HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 21.7K | 36.1K |
| 37 | 343 | 392 |
| section | 23K | 37.8K |
| 3 | 22.2K | 31.8K |
-
PT 72 Section 3Is section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT 72 is weird and I shouldn't be discouraged by lower scores on this test than the others.…
Is section 3 of PT 72 unusually hard? I've been told that PT 72 ... first LR section of this PT but I did horribly on section 3. What ... are your experiences with this PT? -
June Test-Takers, Week of Jan. 11th: Tues (PT 37), Sat ( PT 38)<img src="http://mittromneycentral.com/uploads/june-3.jpg"> </center> June Test Takers! Great work last week, gang! We’re making our way through …
... , Jan. 12th at 8PM ET: PT 37
Click here to join ... ).
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... -
How to select an experimental section to add to a full PT?Hey 7sagers, I'm wondering from what sample of experimental sections you guys select to simulate a real LSAT exam. Do you choose them from earlie…
... you choose them from earlier PT's (1~40's) or ... (e.g. Full PT 71+ PT 65 Section 3 as an experimental section)?
PT into experimental sections would be ... loss of a full recent PT.
What do you ... -
LSAT Prep Test 32, October, 2000, Section 3, Questions 19-24, Game 4, Rule 2LSAT Prep Test 32 October, 2000 Section 3, Questions 19-24 Game 4 2nd Rule States That G Is In Slot 1, So G Cannot Be In Slot 7. Contrpos…
Pt 37 Easy?Is PT 37 a fairly easy test overall? I scored a 165, even though usually I score in the 150s. I want to know if I’m on the right track, or just got l…
Is PT 37 a fairly easy test overall? I scored a 165, even though usually I score in the 150s. I want to know if I’m on the right track, or just got lucky on this test. Thanks! Let me know what you guys thinkRoad to 170+: Blind Review Bootcamp (Free tutoring session PT 65 Section 1 March 7th 3pm Eastern)Hi Folks: Some of you may not know how to properly blind review. What better way to learn than from a seasoned LSAT Sage? Or perhaps you just wan…
... as we blind review PT 65 LR Section 1 next Saturday
PT 65 LR Section 1 LR
Complete PT 65 Section 1 but DO NOT mark ...PT 37 BR Session | 4 pm EST on SaturdayA couple of us are getting together to do a BR session of PT 37 on Saturday. We are planning to take the test and not look at the answers and do the…
... do a BR session of PT 37 on Saturday. We are planning ...Incorrect Answer- PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13The correct answer to PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13 is C. It was marked incorrect by the Problem Set program.
The correct answer to PrepTest 1 - Section 3 - Question 13 is C. It was marked incorrect by the Problem Set program.Logical Reasoning February 1997 section 3 question 25For PrepTest February 1997 - Section 3 - Question 25, what is the difference between C and D and what makes D correct? Super confused
For PrepTest February 1997 - Section 3 - Question 25, what is the difference between C and D and what makes D correct? Super confusedHelp with LR questionsHello everyone, While going through my last few practice tests , I have noticed that I have two consistent problems regarding LR sections. 1)…
... has drilling sets from particular PT ranges, something incredibly helpful.)
PT.
Because vague ... example: today I took PT 56. Section 3 Question 10 on that exam ... 12 days ago I reviewed PT 37 Section 2 Question 19, is the ...'Even without''even without' does not seem to follow our group 3 indicator rules.... Ella can pass even without giving her presentation Using Group 3 rules I…
... on this while doing PT 37 section 2 qs 3.....such an easy qs ...Logic Chain (ish) questionHello, I've got a common question about linking up a logic chain. I just re-watched the video lesson but it's not precisely the answer to my questio…
... /> My question is from PT 47 section 3, number 21. According to the ...Confusing necessary and sufficient conditionsHello all, I believe I understand the concept of sufficient and necessary conditions and their relationship, however, I am confused when in a flaw qu…
... looks like. For example, in PT 64, section 3, question 11 - one of ...PT37.S3.G1 - a school has exactly four dormitories<i>Hey 7Sagers! One of our users is having a bit of trouble with this game and I thought you could help me out! Here's the game: http://7sage.com/ls…
... /> http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-37-section-3-game-1/
And ...Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... practice tests (PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser" and PT 3 Section 2 #3 "In Europe ... .
