HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22.1K | 36.7K |
| 29 | 604 | 696 |
| section | 23.4K | 38.4K |
| 1 | 27.2K | 41K |
-
Experimental Section QuestionsLet me start by saying I have not taken the LSAT. With that said I have some questions. -Does everyone get the same experimental type? Could john …
... you can obviously tell which section you had an extra of ... thought I did horribly on section 1, instead of letting it get ... -
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
Feb 2000 (PTC) G4:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-c-section-1-game-4/
Dec 1994 (PT13) G4:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-13-section-1-game-4/ -
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
Oct 91 (PT3) G3:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-2-section-3-game-3/
(Personally hated this one)
Dec 92 (PT18) G4:
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-1-game-4/
(Not bad, just weird) -
Weird Games HighlightThere's been a lot of concern about weird game types appearing or potentially appearing in this era of LSAT. I think it's a healthy concern, and is p…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-1-game-4/
(Not bad ... -
how to improve on logical reasoningI feel like I am hitting a plateau on the LR section, I keep getting 7 or 8 questions wrong every time I do it. I am starting to feel sick while doin…
... :) Who told you to do PT's untimed? Unless we're ... talking about PT's from 1-36, this is, IMO ... , a HUGE waste of a PT ... -
Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... why A is incorrect. For PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser ... -
Necessary assumption woes.I currently suck at this question type. I mean I do not have a clue on what I am doing even when applying the negation test. what is a good strategy …
Check out this specific NA question. It's a great question and a great explanation by JY.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-1-question-24/ -
Confused about test dayI have not taken an official LSAT in a test center yet so I am confused how it works. When the section you are working on is done then what happe…
... is called for any given section.
After ... answer for a question in Section 1/2 if you're on ... -
Site Maintenance ongoing [Ended]Hey guys, 7Sage is undergoing maintenance and you may notice pages occasionally loading slowly. Since a lot of stuff is going on in the background…
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-59-section-1-game-4/ -
December LSAT---Is it too late to apply for upcoming cycle?I've never taken the LSAT yet and I don't believe I'll be hitting my target score come October. I want a 169+ and it's really aggravating since LG is…
... , then I can take PT's from 1-35 to keep my ... skills up on fresh PT's ... ) know there are always more PT's unless you truly have ... -
PT35.S2.P4 - ronald dworkin argues that judges arehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/ I am a long-time lurker that is gearing up for the October exam. I really…
Following up on RC: PT 35, Section 2
My specific questions ... -
Necessary and sufficientI understand that this is probably a dumb question but I keep having difficulties with flaw questions that have answers that "confuse necessary and s…
... when I was working on PT 73 section 4, question 25:
Oct 2015 LR Experimental HelpI have searched around discussion boards online and it does not seem that anyone or any group of people have identified the experimental LR from the …
... same format. The first section had only 1 disagree maybe? I also ... remember an early miscellaneous in section 1. So, to narrow down here ... , do others remember a second section with 3-4 disagree?Jon's ExplanationsI'm not sure if this has been mentioned in an earlier thread, so I apologize if I am repeating it. Jon, would it be possible for you to use a bet…
Jon's October 2008 explanations have some feedback. Explanations are great and we can still hear him. It's just not as clear as it could be: http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-55-section-1-question-06/Significant Drop in Older PT's - Help!So just to give some background I started studying for the October LSAT end of June and was PT-ing around the early160's by the time I wrote the exam…
Just two and I starting PT-ing again 1 week after I wrote October. Maybe it's too early to freak out and just got a little rusty from the week break?Advice for Dec 2015Hi everyone-I consistently practice tested from 158-161 right before the Oct LSAT and somehow drastically bombed to a 152. I am quite upset. However,…
... -75, but not all of 1-34). i was able to ... perfect score for one LR section in preptests 74 and 75 ... getting an almost perfect LG section (-1 in Oct '15 vs. -9 ...DEC 1995, Logic Game 2 (Please help me understand)Hello, I don't understand why, in the setup, the last row has to be occupied by only supervisors. It's 4 free spots and I only have 3 supervisors …
... will be in Q and 1 will be in S (at ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-17-section-1-game-2/Will the LSAT ever mention multiple flaws that could be true?Hello, Would the LSAT ever use the same flaw type that has subcategories in the same question? For example, would it ever have multiple answer choic…
PT 33 Sec 1 Q22 is a flaw - except question(each of the following accurately describes a flaw in the lawyers reasoning displayed above except).
I guess this would be an example of multiple flaws in a question.PT 69, Sec. 1, #14We debated this question for a long time in Group BR last night. While almost everyone got the correct answer, we were strongly divided about the act…
@DumbHollywoodActor said:
This explanation requires far less assumptions (especially the difficult-to-swallow “The two options give COULD be the ONLY options”) than those previously mentioned.
This is not an assumption, it's ...Games that require brute forceCan someone name a few games that require a lot of brute force. These seems to be the one that trip me up the most during LG sections and I want to d…
... than writing everything out (PT 69, Game 1 is a good example ...Search function?Is there a specific search box for the discussion board (not control + F)? Am I just blind?
Introducing: BR Group Interactive Intensive Fundamentals WorkshopsHey Gang! Before the June-testers's BR Group jumps into the PT phase, the 7Sage tutors would like to offer some free interactive sessions to work…
I'm in for all barring the PT 29, I'll be joining yall from 39 onwards!! Thank you so much for doing this and setting it up!! :DIntroducing: BR Group Interactive Intensive Fundamentals WorkshopsHey Gang! Before the June-testers's BR Group jumps into the PT phase, the 7Sage tutors would like to offer some free interactive sessions to work…
I'm in for all as well! And I'm also in for BR group starting at PT 29! Thanks @DumbHollywoodActor for organizing this :)If you're interested in the Assumption/Flaw (@blah170blah) Clinic, read this...Hey guys! I noticed that a number of you are interested in this clinic, which is so exciting (thank you for sparing me some awkward few hours with me…
Thanks for this, @blah170blah! @"GSU Hopeful" I think you literally just regurgitated my life story, word for word. I am also on track to finish the LG bundle (using the same attack strategy) by the time BR for PT 29 starts up!How Do I Look Up Particular LR or Reading Comp Questions?Hey, I'm looking for an alternative to The Trainer's explanation of 29:4:20. Id like to see what Jy has to say about this question because im still h…
Or http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-29-section-4-question-20/Official Dec. LSAT Discussion<font color=red>Admin's note:</font> Thread hijacking! I'm turning this thread into the Official Dec. LSAT Discussion. Here's some ground rules, take…
Wait...so those of us who had 3 LR, did we all have the same order? meaning section 1 was the experimental for all of us who had LR RC LR LR LG?When do we get to write our names on the answer sheet?I feel like this is a really silly question, but I tried searching on Google and on the forums here and couldn't find anything... So here goes: When …
@whykaysees said:
the section 1 instructions aren't long enough ...Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... gotten wrong include: Principle: PT 54 Section 2 Q18 (answered A, correct ... answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 (answered B, correct ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 Q15 (answered B, correct ...How does test day differ from a PT?Taking the test in a few weeks and I want to make sure I perform my best on test day. I do my best to mimic test-day conditions in terms of break/tim…
... cannot leave the room until section 1 starts. So I sat there ...
