HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| 39 | 383 | 450 |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
| 2 | 23.7K | 33.4K |
| 24 | 1.1K | 1.3K |
-
PT 66 Section 2 Question 13: Brooks: I'm unhappy in my....Okay, this question has got me. I'm BRing it, and I honestly cannot rule one answer out with confidence. That never happens. A, C, and D all seem pre…
Okay, this question has got me. I'm BRing it, and I honestly cannot rule one answer out with confidence. That never happens. A, C, and D all seem pretty subjective to me, "mischaracterizing what Brooks says", "unhappiness varying in intensity of ... -
PT48.S2.Q19 (G4) - three folk groupsPT 48 Section 2 (LG) Q.19 Questions asks: Which one of the following groups must perform earlier than 10? Does that mean it includes 10? …
PT 48 Section 2 (LG) Q.19
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-48-section-2-game-4/ -
PT77.S2.Q19 - a recent study examinedHi All, So I'm still struggling to identify exactly when certain arguments could be strengthened or weakened by the total number of samples (or a…
... trend) etc.
PT 77 Section 2 #19: A recent study examined ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-19/ -
Descriptive premises with normative conclusions in sufficient assumption questionsIs it always the case that if an argument for a sufficient assumption question has descriptive premises with a normative conclusion (saying one shoul…
... /> Looking at PT 22, Section 4, Q13 and PT 62, Section 2, Q17, I can ... -
What's the LSAT's definition of "linked"?In PT 77, Section 2, Questions 5 and 14 they both use the word "linked" in their arguments. When the LSAT uses the word "linked," does it only mean c…
In PT 77, Section 2, Questions 5 and 14 they both use the word "linked" in their arguments. When the LSAT uses the word "linked," does it only mean correlation? -
PT77.S2.Q18 - historian: those who claim that shakespearePT 77, Section 2, #18 Answer Choices C and D. Does "fails to exclude" mean the same thing more or less as "fails to consider"? I thought "fails to …
PT 77, Section 2, #18 Answer Choices C and ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-77-section-2-question-18/ -
Principle or PSA?Principle or PSA question? ------------ In LR, I try to identify the question type as quickly as possible, but sometimes I cannot identify immediat…
... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-57-section-2-question-01/
This ... /> https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-39-section-2-question-11/
Is ... -
Proposition QuestionsProposition questions: should I approach these like an inference question or a principle question? I've read different things. Example of this questi…
Proposition questions: should I approach these like an inference question or a principle question? I've read different things. Example of this question type is PT 82 section 2 question 14.
Thanks in advance! -
PT41.S2.Q13 (G3) - Each of the seven members of the boardHello, I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from LG 3. Q13 asks for a complete and accurate list of members that could be in the…
... , I had a question concerning PT 41, Section 2 Q13. This is from ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-41-section-2-game-3/ -
PT 59 Section 2 (LR1)Could somebody explain to me why the correct answers are correct for questions 7, 18, and 25? Why is 7 (e) instead of (b), why is 18 (d) instead of …
Could somebody explain to me why the correct answers are correct for questions 7, 18, and 25?
Why is 7 (e) instead of (b), why is 18 (d) instead of (c), and why is 25 (b) ?
Appreciate any help, thanks -
Please help! Negating conditional to some..nothttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-39-section-2-question-17/ In the question above, JY says negates b (If the Japanese drive on the left sid…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-39-section-2-question-17/
In ... -
PT 3 SECTION 2 QUESTION 5I chose D, but I think I might have mistaken this for a strengthen question. However, I don't understand how E is correct. Why does the fact that it …
I chose D, but I think I might have mistaken this for a strengthen question. However, I don't understand how E is correct. Why does the fact that it doesn't show that megatelescope research is worhty for comparison.... matter? I feel like this is one of ... -
Chunky Question StemIn hindsight I understand why D is correct (PT 3 section 2 Q 9), but I eliminated it because in the STIMULUS the comparison was to the **same amount…
... understand why D is correct (PT 3 section 2 Q 9), but I ... -
Advice on improving timed LR score?So I've now gotten to the point where I am able to get around 22 points correct in BR /untimed in LR. I am someone who really gets tripped up by the …
... timer (especially in this section) to the point where ... one daily timed LR section this week as I ... scores. I just took PT 62 section 2 (I believe it' ... free) tutoring in this section or knows someone who is ... have great potential in that section (usually score 21+ ... -
Consistency in LRI am having trouble with consistency in LR sections. Some days I will take a PT and go -3 to -5 on the LR sections, and other times (like today PT 84…
... days I will take a PT and go -3 to -5 ... , and other times (like today PT 84 section 2) I will get -12 ... -
Tutoring sessionsHello everyone after taking the August LSAT and a short break I want to give back. I want to offer free tutoring to everyone, one on one or groups de…
... be doing Blind review for PT 50 Section 2 (LR) on Saturday (9 ... )
Also Blind Review for PT 50 Section 1 (LG) on Sunday ... -
Where can I find LR video explanations?I'm working through some LR drills and going over my wrong answers, but can't seem to find video explanations for PT 3 Section 4, PT 15 Section 2, an…
... video explanations for PT 3 Section 4, PT 15 Section 2, and PT A Section 4. Any ... to find PT 3, but couldn't get videos for section 4 ... specifically. Same goes for the other PT videos ... -
PT56.S2.Q23 - Can anyone explain how this is an illegal reversal to me?<a href="https://www.manhattanprep.com/lsat/forums/q23-ecologist-without-the-intervention-of-t579.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.manhattanprep.com/…
... is described here. It is PT 56 Section 2 Question 23. I was ... ://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-56-section-2-question-23/ -
PT9.S2.Q20 - A university should not be encouraged to patent...Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20?
Can someone explain why the correct answer choice is A for PT 9, Section 2, Question 20? -
PT69.S2.Q15 - How to interpret "except" as a logical indicator in this context?Hi, Could someone please help me with interpreting "except" in this sentence? In order to encourage personal responsibility in adults, societ…
... short premise is originally from PT 69 Section 2 Q15. The way JY ... questions, please use the format: "PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of ... -
Point of Issue - Y/N list or honing in on difference?Hello there. Question on point of issue questions - which is better? doing the list method or reading through and determining the disagreement/agree…
Hey Quinn, a great example of the "MSS" is PT 61, Section 2 Q7.
Notice how Talbert didn't say anything about Chess should be taught. Talbert just lists good factors about chess which you have to imply that Talbert is for chess. -
Game with Star rulesDoes anyone remember which game Ping drew a star to indicate the shared rules between each entity? I would like to review all abnormal game types be…
... /> Some abnormal games: Dinner table (PT 41 game 4), Stained glass ... , Zones, PT 68 game 4 (it's ... , and the Capital employees game (PT 39 game 2).
Those are ... -
Pattern RecognitionI’ve heard so many times that the LSAT is a test of pattern recognition. Some people define pattern recognition as anticipating or pre-phrasing answe…
... about some boring subject and 2. you are likely to skip ... great example is PT 39, passage 2. The last 2 or 3 lines of ... -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
If any one is curious the question that I'm looking at with regards to the above is PT 49, Section 2 Question 17 -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
... "Some and Most Relationships." PT 30, Section 2, Q20 has an illustration of ... -
Negation Help !Some A's are not B's A's -----> not B 's (some) What if I want to negate some A's are not B's? would the negation be .... …
I actually found an excellent example for you!
PT 39 Sec. 2 Q#21 -
Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... recently gotten wrong include: Principle: PT 54 Section 2 Q18 (answered A, correct ... answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 Q15 (answered B, correct answer ...
