I think this is the first question I've come across that I truly don't understand. I don't think I'm getting what the "obvious alternative" is. Not sending police officers? Dying here, plz help.
There is a myth out there that on Strengthen questions the LSAT will always give us four definitive non-strengtheners and only one strengthener. But this problem is arguably definitive proof that the myth is false.
**Admin edit: Please review our forum rules. Posting licensed LSAC materials is against the rule.**
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-30-section-4-question-20/
I thought B was correct because the conclusion is that general ...
Having serious problems with figuring out this question. E is the right answer, but I chose B. My thinking for B is that it may have been a coincidence that all three times Monroe had eaten at Tip-Top, was already ill beforehand but ...
... for Saturday's test is PT77. Initially I thought this was ... 't taken a recent enough PT (I did sit for September ... taking sections from a newer PT today (scattering them throughout the ...
... March 10, 7-9pm EST, PT 67
Sunday, March 17 ... , 7-9pm EST, PT 69
Sunday, March 24 ... , 7-9pm EST, PT 71
Sunday, March ... 31, 7-9pm EST, PT 73
Sunday, April ... April 14, 7-9pm EST, PT77
Sunday April 21, 7 ...
I've signed up for the November LSAT but haven't done any PTs in the 80s recently (I did 83 and 84 a long time ago). So for I'm only up to PT77. Are there any noticeable differences between these two sets?
Based on what I have read from answer explanations so far, this logical reasoning question seems to break the "cardinal rule" of there only being one truly right answer because both A and B here seem to strengthen the stimulus-- A just ...
Is the reasoning flaw in the stimulus that it concludes what makes something not censorship from the sufficient condition for censorship?
If A or B, then Censorship exists.
From this, we cannot conclude that censorship does not exist.
I'm a bit confused about the answer choice D. #help
**Premise 1**: Each of the EMP winners from the past 25 years covered by Acme retirement plan
**Intermediate Conclusion/Premise 2**: the Acme Plan offers the ...
I'm confused as to how this method can be used to compare chess-playing programs - to get the question right it seemed like you needed to know that you are only comparing one chess playing program to ...
Did anyone else get rid of A and C and choose B because it seemed as though A and C were essentially the same answer and therefore neither one of them could have been correct?
Answer choice C: "it is compatible either with accepting the conclusion or denying it"
I have seen this answer choice in other AP questions and want to make sure I understand what it means. From my understanding, this answer choice is an ...
So... the correct answer choice is E and I'm really trying to understand why that is the case. Is it because E is basically destroying the evidence which in turn would not be able to support the conclusion? If dogs, while learning how to perform tricks, ...
Are there two flaws in this stimulus? Armand is a mathematician so interior ministry isn’t his area of expertise and even if he doesn’t think the program is successful it doesn’t necessarily mean the figures are inaccurate?
The thing I don’t get is ...