I'm trying to identify flaws. is PT 56 S3 Q10 an equivocation flaw; can you use more than a word but a concept in this type of flaw?
Is PT 52 S3 Q4 a false appeal flaw?
Is PT 54 S4 Q16 an implication flaw ?
thanks
I second @"Nilesh S"
I'm pretty sure it would be against rules to post actual screenshots of the stimulus. But if you use referencing such as "PT 35 S1 Q15" and then post your question about it, then it should be alright.
We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative effects. ...
Interesting. You're positive the NA isn't actually necessary? I'm curious about these examples. I didn't look closely at it, but PT 71.S1.Q11 seems to be about pollution. Is that the right reference? PT means PrepTest, right?
The stimulus doesn't allow us to conclude this. Grass clippings are one way to get micro-nutrients, but the stimulus doesn't say it's the ONLY way. Thus, when the ...
The only shitty chart game was PT28 Game 2 I think. The one with the languages, Rundi, Swahili etc. The first inference was more than a bit hidden. Made me feel clever after I got it though :D
First off I am literally LOLing from that gif because that's actual footage of me doing an RC section. So thanks for that. Second, should we be doing all the passages from PT28 or just the first one or two since that's all we have time to review?
... I have been doing 1 PT per day and simply attempting ... on until
Day 35: PT28, 34, and 35
Day ... />
Day 37: PT 30
Day 38: PT 31
Day ... 39: PT 32
Day ... 40: PT 33
Day ...
... of text (e.g. PT 16 S1 Game 1, and line diagrams ... (e.g. PT 9 S3 ... are part way through a PT, the annotations that were ... saved with that PT may not show up ... look strange. Sorry! If the PT is already completed, this shouldn ...