@nantesorkestar said:
I just can't see any assumptions the argument is making. In my opinion, C might weaken the argument if the insertion occurs at a random spot. Doesn't this contradict that the fragments are in the same location?
... it and moved on to Game4 and knew even less how ... treat it like the virus game, but it took up so ... , and guessed on all of Game 3... I am so freaking ...
... else feel like the trading game was on par with PT72 ... 's game? I think it was that ... hard. Virus game was much easier IMO. game 4 and thinking, "Lol, nope ...
... , I don't think any game in LSAT history is a ... different about them. For instance PT C Game 2. Here we have ... a regular linear game but the spots are not ...
@DEC_LSAT Yeah, Game4 was pretty bad.(At least for me it was) I got to it with 10 minutes left on the clock but i struggled setting it up so I just gave it my best effort.
... games but i got to game4 with 10 minutes left on ... 't really figure out the game board so i ended up ... guesses for the entire last game. This also kind of shook ...
... the 70s (including I guess PT80) along with a few late ... a fresh, never-before-seen PT a week or less before ... highly advise you to take PT 79 (assuming you're operating ...
Yeah, this is a violation of the LSAC's rules. If you can find legal copies of PTs from the late 70s, they truly aren't that different at all from PT80.
@westcoastbestcoast @BryantFu PT80 (December 2016) has been released already. We'll have the videos up and ready for you guys before the February LSAT. :)
Haha thank you for the heads up @"J.Y. Ping" . I was searching amazon to purchase PT80 and I couldnt find it yet. Do you know where I could purchase the exam?
Hey! So I haven't come across anything exactly like it but try preptest 10 game 3, it's another unconventional game that kinda does like a trade off type thing. Preptest 11 game4 is another one thats similar. I'll keep an eye out for more!
This is an excellent list that I will be bookmarking. Thank you. PT 29 Section 4 Question 24 is illustrative. A very complex weakening question containing causation.