HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 4 | 14.4K | 19.8K |
| question | 29.2K | 48.6K |
| 8 | 5.8K | 7.1K |
-
PT 50 Section 4 Q22Help [Mod edit] For reference: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-22/
Help
[Mod edit]
For reference: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-50-section-4-question-22/ -
"Only" Question<b></b>I'm having trouble translating "only" statements... can anyone help me out? For example: <b>Only</b> the best artworks are beautiful. (P…
... . (PT 49, Section 4, Question 16)
Since "only" is a group 2 indicator ... -
June 2007 LSAT Section 4 Question 13Hi there, I am going through my BR of the June 2007 LSAT. I got question 13 of section 4 wrong, so I am trying to understand why B is wrong but E …
... 2007 LSAT. I got question 13 of section 4 wrong, so I am ... -
Pt 54 section 4 question 24"Downtown petropolis boasted over 100 large buildings 5 years ago". By poe I kind of am able to get to the answer E , bUT I don't understand why th…
... healthy economy?
This question is the only one I ... -
PT3.S4.Q20 - Argument Part QuestionCan anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me.
Can anyone explain their reasoning for PT 3 Section 4 Question 20 - will never understand it for the life of me. -
How to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
... across several PT's. For example, see PT 127, Section 2, Question 24. Just ... For example, see PT 131 Section 3 Question 7. PT B Section 4 Question 18 involves the ... D in PT 19 Section 2 Question 18.
PT 151 Section 2 Question 12 involves ... -
Does anyone have any NA advice to make it clickI am scoring somewhere between -4 to -6 on LR now (yesterday I had a -11 but I was frenzied and used the "5" setting on the 7sage proctor when I alre…
... assumption on that question..
2.Look out for ... of this: check out PT 27 section 4 Question 20. Here we have ... a cross-section of several ... lesson. A necessary assumption question that has an assumption ... -
Help with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... phenomena can be found on PT 49 Section 2 Question 7. I've been ... 'm thinking here of PT 53 Section 1 Question 8. I had to read ... -
Math/Algebra ProblemsMath and I have never been close. Now with Lsat, I often come across questions that J.Y. marks as "high-school algebra" or "mathematical question in …
... look a particularly daunting example: PT 27 Section 4 Question 14. What I recommend ... 50 books is for worker 2. It must be, like the ... brother and worker 2 is me.
My question for you ... -
How to do flaw q when you can't see the flaw/prephaseI know JY advises against moving onto the ACs without coming up with a prephase for flaw questions, but there are unfortunately usually 2-3 flaw ques…
... right. The older tests (PT 1-PT 20) are really good ... the sufficient/necessary flaw on PT A section 4 question 20 mean? Suggestion #1 ... : know them.
2.If you have no idea ... remaining.
4.Drill that question after and eliminate that ... -
PT 29/ Section 1/ Question 8Can anyone explain the incorrect answer choice "B" because I'm having trouble getting through the convoluted way it's written?
Can anyone explain the incorrect answer choice "B" because I'm having trouble getting through the convoluted way it's written? -
Flaw questions: Sufficiency necessity confusionI got a question for high scorers; when you see an argument like PT 22 - Section 4 - Question 21 that have sufficiency necessity confusion but you de…
... you see an argument like PT 22 - Section 4 - Question 21 that have sufficiency ... because when I read the question I thought it probably is ... -
Preptests misspelling or missing words?As I am going through the CC I have noticed in at least two PTs that there have been a misspelled or missing word in a question. The first time I…
... or missing word in a question.
The first ... talking about "Otterville" but the question and answers used "Outerville". ... game changing. In my PT 22, Section 4, Question 14, answer choice B ... a difference between their PT's language and what ... -
PTA.S4.Q10 - the therapist's reply to the interviewerWhat does answer choice A mean to you? Coming out of Feb 1996 PT 14 Section 4 Question 10. Question stem: The therapist's reply to the interviewe…
... of Feb 1996 PT 14 Section 4 Question 10.
