HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt | 22K | 36.6K |
| vs | 2.4K | 2.8K |
| section | 23.3K | 38.3K |
-
LR practice today! Join my discord if you want....?(Disclaimer-I am not actually Chappell Roan) Anyone down to go over PT 152 Section 1 #14-25 ish today? Or if you wanna join my discord group here'…
(Disclaimer-I am not actually Chappell Roan)
Anyone down to go over PT 152 Section 1 #14-25 ish today? Or if you wanna join my discord group here's the link: https://discord.gg/jrVHpuGb
Let's get this bread -
Point of Issue - Y/N list or honing in on difference?Hello there. Question on point of issue questions - which is better? doing the list method or reading through and determining the disagreement/agree…
Hey Quinn, a great example of the "MSS" is PT 61, Section 2 Q7.
Notice how Talbert didn't say anything about Chess should be taught. Talbert just lists good factors about chess which you have to imply that Talbert is for chess. -
Blind ReviewHello ladies and gentlemen, What is the correct training process for utilizing a BR? After, I have completed all 4 sections of my PT or after I ha…
... from a recent PT + 1 section from an old PT). I BR that ... -
I have lost my mind!!!I got 12 wrong in lr section today!! 12!!! And I usually score over 175!! I just started feeling really insecure and anxious while doing it. I couldn…
Which PT and section? I'm scoring around 170 ... random -8 thrown in. S2 PT 59. Some LR sections are ... -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
If any one is curious the question that I'm looking at with regards to the above is PT 49, Section 2 Question 17 -
Negating a Conditional StatementHey guys, I can't remember where this was in the course, but what is the proper way to negate a conditional statment? So for example: ~ (X-->Y)…
... "Some and Most Relationships." PT 30, Section 2, Q20 has an illustration ... -
Well not sureSo today I did worse on my timed pt vs last weeks but my br went up 20 points ? Still hitting low 150's on pt but mid 160's on br? What exactly doe…
... did worse on my timed pt vs last weeks but my br ... hitting low 150's on pt but mid 160's on ... -
Problem Set Changes Going Live Tonight (Wednesday night / Thursday morning)Good news, we finished the problem set changes! The <strong>problem set overhaul is going live tonight (Wednesday night / Thursday morning) at: 12…
... game designation; it specifies which PT and section, but not which specific ... -
Problem Set Changes Going Live Tonight (Wednesday night / Thursday morning)Good news, we finished the problem set changes! The <strong>problem set overhaul is going live tonight (Wednesday night / Thursday morning) at: 12…
... game designation; it specifies which PT and section, but not which specific ... -
PT vs DrillingI need advice. I started doing my PTs 4 weeks ago (have done10 PTs so far) - aiming for October. So my concern is that my scores are fluctuating gr…
@guitarnara said:
Or should I simply do as much PTs as possible + BR?
It depends on how thorough of a BR you're willing/able to do, especially given the issues you're having with LR. Make sure when you're BR'ing that you ... -
Diagramming Conditionals without indicator wordsSo I'm two months into studying for the Oct. LSAT and am working on improving my accuracy regarding necessary assumption questions. I encountered 2 p…
... why A is incorrect. For PT 56 Section 3 # 18 "Fund-raiser ... -
PT20.S1.Q02 - a director of the rexx pharmaceutical companyhttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-20-section-1-question-02/ Ok, I am pretty pissed I missed this because I felt like I got it right when I did…
I think you might be overcomplicating this problem and bringing too much of your own knowledge to bear on the argument.
@"Accounts Playable" said:
The pharm company only cares about selling the vaccines to hospitals and doctors, ... -
Explanation?Hi JY! I don't quite understand this answer choice as I eliminated option A and B as they mention water levels - which aren't specifically addressed …
I believe the OP is referring to PT 20 Section #1 Question 1 -
PT35.S2.P4 - ronald dworkin argues that judges arehttp://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-35-section-2-passage-4-passage/ I am a long-time lurker that is gearing up for the October exam. I really…
Following up on RC: PT 35, Section 2
My specific questions ... -
Necessary and sufficientI understand that this is probably a dumb question but I keep having difficulties with flaw questions that have answers that "confuse necessary and s…
... when I was working on PT 73 section 4, question 25:
Conditional Answer Choices for STRENGTHEN/WEAKENHi thanks in advance if anyone can help. How should I deal with conditional answer choices in strengthen and weaken questions. Does it matter if the …
... . The first one is from PT 4 section 1 #13. I was ... ? The next one is from PT 5 Section 3 #8 where i ...Search function?Is there a specific search box for the discussion board (not control + F)? Am I just blind?
Weaken, Principle and FlawI've gotten to a point where the only types of questions I'm missing are weaken, principle or flaw questions. I usually am on the right path to the c…
... gotten wrong include: Principle: PT 54 Section 2 Q18 (answered A, correct ... answer was C), PT 54 Section 4 Q9 (answered B, correct ... answer was A); Flaw: PT 54 Section 2 Q15 (answered B, correct ...Logic Games CrisisMy RC scores and LR scores are rather consistent. They are not perfect but I usually go -2 (easier ones) to -5(more difficult ones) on LR and -3 to…
Well, halfway through the third game I ran out of time so I guessed 4 questions.
In my last game, by the time I was done with the setup, I had 2 minutes to answer 6 questions.
Being an older PT, the section had 24 LG questionsCambridge bites the dustJust went over to Cambridge LSAT to check on the exact composition of their bundles and looks like all the official LSAT pdf's, including the bundles…
@allison.gill.sanford
PT 41. Section 4. Passage 1. I think the LSAC was just trolling us all.RC PassagesTypically, it takes me 5/6 minutes to read an entire passage without ignoring anything. How in the world can one read some of these lengthy and b…
... I read.
Passage 2, PT 14, Section 3.
Paragraph ...PT9.S1.Q19 - editorial: it is clear that if this country's universitiesCan you guys explain PT 9 section 1 question 19? it reads Editorial: It is clear that if this country's universities were living up to ~~~ I do…
@"mc_meatt" said:
PT 9 section 1 question 19
... 2 LR sections in that PT- Q#19 does not fit ... any way to verify the PT, S, Q #'s - we are ...diagramming this out...I'm really stuck. I understand that the correct answer is A, but I can't diagram the logic out. I'm fairly certain it involves subsets, which has alw…
@jspence316 can you post the PT number, section and question number, or the link to the curriculum problem you are talking about?Warming up before the testI always warm up before taking a PT and I know that it def helps, but I was wondering if any 7sagers advocate specific warm ups over other (e.g. doin…
... day is doing a PT vs not doing a PT 5 days a ...PT74.S1.Q16 - debater: as a pedagogical practiceHi folks, I'm struggling with this question in BR. So I figured I'd post my reasoning and see what you all think of it. Debater: Premise 1:Be…
... as the LSAT (See PT 19 Section 2 Question 1 for a ..."A few" versus "Few"Hi all, So I know "a few" is logically equivalent to "some" (more than 1), but for "few," can we say that it is logically equivalent to the opposi…
... highly problematic. Check out PT 1 Section 4 Question 21 Answers D ...Modern PTs got me downMy PT average has dropped from roughly the high 160s/low 170s on the older PTs to reliably the lower 160s on the PTs in the 70's. I'm planning on tak…
... say that the logic games section is lowering your average or ... is it another section? i'm curious what section or sections change ... PTs. There is one PT game section that was an exception for ...
