In PT 13, Section 4, Question 7, when Murray says "You ... very relevant to answering the question, though not absolutely necessary. PT#.S#.Q# - brief description of question"**
I don't understand how E is the right answer over D. I eliminated the answer choice E because she claimed to be an insurance adjuster and didn't provide proof. How is claiming to be anything providing enough proof of being a government official? If the ...
I understand why the correct answer choice is correct because if robots were the only things going out to space, then why do we need to know anything about human limits but I don't understand why B is incorrect. Isn't the stimulus making the assumption ...
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation.
... wonderful advice. I have one question: how is strengthening/ weakening the ... take a look at PT 58 Section 4 question 23.
The ... a five star difficulty strengthening question. I am sure a big ... of the difficulty of this question is answer choice "A" ...
... them. You can revisit the question(s) after you learn more ... point us to a specific question or two that you particularly ... or telling us the PT number,section, and question number. Perhaps we will ...
... negates it, calling into question the power of the ... :
0) Identify the question stem. Take special note if ... the last section of this comment. 1) Identify premise ... weaken EXCEPT question is “The Embezzler” (preptest 32, section1, question 17).