HitBox
| Word | Docs | Hits |
|---|---|---|
| pt55 | 69 | 112 |
| s1 | 1.1K | 1.4K |
| q21 | 211 | 228 |
-
Hardest RC Section (PT02.S1)Hey All, I just took Preptest 2, Section 1 twice (once timed, once untimed) and BOTH TIMES got my butt kicked...even going through the correct ans…
Hey All,
I just took Preptest 2, Section 1 twice (once timed, once untimed) and BOTH TIMES got my butt kicked...even going through the correct answers now, I'm like "What?? How on earth is that correct?" Has anyone else taken this section ... -
PT45.S1.Q24 - in criminal proceedingsStill trying to tease out the stimulus on this one. I don't understand what the two different DNA tests are or how they are confused or what the assu…
Still trying to tease out the stimulus on this one. I don't understand what the two different DNA tests are or how they are confused or what the assumption is.
Premise: DNA tests can't distinguish among samples from different people. ... -
PT20.S1.Q14 - yolanda: gaining access to computers Why is the correct answer C? I did watch JY's video, but still not sure why B is wrong. Here's my reasoning: Yolanda’s conclusion: Joyriding is…
Why is the correct answer C? I did watch JY's video, but still not sure why B is wrong. Here's my reasoning:
Yolanda’s conclusion: Joyriding is the MORE dangerous crime (than gaining access to computers without authorization)
Arjun’s ... -
PT9.S1.Q24 & Q27 - the english who in the seventeenthHi guys, could someone explain to me why answer choice C is correct for Q24? It doesn't explicitly say in the passage that the English "allowed" Parl…
Hi guys, could someone explain to me why answer choice C is correct for Q24? It doesn't explicitly say in the passage that the English "allowed" Parliament to make constitutional changes by legislative enactment. I guess this is correct because we can ... -
PT29.S1.Q08 - nutritionist: many people claim thatHi! I am struggling to see why D is right over E. When I first solved this Q, I selected D, but after I did BR, I chose E. D) I initially liked a…
Hi! I am struggling to see why D is right over E. When I first solved this Q, I selected D, but after I did BR, I chose E.
D) I initially liked answer D. However, when I reread the stimulus, I focused on the part that says for **MANY** ... -
PT16.S1.Q01 - eight new studentsHi I was just watching JY's video on grouping games set up 1. https://7sage.com/lesson/grouping-game-1-game-board-setup/ I'm wondering why "ne…
Hi I was just watching JY's video on grouping games set up 1.
https://7sage.com/lesson/grouping-game-1-game-board-setup/
I'm wondering why "neither nor" in rule 3 is interpreted as not both, as in S -> /Y , and W->/Y. < ... -
PT63.S3.Q21 - Weed-killer datahttps://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-21/ I'm trying to understand this passage fully... I thought the data on the eff…
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-63-section-3-question-21/
I'm trying to understand this passage fully...
I thought the data on the effects of the weed-killer would be misleading when it was drawn from studies of the ... -
Embedded conditional OR referential phrase?Hi all, Having trouble understanding when there is an embedded conditional (or, the LSAT wants us to view it as such) or a referential phrase that…
... 's a specific example: PT70.S1.Q23
"Columnist: Although ... -
PT55.S3.Q24 - it is popularly believed thatCan someone please confirm that I have this chain correct? I became confused with the "cannot" in the first premise. Now I'm presuming "cannot" is mo…
Can someone please confirm that I have this chain correct? I became confused with the "cannot" in the first premise. Now I'm presuming "cannot" is modifying the sufficient clause since this premise includes "unless." Please correct me if I'm wrong. I was ... -
PT53.S1.Q18 - when a salesperson is successfulHello- Hoping for some insight on question 18. When I first began my LSAT studying journey, I found flaw questions to be very straight forward. Th…
Hello- Hoping for some insight on question 18.
When I first began my LSAT studying journey, I found flaw questions to be very straight forward. They have unfortunately turned into a question where I often find myself second guessing on my AC ... -
PT1.S4.Q21 - a society in which there are many crimesI am Completely stumped on this question. I am not sure if I am correctly negating the statement nor understanding the some relationship here Stim…
I am Completely stumped on this question. I am not sure if I am correctly negating the statement nor understanding the some relationship here
Stimulus Statement: "No laws has No Crimes", Because no laws can be broken.
