... still have PT 76 and PT 77 available to PT in February ...
For everyone: take the PT under timed conditions; BR as ... 5pm - 8pm FEB Group BR PT52
Fri Nov 13, ... 5pm - 8pm FEB Group BR PT 56
Thu Nov 26 ... - 8pm FEB Group BR PT 61
Wed Dec ...
In answer B, he says she says "Hey, recycled paper isn't necessarily lower quality. In fact, the best paper was made was made from recycled materials..."
... was the case with PT26.S1.G3. However other times if ... was the case with PT19.S1.G.4. What do you ... to split them, however for PT.26.S1.G3, I had just ...
Hey! Can someone please help me with this one I'm really not sure why A is the right answer. It's funny when I took this test I got this question right (circled it because wasn't sure) but now not clear why it's right. Thanks so much!
I've seen many explanations regarding this infamous Han purple question--none of which have addressed my specific confusion:
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-74-section-1-question-17/
Hey, guys. Why is there talk of three M here when the rules say exactly two M? JY mentions three M and others also mentioned in the comments section. What am I missing here? Three M was never an option for me becatse of that rule.
... LG and fool proofed games 52-80. I decided to stick ... and did no tests before PT52. I am not sure whether ... fool proofed the games from PT52 to 81. I did all ... I finished fool proofing tests 52 - 81, I did some games ...
Is there a way to make the analytics accurate (total percentage ) if you only do certain sections from a test . For example for pt52 I did 2 sections but it scored the ones I didn’t do as incorrect .
... . I scored a 177 on PT 44 after only a week ... games and another 177 on PT52 after a month of going ... score on PTs 44 and 52 especially after months of studying ...
Why is "only very careful drivers use headlights when their use is not legally required" the answer here? I literally can't bend my mind to figure out why that changes anything after the headlight law went into effect and the resulting lack of collision ...
Is the reasoning flaw in the stimulus that it concludes what makes something not censorship from the sufficient condition for censorship?
If A or B, then Censorship exists.
From this, we cannot conclude that censorship does not exist.