HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 4 | 14.4K | 19.8K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 20 | 4.5K | 5.4K |
-
PT30.S4.Q20 - Consumer advocate: The introduction of a new drugThere is a myth out there that on Strengthen questions the LSAT will always give us four definitive non-strengtheners and only one strengthener. But …
... correct answer to a Strengthen question. And that makes sense, because ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-20/ -
PT30.S4.Q20 - Consumer Advocate: The introduction of a new drug<font color="red"> **Admin edit: Please review our <a href="https://7sage.com/discussion/#/discussion/15/forum-rules">forum rules</a>. Posting lice…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-20/
I thought B ... -
difference between Suff. Assumptions vs. Nec. Assumptions that act as a "bridge."Hi everyone, I'm confused about the difference between Sufficient Assumptions vs. Necessary Assumptions that act as a "bridge." I understand th…
... as a trap when the question stem asks for a necessary ... , PT 44, Section 4, question 7 is relevant. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-4-question ... -
Difference between MSS and MBTSo, during this video JY says that answer choice A is wrong because of the strict standards of a must be true question. I was just wondering if A. w…
... of a must be true question. I was just wondering if ... if it was a MSS question. Basically, if I still have ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-86-section-4-question-20/ -
PT30.S4.Q20-- consumer advocate: the introduction of a new drugHi, Based on what I have read from answer explanations so far, this logical reasoning question seems to break the "cardinal rule" of there only be…
... so far, this logical reasoning question seems to break the "cardinal ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-20/ -
PT20.S4.Q20 - The national land-reclamation programAre there two flaws in this stimulus? Armand is a mathematician so interior ministry isn’t his area of expertise and even if he doesn’t think the pro…
... :** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-20-section-4-question-20/ -
PT44.S4.Q20 - Acme Retirement PlanHey guys, For this question, I’m having trouble seeing why we must assume that “having a plan chosen for them by employers” must mean the winners …
... guys,
For this question, I’m having trouble seeing ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-4-question-20/ -
PT13.S4.Q7 - Murray and JaneIn PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You are wrong to make this claim", does he mean that the claim being made is wrong? It is one thin…
In PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You ... very relevant to answering the question, though not absolutely necessary.
PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question"** -
PTB.S4.Q25 - Some residents of Midville claim...Hi everyone! I just took five practice questions and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone has this question open or has worked on it recently,…
... and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone has this question open or ... -
Strengthening Causal ReasoningWhen it comes to strengthening causal reasoning, I understand that offering other instances where a cause leads to an effect (cause -> effect) will a…
... . One particular question that shows this logic is PT 66 Section 4 Question 12.
LSAT PT69 (June 2013) and all video explanations now availableVideo explanations for LSAT Prep Test 69 (June 2013) are finally here! You get individual video explanations for LG, LR, and RC, all done by JY. …
... that the videos for Section 4, Questions 19, 20, and 21 are ... 69-section-4-question-19/
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-69-section-4-question-20/< ... br /> http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-69-section-4-question-21 ...Necessary and sufficientI understand that this is probably a dumb question but I keep having difficulties with flaw questions that have answers that "confuse necessary and s…
... when I was working on PT 73 section 4, question 25:
I ...How Do I Look Up Particular LR or Reading Comp Questions?Hey, I'm looking for an alternative to The Trainer's explanation of 29:4:20. Id like to see what Jy has to say about this question because im still h…
Or http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-4-question-20/PT77.S4.Q20 - selena claims to have psychic powersHello 7sagers, does anyone have any idea how to get the correct answer of question 20 of the second section of logical reasoning from dec 15 lsat? Tr…
I think you may be talking about Section four and not section two. S4 has the psychic power question:
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-4-question-20
Edited title to reflect that!"A few" versus "Few"Hi all, So I know "a few" is logically equivalent to "some" (more than 1), but for "few," can we say that it is logically equivalent to the opposi…
... is highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section 4 Question 21 Answers D & ...Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation.Name the trickiest LR tactic used by test writers!This could be anything from the subtle way an assumption is introduced in the stimulus to a misleading QS. I'll give two: 1) The Bait 'n Switch as…
... correct AC in a MSS question.
