... typical timed PTs and blind review without much progress. Surprisingly, my ... a 177. Also, recommend a book called a way of life ... Hopkins Medical School and this book is from a lecture he ...
... with a totally different study book/materials, and then added in ... />
6 Weeks to LSAT: Review weak material; a minimum of ... />
4 Weeks to LSAT: Review; Assess timing issues and focus ... yourself. And NEVER skip blind review; force yourself to engage with ...
... the spacing and margins. I review essays now and those tricks ... be engaging, like a good book you can't put down ... program and the university, law review editor, and have racked up ...
... Looking forward to the Blind Review sessions on Monday. The ... of-the-week-lr-blind-review-pt72-s2/)) and ([RC](https:// ... associated Blind Review sessions on Monday! ([LR Review](https://7sage. ... the-week-lr-blind-review-pt72-s2/) | [RC Review](https://7sage.com/ ...
This question is very difficult because I just cannnot understand the stimulus. Could I please get an explanation of this question stem and answer choices?
I do not understand the difference between answer choice C and D. How do you suggest that I decipher between two choices that are so close. I tried to incorporate them into the passage and incorrectly thought that D was a winner.
Could someone please help me to find where in the course I can find how to deal with "logically complete question stem". I am working on PT 59 S2 Q24 and I think I misinterpreted what was required. Are these questions MBT or MC?
Not quite sure if this is the appropriate category to ask this question, but here goes...
I just finished the "Intro to Arguments" lesson and wanted more practice, so I returned to the June 2007 Practice Test. As I went through Section 2, I ...
Wow, I did everything on this question and got sucked into answer choice E but had no idea to interpret the word "that" the way JY explained it. Are there others words that indicate "and" or sufficiency that are worth knowing?
http://7sage.com/ ...
If anyone wants to review PT 68 with me tomorrow (Friday) over google hangout/skype. private message me and we can get started. Logical reasoning, both sections.
* Premise:
- TV news watchers have NO expectations of careful discussion of public issues.
- newspaper readers have the expectation of careful discussion of public issues.
* Conclusion: In contrast to regular newspaper ...
... got it right during blind review! still I did run out ... LR (S***!!!! Even after blind review I had 8 wrong :/), and ... ... thankfully got it during blind review).
Hello, I am planning to review the course, so I was wondering if there is a way to get rid of the green check in front of each lesson, which really gets in my way of doing this. Thanks!
This game was terribly difficult for me, but after spending quite a bit of time thinking about it, I think I've figured out what surely has to be the best way to set this game up. The game seems confusing because it pretends to have 5 game pieces (the five ...