... . Unproven v. Untrue
PT64 S3 #14: “Arnot’s argument is ... challenge”
Ex: PT12 S1 #18: Erik attacking Frieda’s recommendation ... sample containing 1,000 peanuts” Q, AC C
v. Errors ...
... watching the lessons and practice Q's all over again. Plus ... drilling an addtl 20 Q's for each weakness. What ... ? So far I am getting 18/20 19/20 on my ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-51-section-3-question-18/
Ok. The explanation JY wrote is awesome, but I still don't understand why B is correct.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-59-section-3-question-24/
Answer is E. What does this even mean? :O
E) "presumes,without providing justification, that 18 century European aesthetics is as encompassing as an aesthetic theory can be"
I'm confused to when to diagram. some inference Q are obvious with logical indicators. Some are hidden or have causation in the argument and qualifiers (maybe, could etc). When do you diagram? what's the general rule?
As you know, I'm a big LSAT nerd. I love LSAT and I love LSATters. 7sage is a huge part of my life. Some of my most important contacts and favorite buddies have come through this forum. So, I'm looking for a way to give back ... ...