...
If anyone wants to review PT 68 with me tomorrow (Friday) over google hangout/skype. private message me and we can get started. Logical reasoning, both sections.
* Premise:
- TV news watchers have NO expectations of careful discussion of public issues.
- newspaper readers have the expectation of careful discussion of public issues.
* Conclusion: In contrast to regular newspaper ...
I took PT 46 yesterday after upgrading my ... LG, and -1 RC. On PT 50 I got annihilated on ... , -1 RC from -14 LR..). PT 51 was "in between" 50 ... LR than I did on PT 50 but not as well ... as I did on PT 46 (-6 LR).
... .
I'll have a PT where I bomb reading comp ...
I'll have a pt where I bomb an LR ... />
Almost all of my PT's lately have been like ... , I cannot put a full PT together. I'll do good ... from section to section per PT to PT. anyone else having this ...
... and took my first timed PT last week ago. I blind ... reviewed this PT as well. The timed and ... I tried to take another PT (62) but in the middle ... . I also decided to scrap PT 62 entirely since I was ...
... am about to begin my PT practice. I would like to ... of these questions in older PT's and go back to ... will increase the number of PT's I take per week ...
I took my first PT after finishing the course ... I expect on my next PT? Or does it vary ... be a normal improvement from PT to PT. I kind of feel ... a 163 on my next PT but that's impossible right ... share their experience from their PT progress I would appreciate it ...