Question stem: The therapist ... the meaning. I thought the question showed a circular reasoning flaw ... -
difference between Suff. Assumptions vs. Nec. Assumptions that act as a "bridge."Hi everyone, I'm confused about the difference between Sufficient Assumptions vs. Necessary Assumptions that act as a "bridge." I understand th…
... as a trap when the question stem asks for a necessary ... , PT 44, Section 4, question 7 is relevant. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-44-section-4-question ... -
PT13.S4.Q7 - Murray and JaneIn PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You are wrong to make this claim", does he mean that the claim being made is wrong? It is one thin…
In PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You ... very relevant to answering the question, though not absolutely necessary.
PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question"** -
PTB.S4.Q25 - Some residents of Midville claim...Hi everyone! I just took five practice questions and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone has this question open or has worked on it recently,…
... and for PT B, section 4, question 25. If anyone has this question open or ... -
PT9.S4.Q20 - Of every 100 burglar alarms police answer...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is C for PT 9, Section 4, Question 20? -
Strengthening Causal ReasoningWhen it comes to strengthening causal reasoning, I understand that offering other instances where a cause leads to an effect (cause -> effect) will a…
... . One particular question that shows this logic is PT 66 Section 4 Question 12.
Necessary and sufficientI understand that this is probably a dumb question but I keep having difficulties with flaw questions that have answers that "confuse necessary and s…
... when I was working on PT 73 section 4, question 25:
I ...Search function?Is there a specific search box for the discussion board (not control + F)? Am I just blind?
... annoyed if you ask a question that has already been asked ... before I posted!
PT 66 Section 4 Question 20.
Conditionals ..."A few" versus "Few"Hi all, So I know "a few" is logically equivalent to "some" (more than 1), but for "few," can we say that it is logically equivalent to the opposi…
... is highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section 4 Question 21 Answers D & ...Causation Question StrategyWould somebody mind looking at the strategy below and letting me know if it makes sense/I've included everything? Thanks! On weakening questi…
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation.What Exactly is an Intensive?I see them mentioned on here a lot, but, aside from @"Cant Get Right"'s webinars, I rarely see them discussed or practiced much. Could someone explai…
... took an intensive over about 4-5 days for necessary assumption ... a necessary assumption. Consider: PT 39-Section 4 Question 19. While I started scrambling ... example of this is 37-4-19. These two (among others ...Does anyone else think that the recent PT LR Qs punish prephrases?Ok, I might be exaggerating when I say "punish prephrases," but I noticed that the prephrases, especially for the flaw/ assumption type questions, do…
... wonderful advice. I have one question: how is strengthening/ weakening the ... example take a look at PT 58 Section 4 question 23.
The ... a five star difficulty strengthening question. I am sure a ... of the difficulty of this question is answer choice "A" ...PT14.S4.Q9 - anyone who supports the new tax planI'm really having trouble with this question. Am I supposed to approach it as a sufficient assumption question though it's a flaw question? Thanks in…
I've been really looking into sufficient/necessary flaws lately. A particularly difficult way in which the test writers described the flaw appears on PT A section 4 question 20.PTA.S4.Q25 - People's intentions cannot be...Can someone provide an explanation for this question? #help
Hi!
This is my first time using this service, so thank you for clarifying. It is PT A, Section 4, Question 25.Hardest LG - PT 65 - Section 2 - Game 4Doing this question makes me feel like I'm being abused. It's like the LSAT writers are getting some sick pleasure out of tricking me into choosing t…
Doing this question makes me feel like I' ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-65-section-2-game-4/PT 69 BR call - UPDATE Section 4 LR Meeting Wednesday, March 24th, at 6pm EST. [Link Posted]All scoring levels welcome. Flex test version. Requirements: - Have taken the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the 2nd LR se…
... the PT or at least the section you want to BR (section 4, the ... 2nd LR section will not be ... won't be doing every question on the test, just those ... />
**UPDATE: PT69 section 4 LR (second LR section) BR call - Wednesday, March ...
