HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 21 | 1K | 1.2K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 3 | 22.5K | 32.2K |
-
PT 72 Section 3Is section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT 72 is weird and I shouldn't be discouraged by lower scores on this test than the others.…
Is section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT 72 ... first LR section of this PT but I did horribly on section 3. What ... are your experiences with this PT? -
PT 21.S3.Q16Can anybody help me with this question, because it is driving me crazy. Why is B wrong? The stimulus clearly states "**any**given individual molecu…
... :** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-3-question-16/ -
How to select an experimental section to add to a full PT?Hey 7sagers, I'm wondering from what sample of experimental sections you guys select to simulate a real LSAT exam. Do you choose them from earlie…
... you choose them from earlier PT's (1~40's) or ... (e.g. Full PT 71+ PT 65 Section 3 as an experimental section)?
PT into experimental sections would be ... loss of a full recent PT.
What do you ... -
Logic Chain (ish) questionHello, I've got a common question about linking up a logic chain. I just re-watched the video lesson but it's not precisely the answer to my questio…
... /> My question is from PT 47 section 3, number 21. According to the video ... -
LSAT Prep Test 32, October, 2000, Section 3, Questions 19-24, Game 4, Rule 2LSAT Prep Test 32 October, 2000 Section 3, Questions 19-24 Game 4 2nd Rule States That G Is In Slot 1, So G Cannot Be In Slot 7. Contrpos…
Road to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
Complete PT 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark ...PT 21.S2.Q15 - Setting executives salariesI don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companie…
I don't understand how executives from other companies setting salaries higher could have an impact on the salaries of executives from other companies?
**Admin Note:** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-2-question-15/Incorrect Answer- PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13The correct answer to PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13 is C. It was marked incorrect by the Problem Set program.
The correct answer to PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13 is C. It was marked incorrect by the Problem Set program.Logical Reasoning February 1997 section 3 question 25For PrepTest February 1997 - Section 3 - Question 25, what is the difference between C and D and what makes D correct? Super confused
For PrepTest February 1997 - Section 3 - Question 25, what is the difference between C and D and what makes D correct? Super confusedHow to Understand "most" questions that the curriculum FAILS to teach how to solve?I feel like I'm getting burned by questions that don't use the exhaustive formal logic to solve them. For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14…
... />
For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14 uses 'most' in ... #1 response.' PT 138 Section 3 Question 4 also involves ... example, see PT 131 Section 3 Question 7. PT B Section 4 Question ... ). For example, PT 133 Section 3 Question 21. Another example where ...Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... br /> 6) Circular Reasoning (PT17, Section 2, Q2; PT17, S2, Q20 ... /> 16) Relative v. absolute (PT 53, Section 1, Q22)
... Confusing part v. whole (PT 47, Section 3, Q25) I also describe ... PT17, S3, Q16)
21) Beliefs v. facts
Help with Flaw Type ExamplesHey everyone, I am having a hard time with Flaw Questions. I know we are supposed to memorize the common argument flaws but that is where my struggle…
... > 6) Circular Reasoning (PT17, Section 2, Q2; PT17, S2, Q20 ... ; 16) Relative v. absolute (PT 53, Section 1, Q22)
> ... Confusing part v. whole (PT 47, Section 3, Q25) I also describe ... Q16)
>
> 21) Beliefs v. facts
> ...Confusing necessary and sufficient conditionsHello all, I believe I understand the concept of sufficient and necessary conditions and their relationship, however, I am confused when in a flaw qu…
... looks like. For example, in PT 64, section 3, question 11 - one of ...Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... practice tests (PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser" and PT 3 Section 2 #3 "In Europe ... .
For #3 from PT 3 section 2, I was between answer ...PT 41, Section 3, Question 3I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR. BUT, I watched the video and I reasone…
I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR.
BUT, I watched the video and I reasoned it differently.