"A premise booster ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-4-question-20/What Exactly is an Intensive?I see them mentioned on here a lot, but, aside from @"Cant Get Right"'s webinars, I rarely see them discussed or practiced much. Could someone explai…
... took an intensive over about 4-5 days for necessary assumption ... a necessary assumption. Consider: PT 39-Section 4 Question 19. While I started scrambling ... example of this is 37-4-19. These two (among others ...Does anyone else think that the recent PT LR Qs punish prephrases?Ok, I might be exaggerating when I say "punish prephrases," but I noticed that the prephrases, especially for the flaw/ assumption type questions, do…
... wonderful advice. I have one question: how is strengthening/ weakening the ... example take a look at PT 58 Section 4 question 23.
The ... a five star difficulty strengthening question. I am sure a ... of the difficulty of this question is answer choice "A" ...Mistaking sufficiency for necessity vs mistaking necessity for sufficiencyI'm a bit confused about the technical differences between the errors of (1) mistaking sufficiency or necessity and (2) mistaking necessity for suffi…
... has been one parallel flaw question I can think of that ... . That question is: Pt 51 Section 1 Question 20. That is the only question I can ... to do beyond or BR PT 56.
In my ... the descriptor for the flaw question after we spotted the mistake ...PTA.S4.Q25 - People's intentions cannot be...Can someone provide an explanation for this question? #help
Hi!
This is my first time using this service, so thank you for clarifying. It is PT A, Section 4, Question 25.Hardest LG - PT 65 - Section 2 - Game 4Doing this question makes me feel like I'm being abused. It's like the LSAT writers are getting some sick pleasure out of tricking me into choosing t…
Doing this question makes me feel like I' ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-65-section-2-game-4/PT 69 BR call - UPDATE Section 4 LR Meeting Wednesday, March 24th, at 6pm EST. [Link Posted]All scoring levels welcome. Flex test version. Requirements: - Have taken the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the 2nd LR se…
... the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the ... 2nd LR section will not be ... won't be doing every question on the test, just those ... />
**UPDATE: PT69 section 4 LR (second LR section) BR call - Wednesday, March ...PT 46 S4 Game 3 Question# 12<i>Hey 7Sagers, had someone email me with a question and I thought you guys could help out! Here it is:</i> I have a question or comment regar…
... regarding LSAT 46, game 3, section 4, question 12. The game ask for ... this except for N = 2. With L = 4, that places L immediately ... ; L = 1, 2, 4; N =1,2, 4, and O = 1,2,4,5
For order choices question 12 ...20.4.26 (Resolve-Reconcile-Explain Questions Problem Set 10)I see why A, C,D, and E are incorrect, but I cannot figure out how B doesn't resolve the paradox. Here is the video explanation: http://7sage.com/ls…
... : http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-20-section-4-question-26/
Smoking in ...[Spoiler Alert] LR Issues PT 69 - Section 4There were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers that I could not seem to justify even after BRing, not sure if this type …
... were several questions in this section that seemed to provide answers ... did this question it seemed as if it presented 2 necessary conditions ... year -
1. important;
2. well written.
... correct logical representation for this question?Logical Reasoning: StatisticsAfter combing through numerous tests looking for ways to improve my logical reasoning score, I isolated a concept throughout the preptests that I was…
... but now i'm drinking 20 more cokes a day than ... of water. That is only 20 percent. Now I only drink ... .com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-22/
PT 34
"A ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-2-question-13/
For ...Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT.
PT17.S2.Q11; PT22 ...Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... one sufficiency-neccesity confusion per PT.
> PT17.S2.Q11 ...