Makes ... -
Notes from LR Crash Course Workshop #3Hi everyone, I recently participated in J.Y.'s LR Crash Course Workshop #3 and wanted to share some of the key takeaways from the discussions we ha…
... :
* PT54/2/14
* PT55/1/7 answer E broadens ... for why it happened
* PT55/3/21 - The second sentence ... -
PT48.S4.Q21 - Sociologist: Traditional norms in our societySufficient Assumption question https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-48-section-4-question-21/ Under the timed condition, I got this question …
Sufficient Assumption question
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-48-section-4-question-21/
Under the timed condition, I got this question right by diagramming as follows:
> Context: Ignore unpleasant ... -
PT42.S1.G4 (Q19) - for the school paperCan someone explain to me this stimulus? It says "Which one of the following could be an accurate and complete list of the students who review only _…
Can someone explain to me this stimulus? It says "Which one of the following could be an accurate and complete list of the students who review only _Sunset_?" Usually, the "complete and accurate" stimuli want a list of all the items across all possible ... -
PT5.S1.Q18 - Mary, a veterinary student, has been assignedI still don't understand this question, I chose A but the right answer is B. Why is it B, since it does not mention anything about persons?
I still don't understand this question, I chose A but the right answer is B. Why is it B, since it does not mention anything about persons? -
PT70.S1.Q6 - the thimble corporation recently distributedIt's always the one star question that throws me for a loop... This was a question I circled for BR and even after thoroughly reviewing it, I chos…
It's always the one star question that throws me for a loop...
This was a question I circled for BR and even after thoroughly reviewing it, I chose incorrectly (D).
The question gives us and a problem and principle.
PT8.S1.Q20 - principle that justifies both sides of argumentCan someone explain why B is correct for this question? I find this question confusing, mostly because the way the prompt asks for a principle that i…
Can someone explain why B is correct for this question? I find this question confusing, mostly because the way the prompt asks for a principle that if established will prove both sides of the argument correct.
To me B justifies the rehab ...PTA.S1.Q25 - in one-round sealed-bid auctionsCould someone help me shed some light on why the correct answer is correct? The passage refers to "such protection", as protection for the sellers (t…
Could someone help me shed some light on why the correct answer is correct? The passage refers to "such protection", as protection for the sellers (to not have to sell to a buyer who bids extremely low), but the correct answer (E), doesn't seem to be ...Need Help with MSS v. Strengthen, v. Correlation/Causation StrengthenI am stuck on some of the MSS questions, Weaken, and the difference with how to tell MSS and Strengthen apart especially when C/C Strengthen is in pl…
... /> For example, PT 16, S2, Q21 was on a webinar with ...PT31.S1.GM2 for problem set 3 does not match the explanation link in Question BankSomething completely different than what I have printed.
Something completely different than what I have printed.PT54.S2.Q21 - most people who become migraine sufferers hi, can someone explain why answer choice e isnt a match? I'm still not 100% sure after BRing and watching the explination vid. https://7sage.com/l…
hi, can someone explain why answer choice e isnt a match? I'm still not 100% sure after BRing and watching the explination vid.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-54-section-2-question-21/PT35.S1.Q15 - statistician: a financial magazine claimed that its survey of itsI chose C because it is weakening the argument which is saying that people are more concerned about their finances than politics and C says that they…
I chose C because it is weakening the argument which is saying that people are more concerned about their finances than politics and C says that they are JUST AS concerned about their finances and politics thus weakening the argument and I thought E was ...PT38.S1.Q06 - Every year, new reports appear concerning the healthIm having trouble understanding why answer choice E is correct. I chose answer choice D because the conclusion has to do with the experts being usele…
Im having trouble understanding why answer choice E is correct. I chose answer choice D because the conclusion has to do with the experts being useless because they offered contradictory information. I thought that when were looking at reasoning method ...PT4.S1.Q10I'm adding my explanation to this question since it doesn't currently exist on 7sage. Feel free to critique my reasoning. This is a necessary ass…
I'm adding my explanation to this question since it doesn't currently exist on 7sage. Feel free to critique my reasoning.
This is a necessary assumption question. We know this because the question stem says the argument above makes which ...PT17.S2.Q21 - nuclear reactors are sometimes builtHi All, I could use some help with this necessary assumption question. I definitely see why C is a necessary assumption, but I'm having a hard tim…
Hi All,
I could use some help with this necessary assumption question. I definitely see why C is a necessary assumption, but I'm having a hard time figuring out why E is not also an equally necessary assumption. I have yet to find an ...PT28.S1.Q20 - Economy, Unemployment, InvestmentHi could someone help me out with the diagramming on this one? I found it absolutely confounding and I'm usually pretty decent at conditional phrasin…
Hi could someone help me out with the diagramming on this one? I found it absolutely confounding and I'm usually pretty decent at conditional phrasing.
So what I took away from this after looking at this thoroughly was that the original ...PT74.S1.Q24 - any driver involved in an accidentFor this question (it's helpful to watch the video), JY does the logic and it comes out to this: Capable and (PI or 500) --> Report ~Report _…
For this question (it's helpful to watch the video), JY does the logic and it comes out to this:
Capable and (PI or 500) --> Report
~Report
_________
not (capable) or not (PI or 500)
...