We're taught that, if we're given a premise, we have to take it to be true, ...Science Experiments in LR QuestionsPowerscore claims that recently PTs have had a lot more science experiment questions in LR. I've obviously taken a bunch of science classes and know …
... />
For example, on PT 71 Section 3 #4, E is the right ...PT 23 Section 3 Question 12Sooooo inferences are usually much more clear and this one is giving me a lot of trouble. I gave B a considerable amount of thought, but I felt like …
Sooooo inferences are usually much more clear and this one is giving me a lot of trouble. I gave B a considerable amount of thought, but I felt like it's a flaw because it goes from health food enthusiasts to saying in general, those who take XYZ will ...PT 73 Section 3 Game 2Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z? For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X c…
Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z?
For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X can go before Z as long as Y goes after Z. I am having trouble with my fundamentals, please help, ...Mapping Logical Reasoning: Do we have a set of questions available?Hi Everyone! I've been doing a lot of work recently with memorizing valid inferences that can be made from conditional and inter-sectional statem…
... set of questions similar to PT 43, Section 3, Question 9, beginning "Most ...Abstract language.I have an issue with the harder flaw reasoning questions. 99 times out of 100 i can point out the flaw. Hell i can make a stand up comedy routine abo…
... abstract language down. (random example. PT 41 section 3 question 20)
PT's. sort of just wanted ...[Ended] Free RC Tutoring - Economics Passage [6 P.M. EDT]Hey Everyone, This week again we will keep practicing the low-high resolution summary method. The point of practice is to get better at what we a…
... will be doing **PT 8, Section 3, Passage 2**. The PT is available for ...Conditional Reasoning; Relation to Premises and Conclusions?Hello Folks, I posted this in the powerscore forum as well, but it looks a little dead over there. I was hoping I might be able to pick someone's …
... , I believe this is from PT 31 Section 3 Number 22.
PT21.S3.Q16 - researchers studying artificial sweetenersI chose answer choice B. I understand this is an MSS but answer choice C seems too strong to me. I'm not convinced of it. Any thoughts? https:…
I chose answer choice B.
I understand this is an MSS but answer choice C seems too strong to me. I'm not convinced of it.
Any thoughts?
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-3-question-16/Confusion about : "The {person}'s argument proceeds by...."I am a little confused about questions in which a scientist/critic/psychologist/whatever will state their opinion on something, often giving context …
... this is Question 20 from PT 68 section 3. I missed this question ...Possible Substitution Equivalency StrategyHi. Im studying for the June LSAT and (like most people) am having trouble with SE questions. While watching on of JY's game explanation videos for P…
... 's game explanation videos for PT 66 and noticing some differences ... to this in this case (PT 66, section 3, Q11). However, upon my ...PT21.S3.Q16 - Researchers studying artificial sweetenerswhat's the difference between any given molecule of substance and molecule of any substance in this case.... substance is really broad... not like th…
... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-3-question-16/Distorting Argument - Flaw Answer ChoiceCan someone provide me with an example of what "distorts an argument against X, and then attacks this distorted argument" would look like? PT C2, …
Can someone provide me with an example of what "distorts an argument against X, and then attacks this distorted argument" would look like?
PT C2, Section #3, Question #6 Answer Choice DMost Ridiculous LSAT QuestionCan we all agree that question number 7 of LSAT 21 Section 3 has got to be the most ridiculous quesiton of all time. So just because John's face was …
Can we all agree that question number 7 of LSAT 21 Section 3 has got to be the most ridiculous quesiton of all time. So just because John's face was reflected in a mirror, his friends did not recognize him? lolwutPT21-S3-Q6- Books about architectural worksI noticed that for this question we are being presented with a principle in the stimulus. The principle used conditional logic: Intended General A…
... :** https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-3-question-06/PT21.S3.Q06 - Books about architectural worksHey guys I'm really struggling with the logic on this one when diagramming. https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-3-question-06/ I t…
... . https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-21-section-3-question-06/
I ...
