Clearly I'm having a hard time mapping out logic... Can someone please explain the correct answer? Also any tips on how to improve mapping out logic would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks!
Hi,
On this question I narrowed it down to C and D. But even though I've read a couple explanations on it, I don't see why D is glaringly wrong. I feel like C isn't fair enough because it has words like "chance" and "try to identify" which means ...
Okay, this question has got me. I'm BRing it, and I honestly cannot rule one answer out with confidence. That never happens. A, C, and D all seem pretty subjective to me, "mischaracterizing what Brooks says", "unhappiness varying in intensity of ...
In PT 77, Section2, Questions 5 and 14 they both use the word "linked" in their arguments. When the LSAT uses the word "linked," does it only mean correlation?
Proposition questions: should I approach these like an inference question or a principle question? I've read different things. Example of this question type is PT 82 section2 question 14.
Could somebody explain to me why the correct answers are correct for questions 7, 18, and 25?
Why is 7 (e) instead of (b), why is 18 (d) instead of (c), and why is 25 (b) ?
I chose D, but I think I might have mistaken this for a strengthen question. However, I don't understand how E is correct. Why does the fact that it doesn't show that megatelescope research is worhty for comparison.... matter? I feel like this is one of ...
... timer (especially in this section) to the point where ... one daily timed LR section this week as I ... scores. I just took PT 62 section2 (I believe it' ... free) tutoring in this section or knows someone who is ... have great potential in that section (usually score 21+ ...
... video explanations for PT 3 Section 4, PT 15 Section2, and PT A Section 4. Any ... to find PT 3, but couldn't get videos for section 4 ... specifically. Same goes for the other PT videos ...
... />
For example, PT 126 Section 3 Question 14 uses 'most ... across several PT's. For example, see PT 127, Section2, Question ... see PT 131 Section 3 Question 7. PT B Section 4 ... PT 19 Section2 Question 18.
Hey Quinn, a great example of the "MSS" is PT 61, Section2 Q7.
Notice how Talbert didn't say anything about Chess should be taught. Talbert just lists good factors about chess which you have to imply that Talbert is for chess.