For #3 from PT 3 section 2, I was between answer ...PT 41, Section 3, Question 3I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR. BUT, I watched the video and I reasone…
I don't know why this trips me up SO BADLY, but I ended up switching this one to the correct answer in my BR.
BUT, I watched the video and I reasoned it differently.
We're taught that, if we're given a premise, we have to take it to be true, ...Science Experiments in LR QuestionsPowerscore claims that recently PTs have had a lot more science experiment questions in LR. I've obviously taken a bunch of science classes and know …
... />
For example, on PT 71 Section 3 #4, E is the right ...PT 23 Section 3 Question 12Sooooo inferences are usually much more clear and this one is giving me a lot of trouble. I gave B a considerable amount of thought, but I felt like …
Sooooo inferences are usually much more clear and this one is giving me a lot of trouble. I gave B a considerable amount of thought, but I felt like it's a flaw because it goes from health food enthusiasts to saying in general, those who take XYZ will ...PT 73 Section 3 Game 2Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z? For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X c…
Hey all, can someone explain to me why BOTH X and Y don’t have to be before Z?
For example, for question number 8, JY said for answer choice C, X can go before Z as long as Y goes after Z. I am having trouble with my fundamentals, please help, ...Mapping Logical Reasoning: Do we have a set of questions available?Hi Everyone! I've been doing a lot of work recently with memorizing valid inferences that can be made from conditional and inter-sectional statem…
... set of questions similar to PT 43, Section 3, Question 9, beginning "Most ...Abstract language.I have an issue with the harder flaw reasoning questions. 99 times out of 100 i can point out the flaw. Hell i can make a stand up comedy routine abo…
... abstract language down. (random example. PT 41 section 3 question 20)
PT's. sort of just wanted ...[Ended] Free RC Tutoring - Economics Passage [6 P.M. EDT]Hey Everyone, This week again we will keep practicing the low-high resolution summary method. The point of practice is to get better at what we a…
... will be doing **PT 8, Section 3, Passage 2**. The PT is available for ...Conditional Reasoning; Relation to Premises and Conclusions?Hello Folks, I posted this in the powerscore forum as well, but it looks a little dead over there. I was hoping I might be able to pick someone's …
... , I believe this is from PT 31 Section 3 Number 22.
Confusion about : "The {person}'s argument proceeds by...."I am a little confused about questions in which a scientist/critic/psychologist/whatever will state their opinion on something, often giving context …
... this is Question 20 from PT 68 section 3. I missed this question ...Possible Substitution Equivalency StrategyHi. Im studying for the June LSAT and (like most people) am having trouble with SE questions. While watching on of JY's game explanation videos for P…
... 's game explanation videos for PT 66 and noticing some differences ... to this in this case (PT 66, section 3, Q11). However, upon my ...Distorting Argument - Flaw Answer ChoiceCan someone provide me with an example of what "distorts an argument against X, and then attacks this distorted argument" would look like? PT C2, …
Can someone provide me with an example of what "distorts an argument against X, and then attacks this distorted argument" would look like?
PT C2, Section #3, Question #6 Answer Choice DTrouble with Science RC passages?Check out JY’s explanation breaking down the passage for PT 42, Section 3, Passage 4. He shows how crucial it is to be able to visualize. It is a gre…
Check out JY’s explanation breaking down the passage for PT 42, Section 3, Passage 4. He shows how crucial it is to be able to visualize. It is a great passage to hit hard for review!Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... why A is incorrect. For PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser" my ...Conditional Answer Choices for STRENGTHEN/WEAKENHi thanks in advance if anyone can help. How should I deal with conditional answer choices in strengthen and weaken questions. Does it matter if the …
... . The first one is from PT 4 section 1 #13. I was ... ? The next one is from PT 5 Section 3 #8 where i had ...RC PassagesTypically, it takes me 5/6 minutes to read an entire passage without ignoring anything. How in the world can one read some of these lengthy and b…
... find the details after a 3-3:30 minute read. If you ... I read.
Passage 2, PT 14, Section 3.
Paragraph one ... connects to anything.
Paragraph 3: Here's the meat and ... from the deconstructivists POV, paragraph 3 gives one from the author ...
